Analisis Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Dalam Pembelajaran Di Sekolah Dasar Menggunakan CIPP : Sebuah Systematic Literature Review

Authors

  • Novita Asriningrum Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
  • Eva Maulina Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
  • Ahmad Muhibbin Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
  • Agus Susilo Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i02.60767

Keywords:

Educational program evaluation; CIPP model; elementary school; learning; narrative literature review

Abstract

The Narrative Literature Review (NLR) approach was employed in this study

to examine various scientific articles concerning the evaluation of educational

programs in elementary schools based on the Context, Input, Process, Product

(CIPP) model. The data analysis involved stages of identification, selection,

categorization, and synthesis of diverse research findings according to the

four core components of the model. The literature review demonstrated that

the success of a program largely depends on its relevance to the needs of

students and schools. Other determining factors include teachers’

competencies, the availability of facilities, managerial support, as well as the

effectiveness of program implementation and supervision. From the product

component perspective, most programs were found to generate positive

impacts on improving student learning outcomes, teaching quality, teacher

competence, and institutional quality. However, implementation in practice

continues to face challenges, including budget constraints, limited resources,

and insufficient training opportunities. Overall, the CIPP model serves as a

comprehensive and effective evaluation instrument for assessing the

achievement of educational programs. This approach also provides a strong

foundation for decision-making and the sustainable development of learning

practices in elementary schools.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Amin, M. Y., Syahrul, S., & Su-hardi, I. (2025). Evaluasi Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka di Sekolah Dasar Kecamatan Bulupoddo Ka-bupaten Sinjai. Jurnal Pen-didikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 10(6), 256–264.

Efendi, M. M. (2026). Peningkatan Kualitas Guru MI Islamiyah Ciwaru melalui Program Pembimbingan Berbasis Pembelajaran Diferensiasi.

Haryati, R., Fadliyah, C., Rah-mona, F., Nabillah, S., & Susanti, D. (2025). A Sus-tainable CIPP Evaluation-Based School Literacy Pro-gram: Program Literasi Sekolah Berbasis Evaluasi CIPP yang Berkelanjutan. Indonesian Journal of Inno-vation Studies, 26(3), 10–21070.

Joko, M. S. (2025). Evaluasi Pro-gram Sekolah Penggerak dalam Peningkatan Mutu Pendidikan di Indonesia. Jurnal El Makrifah, 2(1), 110–122.

Kasmaini, K., Hamzah, S., & Winarto, H. (2023). CIPP Evaluation Model: Online In-service Teachers Training Program Conducted at Eng-lish Language Education Study Program of Bengkulu University. English Franca, 7(1).

Khamidah, S., & Sanoto, H. (2025). Evaluating Inclusive Education Implementation Using the CIPP Model: A Case Study of SDN Gen-dongan 01 Salatiga, Indone-sia. Journal of Innovation and Research in Primary Education, 4(4), 1904–1915.

Prayogo, D. (2022). CIPP evalua-tion model and its effect on e-learning. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(1), 177–188.

Putri, S. H. (2024). Analisis Im-plementasi Kurikulum Merdeka Di SMA Negeri 1 Palipi. Cognoscere: Jurnal Komunikasi dan Media Pen-didikan, 2(2), 102–107.

Ridho, A., Munthe, A. D., Shapu-tra, D. A., Wahyuni, I., Lubis, L. F. P., Maysarah, N., & Nasution, I. (2023). Analisis evaluasi program pendidikan dalam pembelajaran di sekolah. Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa Dan Budaya, 2(2), 211–221.

Roseju, A. W., & Walid, M. (2025). Strategi kepala sekolah da-lam membangun lingkungan sekolah inklusif. JIIP-Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 8(12), 13234–13241.

Rother, E. T. (2007). Systematic literature review X narrative review. Acta paulista de enfermagem, 20, v–vi.

Stufflebeam, D. L. (2000). The CIPP model for evaluation. In Evaluation models: View-points on educational and human services evaluation (hal. 279–317). Springer.

Sugiyono. (2023). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuanti-tatif, dan R&D (26 ed.). Alfabeta.

Sumarsih, I., Marliyani, T., Had-iyansah, Y., Hernawan, A. H., & Prihantini, P. (2022). Analisis implementasi kuriku-lum merdeka di sekolah penggerak sekolah dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(5), 8248–8258.

Suri, S., & Hariyati, N. (2024). CIPP evaluation model in the educational evaluation: A literature study. Cahaya Pendidikan, 10(1), 20–30.

Warju, W. (2016). Educational pro-gram evaluation using CIPP model. Invotec, 12(1).

Widiansyah, S., Hidayat, S. P., Kamil, S. I., Purba, I. D. L. B., Rahmawati, U., & Khairo, F. M. A. (2025). Kesiapan Guru dalam Menghadapi Tantangan Implementasi Ku-rikulum Merdeka:(Studi Ka-sus di Sekolah Menengah Atas). Harmoni Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 2(1), 344–362.

Wulan, M. P., Listyasari, W. D., Santosa, H., & Huda, S. A. (2026). A Systematic Litera-ture Review on the CIPP Evaluation Model in Educa-tion: Examining Its Trends, Applications, and Research Gaps. Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(3), 307–320.

Yam, J. H. (2024). Kajian penelitian: Tinjauan literatur sebagai metode penelitian. Jurnal Empire, 4(1), 61–70.

Zahroh, F. L., & Hilmiyati, F. (2024). Indikator keberhasi-lan dalam evaluasi program pendidikan: Success indica-tors in educational program evaluation. Edu Cendikia: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 4(03), 1052–1062.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-15