KECENDERUNGAN PEMIKIRAN GURU MATEMATIKA DALAM PERSPEKTIF FORMALISME DAN INTUISIONALISME

Authors

  • Meiyta Citra Safitri Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto
  • Rosalina Nurul Bidayah Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto
  • Anggun Badu Kusuma Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i02.52164

Keywords:

Formalism, intuitionism, mathematics teachers, philosophy of mathematics, mathematics learning.

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the tendency of mathematics teachers’ thinking from the perspectives of formalism and intuitionism and their influence on the mathematics learning process. Formalism views mathematics as a formal system composed of symbols, axioms, definitions, and strict logical rules, whereas intuitionism views mathematics as a mental construction developed through intuition and individual experience. This study employed a qualitative method with a library research approach. Data were obtained from books, scientific journals, and previous studies related to the philosophy of mathematics and mathematics education. The results of the study indicate that most mathematics teachers still tend to apply a formalistic approach in teaching, characterized by teacher-centered learning, the use of standard procedures, emphasis on correct answers, and outcome-based evaluation. However, intuitionistic approaches have begun to develop through exploratory learning, problem-solving activities, and independent concept construction by students. The formalistic approach has advantages in developing logical and systematic thinking skills, but it may reduce students’ creativity and conceptual understanding. On the other hand, intuitionism can improve creativity, conceptual understanding, and students’ reasoning abilities, although it still requires formal validation to avoid misconceptions. In addition, curriculum demands, evaluation systems, teachers’ learning experiences, and pedagogical competence also influence teachers’ tendencies in mathematics teaching. Therefore, the integration of formalism and intuitionism is necessary to create balanced and meaningful mathematics learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agus Sukmana, Drs., M. S. (2011). Profil berpikir intuitif matematik.

Akbar, Jakub Saddam, Nurhidayah, Vibry Andina, Isma, Siti, Lubis, Sari, Sandy, William, Maulidiana, Sri, Setyaningrum, Vidya, Ningrum, Wulan Wahyu, Astuti, Nur Muji, & Ilyas, Fitri Susanti. (2023). MODEL & METODE PEMBELAJARAN INOVATIF.

Azmi, Memen Permata, & Salam, Azwir. (2023). Filsafat Intuisionisme dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. 05(02), 1674–1686.

Boaler, By Jo. (2019). Developing Mathematical Mindsets. 28–34.

Booth, Andrew, Sutton, Anthea, Clowes, Mark, & James, Marrissa Martyn St. (2022). SYSTEMATIC APPROACHES TO A SUCCESSFUL LITERATURE REVIEW.

Bruner, Jerome S. (1960). The Process of Education.

Bukhori, Ahmad. (2015). PENGEMBANGAN PERANGKA T PEMBELAJARAN MA TEMA TIKA DENGAN SCIENTIFIC APPROACH BERBASIS PROBLEM POSING PADA MA TERI PERBANDINGAN.

Cobb, Paul. (2014). Where Is the Mind? Constructivist and Sociocultural Perspectives on Mathematical Development. 23(7), 13–20.

Dhani, Muh. Ilham, Aziz, Tian Abdul, & Hakim, Lukman El. (2022). pembelajaran matematika melalui pendekatan konstruktivisme. 12.

Ernest. (2016). The Philosophy of Mathematics Education. 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40569-8

Hart, Chris. (1998). Doing a Literature Review.

Hersh, R. (2007). What is Mathematics Really? 1–7.

Irmayanti, Alwi, Ahmad, & Rahman, Abdul. (2026). TRANSFORMASI FORMALISME DARI PERMAINAN SIMBOL KE LITERASI MATEMATIKA SOSIOKULTURAL : A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW. 18, 58–69.

James B. Hunt, Jr, A.Rizzo, Judith, & D.White, April. (2009). the hunt institute’s blueprint for education leadership. (3).

Kartika, Yessi, & Yusnaini. (2021). UPAYA MENINGKATKAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA MELALUI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN DISCOVERY LEARNING DENGAN BERBANTUAN SOFTWARE GEOGEBRA PADA MATERI LIMIT FUNGSI ALJABAR DI KELAS XI MAN 2 BIREUEN. 3, 8–13.

Kilpatrick, Jeremy. (2001). helping children learn mathematics.

Maulyda, Mohammad Archi. (2020). Paradigma pembelajaran matematika berbasis nctm.

Miles, Matthew B., Huberman, A. Michael, & Saldaña, Johnny. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis.

Paldi, Jaya, & Jailani. (2019). Keterlaksanaan standar proses pada pembelajaran matematika menurut Kurikulum 2013 pada kelas XII SMA Negeri. 14(1), 80–91.

Rabikah, Syamsinar, Sartika, Aswiwi, Hatika, & Nirfayanti. (2025). SYSTEMATICS LITERATURE REVIEW : MENYELARASKAN INTUISI DAN LOGIKA DALAM PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA. 8, 858–866.

Romadhona, Ananda Regita, Ela, Arnis, Prameita, Dwi, Alvianita, Mahda, Ayu, Eka, Adha, Wulan, Dian, Jauhara, & Iffah, Nurul. (2023). Analisis teori belajar konstruktivisme dalam pembelajaran matematika di sma budi utomo perak. 11–21.

Sfard, Anna. (2008). Introduction to Thinking as Communication. 5, 429–436.

Skemp, Richard R. (1976). Relational Understanding and Instrumental Understanding. 20–26.

Snyder, Hannah. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology : An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104(August), 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Sutiarso, Sugeng. (2017). TEACHERS ’ BELIEF DALAM PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DAN FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHINYA. 10(2).

Downloads

Published

2026-06-16