RESPONSIVITAS OMBUDSMAN JAWA TIMUR DALAM MENANGANI LAPORAN MALADMINISTRASI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i02.54635Keywords:
Public Service, Maladministration, Responsiveness, Ombudsman, East JavaAbstract
This study aims to describe and analyze the responsiveness of the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia, East Java Representative Office, in handling maladministration reports during the 2022–2024 period. The research employs a qualitative descriptive approach through in-depth interviews with the Head of Examination, PVL Staff, and Examination Assistants, supplemented by secondary data from annual institutional reports. The theoretical framework used is the responsiveness indicators by Zeithaml et al. in Hardiyansyah (2018), comprising six dimensions: attitude in responding to the public, service accuracy, service speed, service precision, service timeliness, and complaint-handling ability. The findings indicate that the Ombudsman RI East Java Representative Office has demonstrated a good-to-excellent level of responsiveness. The most notable achievements are in service speed and timeliness, evidenced by an average case resolution time of 98.02 days in 2024 (below the 114-day target) and a report closure rate of 370 reports, exceeding the 350-report target by 105.71%. The two-layer PVL-Riksa system produces high-quality monitoring products without any rejections from the reported agency during the research period. The main challenges identified are limited human resources relative to case volume and the uncooperativeness of reported institutions.
Downloads
References
Adiguna, R. C., Wijaya, K. A. S., & Wismayanti, K. W. D. (2024). Responsivitas Ombudsman Republik Indonesia (ORI) Perwakilan Provinsi Bali dalam kualitas pelayanan publik dari sudut pandang ketepatan waktu dan kecermatan pelayanan. Ethics and Law Journal: Business and Notary (ELJBN), 2(1).
Creswell, J. W. (2016). Research Design: Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Campuran. Pustaka Pelajar.
Dwiyanto, A. (2006). Mewujudkan Good Governance melalui Pelayanan Publik. Gadjah Mada University Press.
Dwiyanto, A. (2021). Manajemen Pelayanan Publik. Gadjah Mada University Press.
Hardiyansyah. (2018). Kualitas Pelayanan Publik: Konsep, Dimensi, Indikator, dan Implementasinya. Gava Media.
Latifah, M. (2021). Responsivitas Lembaga Ombudsman Republik Indonesia Perwakilan Provinsi Jawa Timur dalam menangani keluhan masyarakat. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 6(2).
Mawaddah, S., Fakhsiannor, & Malawat, S. H. (2025). Responsivitas Ombudsman RI Perwakilan Provinsi Kalimantan Selatan dalam menangani laporan maladministrasi. Jurnal Anterior, 24(2).
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. SAGE Publications, Inc.
Moleong, L. J. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Ombudsman RI. (2019). Laporan Tahunan Ombudsman Republik Indonesia.
Ombudsman RI. (2020). Peraturan Ombudsman RI Nomor 48 Tahun 2020 tentang Prosedur Penerimaan, Pemeriksaan, dan Penyelesaian Laporan.
Ombudsman RI Perwakilan Jawa Timur. (2025). Laporan Tahunan Ombudsman RI Perwakilan Jawa Timur Tahun 2024.
Pasolong, H. (2019). Teori Administrasi Publik. Alfabeta.
Sheren, A. O., & Ridwan, M. (2024). Responsivitas Ombudsman Republik Indonesia Perwakilan Provinsi Sumatera Utara dalam penanganan laporan masyarakat. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 20(1).
Sinambela, L. P. (2014). Reformasi Pelayanan Publik. Bumi Aksara.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Alfabeta.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 25 Tahun 2009 tentang Pelayanan Publik.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 37 Tahun 2008 tentang Ombudsman Republik Indonesia.
Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A., & Berry, L. L. (1990). Delivering Quality Service: Balancing Customer Perceptions and Expectations. Free Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.