PENGGUNAAN CHATGPT DALAM MEMBANTU PROSES TANYA JAWAB MAHASISWA: STUDI KASUS KELAS IV D PGSD UNIVERSITAS NUSA CENDANA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i03.57163Keywords:
ChatGPT, artificial intelligence, question-and-answer process, higher education, critical thinkingAbstract
The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology, particularly ChatGPT, has significantly transformed learning practices in higher education. Many university students now utilize ChatGPT to assist various academic activities, including the question-and-answer process during lectures. However, excessive reliance on this technology raises concerns regarding the development of students’ critical thinking and academic independence. This study aims to examine how ChatGPT is used by fourth-semester students of Class IV D, Elementary School Teacher Education (PGSD) at Universitas Nusa Cendana (UNDANA), its perceived benefits, and its impact on the question-and-answer learning process. This study employed a qualitative approach with a case study design. Data were collected through direct observation during lectures and semi-structured interviews with students and the course lecturer. Data analysis followed the Miles and Huberman model, comprising data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings indicate that students use ChatGPT across multiple learning contexts, including completing assignments, searching for references, preparing for discussions, and seeking rapid answers during question-and-answer sessions. The primary benefits reported include faster information retrieval, simplified explanations of complex material, increased self-confidence in answering lecturers’ questions, and improved academic communication skills. However, concerns were identified regarding potential negative impacts, namely reduced critical thinking ability and the emergence of AI dependency. Students demonstrated awareness of the need to verify ChatGPT’s responses against academic sources. It is concluded that ChatGPT serves as a beneficial supplementary learning tool, provided its use is accompanied by critical thinking, digital literacy, and continued engagement with credible academic references.
Downloads
References
Baidoo-Anu, D., & Ansah, L. O. (2023). Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Journal of AI, 7(1), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.61969/jai.1337500
Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating? Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., … Wright, R. (2023). So what if ChatGPT wrote it? Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, Article 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
Firat, M. (2023). How ChatGPT can transform autodidactic experiences and open education. Open Praxis, 15(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.15.1.579
Hamalik, O. (2021). Proses belajar mengajar. Bumi Aksara.
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeiffer, F., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, Article 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Lestari, R., & Handayani, S. (2022). Faktor-faktor yang memengarƃuhi partisipasi mahasiswa dalam kegiatan tanya jawab di kelas. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 3(2), 112–120.
Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410
Mardiah, N., & Sari, D. P. (2022). Pengaruh metode diskusi terhadap kemampuan argumentasi mahasiswa dalam pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 29(1), 45–53.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldãna, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Moleong, L. J. (2021). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (Edisi revisi). PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nurhayati, E., Rahmawati, D., & Putra, A. (2023). Interaksi aktif mahasiswa dalam pembelajaran dan pengaruhnya terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis. Jurnal Pendidikan Tinggi, 14(2), 89–99.
Putri, A. N., Hidayat, R., & Kurniawan, M. (2023). Keaktifan mahasiswa dalam pembelajaran berbasis diskusi di perguruan tinggi. Jurnal Edukasi, 12(1), 66–75.
Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 342–363. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9
Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Alfabeta.
Suryani, N., & Agung, L. (2022). Strategi pembelajaran: Teori dan implementasi. Ombak.
Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel? ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
