MODEL EVALUASI PENDIDIKAN BERBASIS CIPP PADA SEKOLAH DASAR UNGGULAN: KAJIAN KUALITATIF DI SD MUHAMMADIYAH PLUS SEMARANG

Authors

  • Indah Susi Irianti Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
  • Wahyu Haspri Nur Taryanti Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
  • Iim Fathimah Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
  • Suranto Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
  • Sumardi Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i02.55460

Keywords:

educational evaluation, CIPP model, educational quality

Abstract

This study evaluates the effectiveness of the educational system at SD Muhammadiyah Plus Semarang using the Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) framework. Positioned as a quality control instrument, this assessment responds to demands for continuous improvement in educational services. Employing a qualitative approach with a case study design, data were gathered through in-depth interviews, direct observation, and document analysis. Six key informants were involved: the principal, vice principal, classroom teachers, program coordinators, and school committee members. Data analysis followed the stages of condensation, presentation, and conclusion drawing, with source triangulation ensuring validity and reliability. The findings indicate that the context component exhibits high alignment between strategic programs, student needs, community expectations, and the institutional vision. In the input dimension, the school benefits from competent teaching staff, adequate infrastructure, and the successful integration of the Merdeka Curriculum with Muhammadiyah values. Structurally, process evaluation shows that instructional activities adopt student-centered approaches, supported by periodic academic supervision and consistent management of flagship programs. Meanwhile, the product dimension confirms an increase in academic and non-academic achievements, robust student character development, and high parental satisfaction. From a macro perspective, the study affirms that educational success is determined by reciprocal relationships between contextual appropriateness, resource maturity, implementation efficiency, and outcomes. Ultimately, this research reinforces the CIPP model as a viable instrument for assessing school quality and serves as a strategic reference for policymakers aiming to enhance basic education continuously.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akhadi, D. Y., & Shofwan, I. (2024). Evaluation of the CIPP model of the sewing training program. Journal of Nonformal Education, 10(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.15294/jone.v10i1.1723

Angelika, N., & Rusilowati, A. (2025). Evaluasi implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka dalam pembelajaran biologi melalui model CIPP. Jurnal Penelitian Evaluasi Pendidikan Indonesia, 15(1), 1–14.https://doi.org/10.23887/jpepi.v15i1.3664

Arifin, Z., Mulyono, H., & Sutarto, J. (2023). Evaluation of educational quality assurance programs using the CIPP model in Indonesian schools. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 17(3), 412–421. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v17i3.20874

Basaran, M., Dursun, B., Gur Dortok, H. D., & Yilmaz, G. (2021). Evaluation of preschool education program according to CIPP model. Pedagogical Research, 6(2), em0091. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/9701

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. Sage Publications.

Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2021). Purposive sampling: Complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 26(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2024). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Damayanti, E., Ibrahim, M. M., & Ismail, M. I. (2022). Evaluation of online learning programs at universities using the CIPP model. Educative: Journal of Educational Studies, 6(1), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.30983/educative.v6i1.4678

Handayani, T., Hidayat, R., & Suryana, A. (2024). School quality improvement through educational evaluation: Evidence from elementary schools implementing the Merdeka Curriculum. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 13(2), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v13i2.67412

Kasmaini, K., Syafryadin, S., Noermanzah, N., & Apriani, E. (2023). CIPP evaluation model: Online in-service teachers professional education program. ENGLISH FRANCA: Academic Journal of English Language and Education, 7(1), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.29240/ef.v7i1.5871

Kurniawan, D., Wibowo, A., & Prasetyo, A. (2023). Evaluating school-based management programs through the CIPP evaluation model. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 12(4), 1857–1866. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i4.24872

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2021). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211018141

Prayogo, D. (2022). CIPP evaluation model and its effect on e-learning. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i1.1071

Purwaningsih, H., & Dardjito, H. (2021). Implementation of CIPP model for online learning evaluation during COVID-19 pandemic. Getsempena English Education Journal, 8(2), 294–309. https://doi.org/10.46244/geej.v8i2.1394

Rahman, M. H., Abdullah, S., & Karim, N. A. (2022). Application of the CIPP model in evaluating educational programs: Implications for school improvement. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 1567–1579. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.3.1567

Suri, S., & Hariyati, N. (2024). CIPP evaluation model in educational evaluation: A literature study. Cahaya Pendidikan, 10(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.33373/chypend.v10i1.5950

Tampubolon, E. D., Panjaitan, S. M., & Simbolon, L. D. (2026). Evaluasi implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka dengan model CIPP (Context, Input, Process, and Product). Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(4), 2041–2053. https://doi.org/10.55583/jkip.v7i4.2351

Toosi, M., Modarres, M., Amini, M., & Geranmayeh, M. (2021). Context, input, process, and product evaluation model in medical education: A systematic review. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 10, 99. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1115_20

Yoshany, N., Naimi, M., Shiri, M., et al. (2025). Beyond traditional training: A comprehensive CIPP evaluation of internship programs. BMC Medical Education, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07404-3

Yuliana, E., Nurhayati, S., & Wahyuni, D. (2024). Educational program evaluation and stakeholder satisfaction in primary education institutions. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 28(1), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v28i1.71234

Zemzami, M., & Zbat, M. (2025). Evaluation of a preschool educational program using the CIPP evaluation model: A case study of the Éveil et Créativité collection within the FMPS network in Morocco. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 14(4), 120–137. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v14n4p120

Downloads

Published

2026-07-05