REPRESENTASI DAMPAK PENINDASAN TOKOH DALAM NOVEL PAYA NIE KARYA IDA FITRI: PERSPEKTIF HEGEMONI ANTONIO GRAMSCI

Authors

  • Verdyan Sahputra Universitas Islam Darul 'Ulum Lamongan
  • Bisarul Ihsan Universitas Islam Darul 'Ulum Lamongan
  • Laila Tri Lestari Universitas Islam Darul 'Ulum Lamongan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i03.60371

Keywords:

oppression, hegemony, Gramsci, psychological impacts, social impacts

Abstract

Practices of hegemony in Indonesia whether through government regulations that harm the public, a cultural legacy that normalizes injustice, or everyday forms of domination such as silencing and coercion have led to oppression being accepted as normal or “common sense.” This study aims to describe the psychological and social impacts of the oppression of characters in Ida Fitri’s novel Paya Nie from the perspective of Antonio Gramsci’s theory of hegemony. The method used is qualitative descriptive analysis grounded in Gramsci’s theory of hegemony, utilizing textual data from the novel Paya Nie. The results show that oppression causes trauma, fear, despair, and deep emotional wounds, and has social consequences such as stigma, the loss of solidarity, the breakdown of family structures, and the erosion of public trust. These impacts arise not only from physical violence but are also reinforced by ideologies and cultural norms that normalize domination as a natural state. The novel Paya Nie thus illustrates how hegemony operates on multiple levels in the daily lives of the Acehnese people during the conflict. This study underscores the role of literature as a critical medium for revealing the consequences of hegemony while fostering awareness of the importance of science and knowledge in combating oppression.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

orrigan, P. W., & Ditchman, A. R. B. (2024). The stigma effect: Unintended consequences of mental health campaigns. Columbia University Press.

Endraswara, S. (2013). Metodologi penelitian sastra: Epistemologi, model, teori, dan aplikasi. CAPS (Center for Academic Publishing Service).

Faruk. (2017). Metode Penelitian Sastra: Sebuah Penjelajahan Awal. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Firdaus, A., & Subagja, F. (2024). Menelaah perkembangan teori sastra Indonesia. Konsensus: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi, 1(5), 216–222. https://doi.org/10.62383/konsensus.v1i5.614

Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks (Q. Hoare & G. N. Smith, Eds. & Trans.). International Publishers.

Herman, J. L. (2022). Trauma and recovery: The aftermath of violence—From domestic abuse to political terror (4th ed.). Basic Books.

Herman, J. L. (2022). Trauma and recovery: The aftermath of violence From domestic abuse to political terror (Rev. ed.). Basic Books.

Loomba, A. (2005). Colonialism /Postcolonialism (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Moleong, L. J. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Pangestu, I. B., Suparmin, S., & Sudiatmi, T. (2023). Hegemoni kekuasaan dalam novel 86 karya Okky Madasari. Fon: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 19(2), 261–279.https://doi.org/10.25134/fon.v19i2.7861

Patria, N., & Arief, A. (2015). Antonio Gramsci: Negara dan hegemoni. Pustaka Pelajar.

Suhar. (2019).Novel sebagai Sumber Pemahaman Sejarah dan Kehidupan Sosial. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Ombak.

Van der Kolk, B. (2022). The body keeps the score: Brain, mind, and body in the healing of trauma. Penguin Books.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-10