ETNOGRAFI VIRTUAL PRAKTIK DIGITAL VIGILANTISM NETIZEN DI THREADS PADA KASUS TUMBLER TUKU

Authors

  • Seviola Dwi Ari Sandy Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jawa Timur
  • Augustin Mustika Chairil Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i03.59439

Keywords:

Digital vigilantism, Threads, Netizens, KAI, Tuku Tumbler

Abstract

This research is motivated by the Tuku Tumbler case, which was widely discussed on various social media. The netizens' responses, which tended to be against it, were prominent and even resulted in real consequences, such as the loss of a job for one of the parties involved. This case then received widespread attention from online media and was linked to the phenomenon of digital vigilantism. This study aims to analyze how digital vigilantism practices were carried out by netizens on Threads in the Tuku Tumbler case. The method used was a descriptive qualitative approach with virtual ethnography according to Christine Hine, and used Trottier's concept of digital vigilantism and Henry Jenkins' theory of participatory culture as the basis for analysis. Data were collected through observation and literature review. The results of the study indicate that digital vigilantism practices carried out by netizens include naming, shaming, online harassment, doxing, reporting to the workplace to get the target fired, and proposing a boycott of PT KAI to stop using train services. The targets were not only the main perpetrator, but also extended to other parties such as husbands and KAI staff. This practice manifests itself in various forms of digital expression, both verbal and nonverbal, as a form of collaboration among netizens to create a deterrent effect and exert social pressure, as a form of social sanction, as well as an effort to uphold justice and damage the target's reputation. Repost and share features also accelerate the spread of information. Netizen participation in this practice has been shown to have significant social and economic impacts on the targeted parties.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Buku :

Trottier, D., Gabdulhakov, R., & Huang, Q. (2020). Introducing Vigilant Audiences. Open Book Publisher.

Jurnal :

Afdal, A., Ningsih, T. P., Maharani, U. K., Vanessha, V., & Susanti, R. (2021). Perbedaan Kecendrungan Melakukan Ujaran Kebencian (Hate Speech) Antara Laki-Laki Dan Perempuan. Jurnal Konseling Komprehensif: Kajian Teori Dan Praktik Bimbingan Dan Konseling, 8(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.36706/jkk.v8i2.15425

Akbar, M. F., Tamara, G. M. A. J., & Hazel, M. (2026). Siber-Vigilantlisme Pada Media Sosial dan Legitimasi Keadilan. Seminar Nasional Pariwisata Dan Kewirausahaan (SNPK), 5, 183–194.

Charolin, M., Valiza, I., Sani Harahap, M. F., Afarrel, M. R., Br Manurung, A. S., Gafari, O. F., & Puspitarini, H. (2026). Fenomena Tumbler Tuku di KAI Dalam Perspektif Cyber Pragmatik. BADASYA : Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Budaya, 02(1), 31–38.

Elvina Ekga, F., hafida Pangastuti, N., Paramitha, A., & Iwan. (2026). Vigilantisme Digital NCTzen: Praktik Cancel Culture Kasus Moon Taeil. Jurnal Media Dan Komunikasi Indonesia, 7(1), 1–166.

Genggam, R. M., Bintang, S., Bahytsani, D. A., & Mudzakkar, A. A. (2024). Analisis Bukti Digital Forensik pada Aplikasi Threads Menggunakan Metode Digital Forensic Research Workshop. FAHMA - Jurnal Informatika Komputer, Bisnis Dan Manajemen, 22(2), 1–10.

Halimah, Ayuningrum, N. G., & Romadhan, M. I. (2026). Praktik Partisipasi Fandom Holo Pada Masa Perilisan dan Promosi Solo di Instagram @haechanoona (Studi Etnografi Virtual). Journal of Socio Verba Humanica, 1(1), 104–111.

Irawan. (2018). Hate Speech di Indonesia : Bahaya dan Solusi. Mawa’Izh: Jurnal Dakwah Dan Pengembangan Sosial Kemanusiaan, 9(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.32923/maw.v9i1.712

Jane, E. A. (2016). Online Misogyny and Feminist Digilantism. Continuum, 30(3), 284–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2016.1166560

Jelita, A., & Akhirul, N. (2024). Vigilantisme Digital dalam Aksi Boikot Produk Israel di Media Sosial. Jurnal Komunikasi Nusantara, 6, 145–160.

Kusumawati, T. I. (2015). Komunikasi Verbal Dan Nonverbal. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling, 6(2), 58–98.

Loveluck, B. (2021). The Many Shades of Digital vigilantism. A Typology of Online Self-Justice. Global Crime, 21(3–4), 213–241.

Muflichah, H. S. (2022). Cyberbullying Dalam Permainan Interaktif Berbasis Online. AKRB : Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Akademi Komunikasi Radya Binatama, 7(1), 1–20.

Octora, R., & Andersen, C. (2026). Online Shaming as a Form of Digital Persecution, Legal Issue on Protection of Dignity and Privacy Rights of Victims in Indonesian Legal Framework. Tec Empresarial, 716–739.

Prasetya, A., Retnasary, M., & Azhar, D. A. (2022). Pola Perilaku Bermedia Sosial Netizen Indonesia Menyikapi Pemberitaan Viral Di Media Sosial. JDCODE : Journal Of Digital Communication And Design, 1(1), 1–12.

Putri, D. H. (2023). Pengaruh Doxing terhadap Mentalitas Korban Pengaruh Doxing terhadap Mentalitas Korban.

Santosa, D. R. (2023). Digital Discourses Mengenai Fenomena Cancel Culture Saipul Jamil dalam Media Sosial TikTok. JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(12), 10272–10276. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v6i12.3411

Trottier, D. (2020). Denunciation and Doxing: Towards a Conceptual Model of Digital Vigilantism. Global Crime, 21(3–4), 196–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/17440572.2019.1591952

Widiastuti, N. (2019). Berita Viral di Media Sosial Sebagai Sumber Informasi Media Massa Konvensional. JDMR : Jurnal Digital Media & Relationship, 1(1), 23–30.

Zain. (n.d.). Definisi dan Bentuk Cyber Bullying. Id.Scribd.Com. Retrieved June 20, 2026, from https://id.scribd.com/document/468398244/Pengertian-Cyber-Bullying

Downloads

Published

2026-07-17