REKONSTRUKSI POLITIK HUKUM ACARA PIDANA: URGENSI PENGADOPSIAN PENUNTUTAN BERSAMA (CO-PROSECUTION) UNTUK PERADILAN PIDANA YANG INKLUSIF

Authors

  • Aulia Anas Tasya Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang
  • Briliyan Ernawati Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang
  • Muhammad Dzihan Nawalun Nuha Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang
  • Prasasti Bening Nurani Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang
  • Muhammad Robith Qolbaini Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang
  • Muhammad Yusuf Halimi Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang
  • Alif Nuraini Ulistiana Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i02.60926

Keywords:

Co-Prosecution; Dominus Litis; Private Prosecution; Restorative Justice; RKUHAP

Abstract

The Indonesian criminal justice system, regulated under the 1981 Criminal 

Procedure Code (KUHAP), is currently dominated by a rigid retributive approach 

that positions the state as the sole holder of prosecutorial power through the 

dominus litis principle. Consequently, the victim's position is highly marginalized and 

passive, limited to acting merely as a witness during trial. This normative legal 

research aims to formulate a reconstruction of Indonesian criminal procedural law 

by exploring the potential adoption of active prosecution rights for victims through a 

critical comparative analysis with the Thai legal system. The study employs 

statutory, conceptual, and comparative legal approaches. The findings reveal that 

although Thailand recognizes private prosecution, granting victims independent 

standing to bring cases directly to court, this mechanism is highly vulnerable to being 

weaponized as Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPPs) by 

powerful corporate entities to silence journalists and vulnerable groups. Therefore, 

this study recommends that Indonesia should refrain from adopting pure private 

prosecution, and instead reconstruct its procedural system toward a Co-Prosecution 

model. Under this model, victims are granted active procedural rights to formally 

accompany public prosecutors in court for specific offenses, filtered through the 

optimization of the Preliminary Hearing Judge (HPP) to prevent bad-faith lawsuits

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akbar, M. F. (2022). Pembaharuan Keadilan Restoratif dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 51(2), 199-208. https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/mmh/article/view/40526

Aliansi Nasional Reformasi KUHAP. (2025). Naskah Akademik Rancangan Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (RUU KUHAP) Berbasis Hak Asasi Manusia. Jentera.(https://asperhupiki.id/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/NA_KUHAP_RUU_KUHAP_merged.pdf)

Al-Qur'an, QS. Al-Baqarah [2]: 178-179; QS. Al-Ma'idah [5]: Surat Al-Baqarah Ayat 178: Arab, Latin, Terjemah dan Tafsir Lengkap | Quran NU Online.

Azzahra, F. (2025). Protection of witnesses and victims in the Indonesian and Thai legal systems: An access to justice framework. International Journal of Civil Society Studies, 7(1), 45-59. https://pcijournal.org/index.php/ijcss/article/download/1319/773

Fitri Wahyuni, Hukum Pidana Islam: Aktualisasi Nilai-Nilai Hukum Pidana Islam dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia (Tembilahan: PT Nusantara Persada Utama, 2018), Buku Hukum.Pidana Islam_Dr. Fitri Unisi.pdf.

Hariza, M. G., & Nurhidayat, S. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana dalam Konsep Pemaafan Hakim (Perbandingan antara Hukum Pidana Indonesia dengan Belanda). Jurnal PSHA, 1-18. https://journal.uii.ac.id/psha/article/download/46003/19310

Hendra, Hermawan, and Setyawan Theja. “Analisis Asas Domitus Litis Dan Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Perspektif Perjak No 15 Tahun 2020” 25, no. 15 (2022).

