REKONSTRUKSI INSTRUMEN HOTS DALAM PEMBELAJARAN PAI BERBASIS TAKSONOMI ANDERSON DAN PENALARAN ETIK ISLAMI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i02.55971Keywords:
Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS); Islamic Religious Education; Anderson’s Taxonomy; Islamic Ethical Reasoning; Instrument ReconstructionAbstract
The growing emphasis on Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) in Islamic Religious Education (IRE) calls for assessment practices that foster not only cognitive competence but also ethical judgment grounded in Islamic values. Existing HOTS assessment instruments, however, remain largely confined to cognitive dimensions. This study reconstructs a HOTS assessment framework by integrating Anderson's Taxonomy with Islamic ethical reasoning through a qualitative library research design and conceptual analysis. The analysis synthesizes theories of HOTS, Islamic ethical reasoning, and previous studies to formulate a new conceptual framework. The findings reveal that current HOTS assessments in IRE inadequately measure students' ability to identify Islamic values, weigh maslahah and mafsadah, construct Sharia-based arguments, and make ethically informed decisions. The proposed Cognitive-Ethical HOTS framework extends conventional cognitive assessment by incorporating ethical reasoning, offering a more holistic and contextually relevant model for evaluating intellectual and moral competencies in Islamic Religious Education.
Downloads
References
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
Ananda, R., & Maemonah. (2022). HOTS assessment model in Islamic Religious Education learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 11(2), 145–158.
Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. ASCD.
Fauzi, A., & Hidayat, T. (2023). Authentic assessment in Islamic Religious Education: Challenges and opportunities. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 20(1), 55–72.
Haladyna, T. M. (2004). Developing and validating multiple-choice test items (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Halimah, N. (2021). Higher-order thinking skills assessment in Islamic Religious Education. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Indonesia, 6(1), 33–47.
Hidayat, R., & Rahman, M. (2024). Integrating higher-order thinking skills into Islamic education curriculum. International Journal of Islamic Educational Studies, 8(1), 75–91.
Iqbal, M., Suryana, A., & Hasanah, U. (2025). Characteristics of HOTS questions in Islamic Religious Education assessment. Journal of Islamic Learning, 3(1), 25–39.
Jannah, N., & Yusuf, A. (2024). Developing authentic assessment in Islamic Religious Education. Al-Ta'dib: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Kependidikan, 17(2), 183–197.
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212–218.
Lestari, D., & Suyadi. (2021). Higher-order thinking skills in Islamic education learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 10(2), 95–108.
Listiani, R., & Rachmawati, Y. (2022). Implementation of Anderson taxonomy in HOTS assessment. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 13(1), 45–59.
Mariam, S., Rahman, A., & Huda, M. (2022). HOTS assessment and critical thinking development in Islamic education. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 6(3), 211–223.
Nasir, M., Fauzan, A., & Ilham, M. (2025). HOTS-based learning innovation in Islamic Religious Education. Tarbiyatuna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 16(1), 1–18.
Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2014). Educational assessment of students (7th ed.). Pearson.
Pakpahan, E., Siregar, A., & Simanjuntak, D. (2021). Analysis of reading comprehension questions based on revised Bloom taxonomy. Journal of Language Teaching and Assessment, 5(2), 88–101.
Pebriani, R., Susanti, D., & Wahyuni, N. (2022). Development of HOTS-based electronic worksheets for secondary education. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 24(3), 301–315.
Qudsiah, L., & Hayati, S. (2023). Development of higher-order thinking skills assessment instruments in Islamic education. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan Islam, 9(2), 121–136.
Rahman, A., & Rusnayati, H. (2021). Analysis of HOTS assessment characteristics using item response theory. International Journal of Assessment Studies, 4(1), 33–46.
Ridwan, M., & Hasanah, I. (2024). Ethical reasoning in Islamic education: A conceptual review. Journal of Islamic Education and Ethics, 2(1), 15–31.
Sani, R. A. (2023). Critical thinking and higher-order thinking skills in classroom assessment. Jurnal Pendidikan Modern, 14(2), 67–82.
Sholeh, M., Azizah, N., & Karim, A. (2025). Metacognitive ability and HOTS assessment in Islamic education. Journal of Islamic Learning and Teaching, 2(3), 44–58.
Suyadi, S., & Widodo, H. (2022). Neuroscience approach to higher-order thinking skills in Islamic education. International Journal of Instruction, 15(4), 1021–1038.
Umah, M. A. (2025). Higher-order thinking skills (HOTS)-based learning in Islamic Religious Education. World Journal of Islamic Learning and Teaching, 2(3), 43–49.
Wahidin, W. (2023). Development of HOTS assessment instruments in Indonesian education. Jurnal Evaluasi Pembelajaran, 8(2), 101–116.
Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. Jossey-Bass.
Widana, I. W. (2021). Higher order thinking skills assessment. Indonesian Ministry of Education Press.
Yusuf, M., & Anwar, S. (2023). Islamic moral reasoning and educational assessment. Journal of Islamic Ethics and Education, 5(2), 88–103.
Zubaedi. (2022). Pendidikan Islam berbasis karakter. Kencana.
Auda, J. (2008). Maqasid al-shariah as philosophy of Islamic law: A systems approach. The International Institute of Islamic Thought.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
