ANALISIS KUALITAS SOAL BAHASA INDONESIA BERBASIS TAKSONOMI BLOOM REVISI PADA PLATFORM QUIZIZZ UNTUK PESERTA DIDIK SMP

Authors

  • Hayatun Nufus Universitas PGRI Palembang
  • Rika Sulistia Universitas PGRI Palembang
  • Agis Ratna Dewi Universitas PGRI Palembang
  • Hairo Yaro Universitas PGRI Palembang
  • Rahma Puspitasari Universitas PGRI Palembang
  • Tiara Hati Universitas PGRI Palembang
  • Aisya Dina Setiawati Universitas PGRI Palembang
  • Nabila Natania Putri Marina Universitas PGRI Palembang
  • Alya Rama Dani Universitas PGRI Palembang
  • Olivia Putri Ramadani Universitas PGRI Palembang
  • Riska Universitas PGRI Palembang
  • Ririn Aulia Riani
  • Fadilah Indah Sari Universitas PGRI Palembang
  • Robiah Universitas PGRI Palembang
  • Putri Wulandari Universitas PGRI Palembang
  • Sesilia Ceca Olivia Universitas PGRI Palembang
  • Putri Natasya Universitas PGRI Palembang
  • Winsi Aprilia Universitas PGRI Palembang
  • Imelda Anggraini Universitas PGRI Palembang
  • Faza Utami Universitas PGRI Palembang
  • Gita Agustina Universitas PGRI Palembang
  • Fitri Anisa Universitas PGRI Palembang
  • Adelia Pratiwi Universitas PGRI Palembang
  • Jimi Pernando Universitas PGRI Palembang
  • Salsabilah Universitas PGRI Palembang
  • Tera Sulastri Universitas PGRI Palembang
  • Meila Sundari Universitas PGRI Palembang
  • Irsya Gala Aprilia Universitas PGRI Palembang
  • Riken Iles Pahmi Universitas PGRI Palembang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i03.57756

Keywords:

learning assessment, test item quality, Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy, Quizizz, Indonesian language.

Abstract

The Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy developed by Anderson and Krathwohl (2001) classifies cognitive processes into six hierarchical levels from C1 (remembering) to C6 (creating), divided into lower-order thinking skills (LOTS) and higher-order thinking skills (HOTS). The problem underlying this study was the lack of adequate examination of Indonesian language question quality on digital learning platforms based on the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy, leaving the extent to which these items measure students’ thinking skills uncertain. This study aimed to analyze the quality of Indonesian language test items on the Quizizz platform based on the cognitive levels of the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. A descriptive qualitative approach with content analysis method was applied to 40 multiple-choice Indonesian language test items for junior high school level, collected through documentation techniques and classified into C1–C6 levels and knowledge dimensions of the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. The results showed that cognitive level distribution was dominated by C2 (understanding) at 37.5% and C4 (analyzing) at 32.5%, while C1 (remembering) appeared only at 2.5%. The LOTS and HOTS proportion achieved a balanced ratio of 50:50, exceeding the minimum standard set by the Ministry of Education. In terms of knowledge dimension, items were dominated by conceptual knowledge (32.5%) and procedural knowledge (30.0%), while factual knowledge had the lowest percentage (17.5%). However, C3 (applying) representation remained low at 10.0%, indicating that the cognitive ladder from C1 to C6 has not yet been built in a fully gradual manner. It is concluded that the quality of Indonesian language test items on the Quizizz platform aligns with the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy in terms of LOTS-HOTS balance, although the distribution across cognitive levels, particularly C3, still requires improvement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aini, R., Nyoman Karma, I., & Hamdian Affandi, L. (2023). Kesulitan guru dalam menyusun soal evaluasi berbasis higher order thinking skills dalam pembelajaran Kurikulum 2013. Educatio, 9(4), 2062–2069. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives (Complete ed.). New York: Longman. Astina, T., Wardiah, D., Ali, M., Santos, J. M., Villanueva, K. M., & Bautista, L. G. (2025). Pengembangan lembar kerja peserta didik (LKPD) berbasis proyek terhadap kemampuan siswa merancang dan membuat sebuah produk dalam pembelajaran eksposisi. Jurnal Pembahsi (Pembelajaran Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia), 15(1), 6073. Astuti, F. (2021). Analisis ranah kognitif taksonomi Bloom revisi pada soal ujian sekolah Bahasa Jawa. Piwulang: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Jawa, 9(1), 83–99. Cressa, J., & Mukhlis, M. (2023). Level kognitif taksonomi Bloom pada soal mata pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. J-LELC: Journal of Language Education, Linguistics, and Culture, 3(1), 55–62. Gunawan, I., & Anggarini, R. P. (2016). Taksonomi Bloom revisi ranah kognitif: Kerangka landasan untuk pembelajaran, pengajaran, dan penilaian. Premiere Educandum: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar dan Pembelajaran, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.25273/pe.v2i02. 50 Hasiana, I., & Pitasari, A. R. M. (2025). Evaluasi pembelajaran berbasis taksonomi Bloom dalam mengembangkan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa. Indonesian Journal on Education (IJoEd), 1(4), 411–417. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. Nafiati, D. A. (2021). Revisi taksonomi Bloom: Kognitif, afektif, dan psikomotorik. Humanika, 21(2), 151–172. Sijabat, M. P., Hutabarat, K., Sitorus, L., & Syahrial, S. (2024). Analisis soal tes hasil belajar siswa soal berstandar nasional Bahasa Indonesia kelas 5 sekolah dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 8(2), 1265–1277. Wulandari, K., & Mulyati, Y. (2023). Level kognitif soal dalam buku Bahasa Indonesia kelas X terbitan Kemendikbudristek berdasarkan taksonomi Anderson dan Krathwohl. Bahastra: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 8(1), 9–14.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-11