INTERVENSI KEBIJAKAN PENDIDIKAN DALAM MENANGKAL TOKSISITAS DIGITAL EVALUASI RESTRIKSI GAWAI TERHADAP RESILIENSI SOSIAL DAN KOGNITIF PELAJAR DI KOTA BOGOR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i03.57411Keywords:
Surveillance Capitalism, Street-Level Bureaucracy, Gadget Restriction, Cognitive Resilience, Collaborative Governance, Social Capital.Abstract
The invasion of surveillance capitalism into educational spaces has triggered an attention crisis and weakened students’ cognitive resilience. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of smartphone restriction policies implemented at SMAN 5, SMAN 6, and SMAN 9 Bogor City as a bureaucratic intervention to mitigate digital toxicity. The research employed a mixed methods approach using a concurrent triangulation strategy by integrating the perspectives of street-level bureaucracy, developmental psychology, and collaborative governance. Primary data were collected through structured questionnaires and narrative notes from teachers and students, which were analyzed integratively to evaluate policy implementation. The findings indicate that smartphone restriction policies successfully established a high level of administrative compliance, although implementation challenges remained due to teachers’ discretionary decisions arising from tensions between rule enforcement and digitally oriented learning needs. From a psychological perspective, students experienced withdrawal symptoms as a consequence of reduced digital access; however, they gradually demonstrated improvements in learning focus, emotional stability, and social interaction. The study also revealed a collaboration paradox in which parental support for school policies was normatively high but was not accompanied by consistent supervision of smartphone use at home. These findings confirm that smartphone restriction is not merely a disciplinary instrument but a form of social engineering that requires collaborative educational governance to develop a sustainable cognitive recovery ecosystem in the era of digital disruption.
Downloads
References
Agresti, A., & Finlay, B. (2009). Statistical Methods for the Social Sciences. Pearson.
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dunn, W. N. (2018). Public policy analysis: An integrated approach (6th ed.). Routledge.
Haidt, J. (2024). The anxious generation: How the great rewiring of childhood is causing an epidemic of mental illness. Penguin Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.