Kusuma, M., & Diani, R. (2022). Qishash Diyat Dalam Hukum Pidana Islam Lebih Mencerminkan Keadilan Dari Sisi Korban. Jurnal Dinamika, 2(2), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.54895/dinamika.v2i2.1829

Lugianto, A. (2014). Rekonstruksi Perlindungan Hak-Hak Korban Tindak Pidana. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 43(4), 512-521. https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/mmh/article/view/11087

Mahendra Kusuma dan Rosida Diani, 'Qishash Diyat dalam Hukum Pidana Islam Lebih Mencerminkan Keadilan dari Sisi Korban,' Jurnal Dinamika 2, no. 2 (2022): Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital.

Pebrianto, R., & Dharma, M. P. P. (2024). Pemaafan Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Dalam Hukum Islam dan Relevansinya Dengan UU No. 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Journal of Contemporary Laws Studies, 2(3), 230-245. https://journal.pubmedia.id/index.php/lawstudies/article/download/2614/3091/5977

Rachman, T. (2023). Can the Indonesian criminal justice system be enhanced by replacing the mandatory prosecution system with a discretionary one, like that used in Australia? (Doctoral dissertation, Victoria University). Victoria University Research Repository.(https://vuir.vu.edu.au/31832/1/RACHMAN%20Taufik%20-%20Thesis.pdf)

Rizky Fauzi, Watni Marpaung, dan Nurul Huda Prasetya, 'Restorative Justice Concept in Islam & Its Implementation in National Criminal Law from Islamic Legal Philosophy,' Jurnal Akta 12, no. 1 (2025); S. T. Halimang, Ridhwan Ridhwan, dan Sakdiah Sakdiah, 'Justice and Qisas in Islamic Law,' Samarah 9, no. 1 (2025):

Santriana, S., Anisah, D., & Kesuma, S. I. (2023). Crime victims in Indonesia's criminal justice system based on The Criminal Procedure Law (KUHAP). Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik, 1(3), 90-98. https://doi.org/10.59581/jhsp-widyakarya.v1i3

Setiadi, A. (2023). Crime victims in Indonesia's criminal justice system: A critical overview. Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik, 1(3), 90-98. https://doi.org/10.59581/jhsp-widyakarya.v1i3

Sihombing, D. C., dkk. (2023). Penguatan Kewenangan Jaksa Selaku Dominus Litis Sebagai Upaya Optimalisasi Penegakan Hukum Pidana Berorientasi Keadilan Restoratif. LOCUS: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum, 3(2), 112-125. https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v10i3.70191

Sistem, Transformasi, and Advocaat Generaal. “Rekomendasi Kebijakan Transformasi Sistem Penuntutan,” n.d.

Terpadu, Penegakan Hukum, and Tindak Pidana Pemilu. “PENERAPAN ASAS DOMINUS LITIS KEJAKSAAN DALAM SENTRA PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERPADU (GAKKUMDU) PADA PENANGANAN TINDAK PIDANA PEMILU 1 Oleh : Enricho Rey Mangamba 2 Dientje Rumimpunu3 Mario A. Gerungan” 15, no. 3 (2025).

Tongtek Sahur Berujung Maut di Kayen Pati, Polisi Tangkap 4 Tersangka Kompas.com, 16 Maret 2026, 15:34 WIB Muhamad Kafi, Andi Hartik (2026).

Ulil Albab Al Aulia Alpaten dan Rustam Dahar Karnadi Apollo Harahap, 'Integrasi Teori Diyat Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam dengan Pendekatan Restorative Justice dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana Indonesia,' Khatulistiwa Law Review 6, no. 2 (2025) View of Integrasi Teori Diyat Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam dengan Pendekatan Restorative Justice dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana Indonesia.

Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban; Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2025 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana UU No. 31 Tahun 2014.

Wijayanto, I., & Wulandari, C. (2023). Victim Participation in the Criminal Justice Process: A Comparative Study Between Indonesia and Russia. Jurnal Hukum DPR, 14(2), 120-135. https://vs-jurnal.dpr.go.id/index.php/hukum/article/viewFile/4136/pdf

Downloads

Published

2026-07-15