MENGURAI HAMBATAN DAN STRATEGI GURU SEKOLAH DASAR DALAM MENGIMPLEMENTASIKAN ASESMEN FORMATIF KURIKULUM MERDEKA DI KECAMATAN PAGUYANGAN KABUPATEN BREBES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i03.55806Keywords:
Formative Assessment, Kurikulum Merdeka, Elementary SchoolAbstract
The implementation of formative assessment in Kurikulum Merdeka often reveals a gap between policy idealism and operational realities in the field, particularly in suburban areas. This study aims to analyze the obstacles and map the coping mechanisms independently initiated by elementary school teachers in Paguyangan District, Brebes Regency. This study employed a qualitative approach with a descriptive case study design. Data were obtained from four classroom teachers selected through a purposive sampling technique. Data collection was conducted through a combination of in-depth interviews, non-participant observations, and document analysis. Furthermore, the data were analyzed using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña and validated through source and technique triangulation. The findings indicate three major obstacles in implementing formative assessment: limited operational time due to curriculum coverage demands, students' low readiness for self-reflection, and a passive learning culture among students. To overcome these constraints, teachers exercised their instructional autonomy (teacher agency) through three tactical strategies. First, they simplified complex evaluation rubrics into practical checklist sheets. Second, they modified self-assessment instruments using child-friendly emoticons. Third, they optimized the Learning Community (Kombel) within the sub-district Teacher Working Group (KKG) to share administrative burdens. This study concludes that granting flexibility to frontline teachers is key to overcoming curriculum implementation barriers in local regions. This study recommends that local policymakers shift teacher mentoring patterns toward a more practical and contextual supervision model.
Downloads
References
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and production of learning: A symbolic relationship. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 551-575.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Earl, L. M. (2013). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning. Corwin Press.
Faiz, A., Prasetiadi, R., & Kurniawaty, I. (2022). Pembelajaran berdiferensiasi dalam Kurikulum Merdeka. Jurnal Edukasi Dan Sains, 4(2), 284-293.
Hadi, S., Retnawati, H., & Munadi, S. (2023). Penguatan kompetensi guru sekolah dasar dalam menyusun instrumen asesmen formatif Kurikulum Merdeka. Jurnal Basicedu, 7(1), 455-466.
Heritage, M. (2021). Formative assessment: Making it happen in the classroom. Corwin Press.
Inayati, U., Sholihah, M., & Rosyidi, A. (2023). Problematika guru SD dalam mengimplementasikan asesmen Kurikulum Merdeka. Jurnal Elemen, 9(2), 112-125.
Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Panduan pembelajaran dan asesmen pendidikan anak usia dini, pendidikan dasar, dan pendidikan menengah. Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Pahrul, Y., & Rasmitadila, R. (2024). Tantangan guru sekolah dasar dalam menerapkan penilaian formatif pada Kurikulum Merdeka. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Nusantara, 9(2), 201-215.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Pratama, A. A., Yusuf, M., & Sunardi, S. (2023). Analisis kendala guru sekolah dasar di wilayah sub-urban dalam pelaksanaan asesmen Kurikulum Merdeka. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 10(2), 189-204.
Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher agency: An ecological approach. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Rahayu, R., Rosita, R., & Rahayuningsih, Y. S. (2022). Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar di Sekolah Penggerak. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(4), 6313-6319.
Sari, D. P. (2024). Reduksi makna asesmen formatif: Studi administrasi mengajar guru SD. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 8(1), 34-47.
Sibagariang, D., Sihotang, H., & Murniarti, E. (2023). Peran guru penggerak dalam pembentukan karakter siswa pada Kurikulum Merdeka. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 7(1), 1205-1215.
Siregar, N., Simamora, R., & Naibaho, T. (2024). Kebijakan transformasi asesmen dalam Kurikulum Merdeka: Sebuah tinjauan analitis. Jurnal Akuntabilitas Manajemen Pendidikan, 12(1), 78-91.
Sufyadi, dkk. (2021). Asesmen pembelajaran pada Kurikulum Merdeka. Pusat Asesmen dan Pembelajaran, Kemendikbudristek.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. ASCD.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.