PARADIGMA FENOMENOLOGI DALAM STUDI ETIKA AKUNTAN TERHADAP KONSTRUKSI MAKNA DAN PENDEKATAN PENELITIAN

Authors

  • Darwis Said Universitas Hasanuddin
  • Arifuddin Universitas Hasanuddin
  • Huriyn Putri Askiah Juhari Universitas Hasanuddin
  • Inayah Chintaki MZ Universitas Hasanuddin
  • Irwan Pratama Universitas Hasanuddin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i02.58856

Keywords:

Phenomenology; Accountant Ethics; Meaning Construction; Qualitative Research; Subjective Experience.

Abstract

Accountant ethics is a fundamental aspect of accounting practice because it is directly related to public trust in the accounting profession. Various cases of financial statement manipulation, abuse of authority, and violations of ethical codes demonstrate that an understanding of ethics cannot be reduced merely to compliance with formal rules. In this context, the phenomenological paradigm offers an alternative perspective for understanding how accountants construct the meaning of ethics based on their lived experiences. This article aims to explain the phenomenological paradigm in the study of accountant ethics by highlighting the construction of meaning, philosophical assumptions, and research approaches employed. The research method discussed is grounded in a qualitative phenomenological approach that seeks to explore accountants’ subjective experiences regarding the ethical dilemmas they encounter. The findings indicate that the meaning of ethics for accountants is shaped through the interaction of personal values, organizational culture, professional pressures, and work experience. The phenomenological paradigm enables researchers to understand ethical reality as a lived experience rather than merely a set of normative rules. Therefore, phenomenology makes an important contribution to enriching the study of accounting ethics by providing a deeper understanding of the consciousness and subjective experiences of accounting professionals.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Creswell, J. W. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Sage Publications.

Husserl, E. (1970). The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. Northwestern University Press.

Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and Time. Harper & Row.

Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological Research Methods. Sage Publications.

Schutz, A. (1967). The Phenomenology of the Social World. Northwestern University Press.

Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia. (2024). Kode Etik Akuntan Indonesia.

Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., & Beasley, M. S. (2022). Auditing and Assurance Services. Pearson.

Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis. Heinemann.

Chua, W. F. (1986). Radical Developments in Accounting Thought. The Accounting Review, 61(4), 601–632.

Suryanto, T., Nugroho, A., & Pratama, R. (2022). The role of artificial intelligence in accounting efficiency and fraud detection. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 46(1), 100567.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30