INSTRUMEN PENELITIAN: JENIS, PENYUSUNAN, DAN PERANNYA DALAM MENJAMIN KUALITAS DATA

Authors

  • Rahmat Kurniawan STAIN Majene
  • Lili Agustina STAIN Majene
  • Sri Nilam Sari Hapil STAIN Majene
  • Nurmupidah STAIN Majene
  • Aan Setiawan STAIN Majene

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i03.60105

Keywords:

research instrument, validity, reliability

Abstract

Research quality is largely determined by the quality of the research instruments used to collect data. In practice, many novice researchers and students construct instruments carelessly, merely copying templates without adapting them to their research variables, and often skip the try-out stage. This condition is reflected in a 2024 Populix survey of 2,793 final-year Indonesian students, in which 45% admitted to manipulating thesis data. This article aims to examine the definition, types, systematic steps of construction, and testing procedures of research instruments through validity and reliability tests. This study uses a descriptive qualitative approach through library research, collecting data from research methodology books and national and international journal articles on research instruments, validity, and reliability published between 2011 and 2024, analyzed through content analysis. The results show that research instruments are divided into two major types: quantitative instruments (questionnaires, measurement scales, and tests) and qualitative instruments (the researcher as the main instrument, supported by interview guides, observation guides, and documentation guides). The construction of a good instrument follows five systematic steps: defining variables, formulating indicators, developing a blueprint, writing items, and validating content through expert judgment. Furthermore, the feasibility of an instrument must be confirmed through validity testing (content, construct, and empirical validity) and reliability testing (Cronbach's Alpha, KR-20, and KR-21). This article is expected to serve as a practical guide for novice researchers in constructing valid and reliable research instruments

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adlini. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Studi Pustaka. Jurnal Edumaspul, 6(1), 974.

Al Hafiz, A., Zulkifli, & Hadriana. (2022). Pengembangan Instrumen Self-Assessment untuk Mengukur Motivasi Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Pajar (Pendidikan dan Pengajaran), 6(1), 144–153.

Anindita S. H. M. Kusuma, Dadi Setiadi, B. S. H. (2023). Pengembangan Instrumen Questioning Skills Berdasarkan Domain Kognitif Taksonomi Bloom Revisi Untuk Evaluasi Kemampuan Bertanya Siswa SMA Pada Pembelajaran Biologi. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 8(4), 2668. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v8i4.1764

Ardiansyah, Risnita, & Jailani, M. S. (2023). Teknik Pengumpulan Data dan Instrumen Penelitian Ilmiah Pendidikan pada Pendekatan Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. IHSAN: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 1(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.61104/ihsan.v1i2.57

Arifin, Z. (2012). Penelitian Pendidikan: Metode dan Paradigma Baru. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Rineka Cipta.

Azwar, S. (2019). Reliabilitas dan Validitas. Pustaka Pelajar.

Creswell, J. (2016). Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Metode Campuran. Pustaka Pelajar.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5 ed.). SAGE Publications.

Fitriani, R., & Hakim, A. (2022). Analisis Kesalahan Penyusunan Instrumen Penelitian pada Skripsi Mahasiswa. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 28(1), 45.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 25 (9 ed.). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to Use and How to Report the Results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24.

Kusmaryono, I., Wijayanti, D., & Maharani, H. R. (2022). Number of Response Options, Reliability, Validity, and Potential Bias in the Use of the Likert Scale Education and Social Science Research: A Literature Review. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 8(4), 625–637. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.8.4.625

Mardapi, M. (2024). Desaim Instrumen Evaluasi yang Valid dan Reliabel dalam Pendidikan Islam Menggunakan Skala Likert. Jurnal Studi Multidisipliner, 8(12), 855–861.

McKim, C. (2022). Validity: Criterion, Concurrent, Ecological, and Predictive. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367198459-Reprw156-1

Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Populix. (2024). Survei: 45% Mahasiswa di Indonesia Nekat Manipulasi Data Skripsi untuk Lulus.https://hypeabis.id/read/32507/duh-ternyata-45-mahasiswa-di-indonesia-memanipulasi-data-skripsi

Ramadhan, M. F., Siroj, R. A., & Afgani, M. W. (2024). Validitas and Reliabilitas. Journal on Education, 6(2), 10967. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v6i2.4885

Rizaldy Fatha Pringgar, B. S. (2020). Penelitian Kepustakaan ( Library Research ) Modul Pembelajaran Berbasis Augmented Reality Pada Pembelajaran Siswa. Jurnal It-Edu, 5(1), 317–329. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26740/it-edu.v5i1.37489

Siregar, S. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif: Dilengkapi dengan Perbandingan Perhitungan Manual dan SPSS. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Subhaktiyasa, P. G. (2024). Evaluasi Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Penelitian Kuantitatif: Sebuah Studi Pustaka. Journal of Education Research, 5(4), 5599–5609. https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v5i4.1747

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Sukardi. (2013). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan: Kompetensi dan Praktiknya. Bumi Aksara.

Sukmadinata, N. S. (2015). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach ’ s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education., 3(0), 53. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd

Tumurang, M. (2024). Metodologi Penelitian. PT Media Pustaka Indo.

Widoyoko, E. P. (2012). Teknik Penyusunan Instrumen Penelitian. Pustaka Pelajar.

Yusup, F. (2018). Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Penelitian Kuantitatif. Tarbiyah: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 7(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.18592/tarbiyah.v7i1.2100

Downloads

Published

2026-07-29