AN ERROR ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH MONOPHTHONG PRONUNCIATION AMONG FOURTH SEMESTER STUDENTS IN AN ENGLISH EDUCATION PROGRAM

Authors

  • Rahma Alya Putri Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang
  • Kusrin Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang
  • Kelik Wachyudi Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i03.58891

Keywords:

error analysis, pronunciation, English monophthongs

Abstract

Pronunciation has a central place in oral communication because listeners do not only hear words, they also interpret meaning through the clarity of sounds. Many learners of English as a foreign language still find English vowels difficult to produce, especially monophthongs that are not clearly represented in the Indonesian vowel system. This study aimed to identify the types of errors found in students’ pronunciation of English monophthongs, to determine the vowel sounds that were most frequently mispronounced, and to examine the possible sources of those errors. The study used a basic qualitative design supported by simple frequency counts. The participants were 15 fourth semester students in an English Language Education Program at a university in Karawang who had completed a Phonetics and Phonology course. Data were gathered through a pronunciation test and semi structured interviews. The pronunciation data were transcribed with the International Phonetic Alphabet and then classified by using the surface strategy taxonomy. The findings showed 144 pronunciation errors. Misformation, understood in this study as vowel substitution, appeared 143 times or 99.3 percent, while omission appeared only once or 0.7 percent. The monophthongs most often mispronounced were /ɔː/ at 25.7%, /æ/ at 24.3%, /uː/ at 23.6%, and /iː/ at 11.8%. The interviews suggested that interlingual transfer and intralingual transfer were the most visible sources of error, while learning context and communication strategies also shaped the students’ pronunciation in smaller ways. The study indicates that differences between Indonesian and English vowel systems, particularly vowel quality and vowel length, still create considerable difficulty for university EFL learners.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adinda, M., & Ahmad, Z. (2024). The importance of teaching English pronunciation by using English in Mind textbook. Prosiding Konferensi Linguistik Tahunan Atma Jaya (KOLITA), 22, 233–238. doi:10.25170/kolita.22.5979

Al Abdely, A. A. W. A. (2023). Vowel length variation in the pronunciation of Iraqi EFL learners. Elsya: Journal of English Language Studies, 5(2), 185–203. doi:10.31849/elsya.v5i2.13856

Al-Shalabi, F. (2021). Phonological errors and L1 interference: A case study of Jordanian learners of English as a foreign language. Journal of Studies in Education, 11(3), 116–125. doi:10.5296/jse.v11i3.18819

Almusharraf, A., Aljasser, A., Mahdi, H. S., Al-Nofaie, H., & Ghobain, E. (2024). Exploring the effects of modality and variability on EFL learners’ pronunciation of English diphthongs: A student perspective on HVPT implementation. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 141. doi:10.1057/s41599-024-02632-2

Andestopano, A., & Datuk, Z. D. M. (2024). The phonological deviations: An error analysis of the Indonesian EFL learners’ pronunciation. Vivid: Journal of Language and Literature, 13(2), 195–201. doi:10.25077/vj.13.2.195-201.2024

Bassetti, B. (2024). Orthographic effects in the phonetics and phonology of second language learners and users. In M. Amengual (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of bilingual phonetics and phonology (pp. 699–720). Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781009105767.032

Bassetti, B., Cerni, T., & Masterson, J. (2022). The efficacy of grapheme-phoneme correspondence instruction in reducing the effect of orthographic forms on second language phonology. Applied Psycholinguistics, 43(3), 683–705. doi:10.1017/S014271642200008X

Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In O.-S. Bohn & M. J. Munro (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (pp. 13–34). John Benjamins. doi:10.1075/lllt.17.07bes

Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). Pearson Longman.

Dandee, W., & Pornwiriyakit, P. (2022). Improving English pronunciation skills by using English phonetic alphabet drills in EFL students. Journal of Educational Issues, 8(1), 611–628. doi:10.5296/jei.v8i1.19851

Dulay, H., Burt, M., & Krashen, S. (1982). Language two. Oxford University Press.

Escudero, P., & Yazawa, K. (2024). The second language linguistic perception model. In M. Amengual (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of bilingual phonetics and phonology (pp. 173–195). Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781009105767.009

Flege, J. E., & Bohn, O.-S. (2021). The revised Speech Learning Model (SLM-r). In R. Wayland (Ed.), Second language speech learning: Theoretical and empirical progress (pp. 3–83). Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108886901.002

Lee, K., & Ahn, H. (2025). Blended phonetic training with HVPT features for EFL children: Effects on L2 perception and listening comprehension. Languages, 10(6), 122. doi:10.3390/languages10060122

Levis, J. M. (2018). Intelligibility, oral communication, and the teaching of pronunciation. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108241564

Mahdi, H. S., & Mohsen, M. A. (2024). Enhancing pronunciation learning through high variability phonetic training: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 40, 29–45. doi:10.32038/ltrq.2024.40.02

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Nagle, C. L., & Baese-Berk, M. M. (2022). Advancing the state of the art in L2 speech perception-production research: Revisiting theoretical assumptions and methodological practices. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 44(2), 580–605. doi:10.1017/S0272263121000371

Nurjannah, Jannah, M., Zuhra, I., & Wati, F. (2023). Using PRAAT in teaching the monophthongs to the EFL students in Indonesia. Scope: Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(2), 232–239. doi:10.30998/scope.v7i2.16027

Reskiawan, B., Abin, R., & Riyani, N. (2026). English pronunciation problems among Indonesian students of English as a foreign language at university level: A descriptive analysis. Journal of English Language and Education, 11(2), 828–836. doi:10.31004/jele.v11i2.2237

Riza, A., & Kawakib, A. N. (2021). Utilizing the phonetic transcription of IPA (International Phonetic Alphabet) to avoid EFL students’ mis-pronunciation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Social Science (pp. 464–468). Atlantis Press. doi:10.2991/assehr.k.210421.067

Roach, P. (2009). English phonetics and phonology: A practical course (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Sayogie, F., & Adbaka, M. F. (2022). Interlingual errors in Indonesian EFL learners’ pronunciation: From minimal pairs to speaking ability. Elsya: Journal of English Language Studies, 4(2), 131–146. doi:10.31849/elsya.v4i2.9693

Shepperd, L. (2024). Cross-scriptal orthographic influence on second language phonology. Languages, 9(6), 210. doi:10.3390/languages9060210

Silalahi, M., Sibuea, B., Silalahi, T. F., & Purba, A. (2025). Pronunciation errors in reading text made by students of English Language Education Department. Journal of English Language and Education, 10(6), 406–411. doi:10.31004/jele.v10i6.1684

Thomson, R. I., & Derwing, T. M. (2015). The effectiveness of L2 pronunciation instruction: A narrative review. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 326–344. doi:10.1093/applin/amu076

Yağız, O., Kaya, F., & Ötügen, R. (2024). The effectiveness of L2 pronunciation instruction: A critical systematic review of the intervention studies. The Literacy Trek, 10(1), 21–41. doi:10.47216/literacytrek.1487243

Yulianti, L. D., Marhum, M., & Kamaruddin, A. (2025). Pronunciation problems of English segmental sounds encountered by EFL learners of English Education Study Program. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Undiksha, 13(1), 124–139. doi:10.23887/jpbi.v13i1.86838

Yusuf, Y. Q., Aziz, Z. A., Nurjannah, & Pillai, S. (2024). The sounds of Indonesian English: Acoustic phonetic analysis of the monophthong vowels across genders. TEFLIN Journal, 35(1), 169–192. doi:10.15639/teflinjournal.v35i1/169-192

Downloads

Published

2026-07-24