CHATBOT AI SEBAGAI DIGITAL SCAFFOLDING UNTUK MENDUKUNG SELF-REGULATED LEARNING PADA PEMBELAJARAN INKUIRI DI SEKOLAH DASAR

Authors

  • Atania Rosbina Br Bangun
  • Thresia yohana Sembiring
  • Nurhayati
  • Suryani

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i03.58714

Keywords:

AI chatbot, digital scaffolding, learning independence

Abstract

The low level of learning independence among elementary school students, as reflected in excessive dependence on teacher instructions, limited initiative in exploration, and weak self-monitoring skills during the inquiry process, has become a fundamental issue that has not been systematically addressed through appropriate educational technology approaches. This study aimed to examine the effect of using an AI chatbot as digital scaffolding on improving the learning independence of fifth-grade elementary school students in the subject of Mathematics through the inquiry learning model. The study employed a quasi-experimental research method with a Nonequivalent Control Group Design, involving 60 fifth-grade students from SDN 060914 Sunggal who were divided into two groups, consisting of 30 students in the experimental class and 30 students in the control class, selected through purposive sampling. The research instruments included a four-point Likert-scale learning independence questionnaire, an inquiry activity observation sheet, and chatbot interaction documentation. The results showed that the average learning independence score in the experimental class increased from 61.23 to 79.87 with an N-gain of 0.52 (moderate category), while the control class only achieved an N-gain of 0.24. The independent samples t-test produced a value of t = 6.14 with p < 0.001, and Cohen’s d effect size of 1.14, which was categorized as large. These findings indicate that AI chatbots positioned as digital scaffolding significantly facilitate the development of elementary students’ learning independence, particularly through adaptive prompting mechanisms, guiding questions, and immediate feedback that support self-regulated learning processes within the*inquiry learning framework.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012

Baidoo-Anu, D., & Ansah, L. O. (2023). Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Journal of AI, 7(1), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.61969/jai.1337500

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Guan, Q., Liu, Z., & Chen, Y. (2025). How educational chatbots support self-regulated learning? A systematic review of the literature. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12881-y

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809

Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368

Huang, J., Saleh, S., & Liu, Y. (2022). A review on artificial intelligence in education. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 11(3), 206–216. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2022-0060

Jauhiainen, J. S., & Guerra, A. (2024). Generative AI and education: Dynamic personalization of pupils’ school learning material with ChatGPT. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1288723. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1288723

Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Keputusan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Nomor 56/M/2022 tentang pedoman penerapan kurikulum dalam rangka pemulihan pembelajaran. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.

Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1

Lee, H. Y., Hwang, G. J., & Chen, C. H. (2025). Technology-based interactive guidance to promote learning performance and self-regulation: A chatbot-assisted self-regulated learning approach. Educational Technology Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-025-10478-x

Roll, I., & Wylie, R. (2016). Evolution and revolution in artificial intelligence in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26(2), 582–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0110-3

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wollny, S., Schneider, J., Di Mitri, D., Weidlich, J., Rittberger, M., & Drachsler, H. (2021). Are we there yet? A systematic literature review on chatbots in education. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 4, 654924. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.654924

Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x

Wu, T. T., & Chiu, P. S. (2025). Integrating learner characteristics and generative AI affordances to enhance self-regulated learning. Smart Learning Environments, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-025-00308-7

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education: Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(39), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

Downloads

Published

2026-07-03