PERSEPSI SISWA TERHADAP PEMBELAJARAN PAI BERBASIS BLENDED LEARNING PASCA PANDEMI DI SMA NEGERI 1 JUJUHAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v9i2.51961Keywords:
Blended learning; Islamic Religious Education; student perception; post-pandemic; religious education; senior high schoolAbstract
This study aims to map students’ perceptions of blended learning-based Islamic Religious Education (PAI) post-pandemic at SMA Negeri 1 Jujuhan and identify the factors most influential in accepting this model. An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was employed. The sample comprised 180 students selected through proportional stratified random sampling, supplemented by in-depth interviews with 12 students and 4 PAI teachers. The quantitative instrument was a 5-point Likert scale questionnaire measuring four dimensions: platform usability, pedagogical alignment, socio-emotional support, and assessment equity. Construct validity yielded r > 0.361 and reliability α = 0.89. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, multiple regression, ANOVA, and qualitative thematic analysis. Results indicated an overall moderate-high perception (M = 3.78; SD = 0.52). Multiple regression revealed that platform usability (β = 0.312; p < 0.01), pedagogical alignment (β = 0.287; p < 0.01), and socio-emotional support (β = 0.241; p < 0.05) significantly influenced positive perception, while assessment equity was non-significant (β = 0.118; p = 0.089). Perception differed across grade levels (F = 4.32; p = 0.015). Qualitative findings confirmed four main themes: flexibility vs. cognitive load, digital divide and parental support, integration of Islamic values in asynchronous design, and non-authentic assessment. The study recommends developing contextual blended PAI modules, strengthening teachers’ digital literacy, and implementing project-based collaborative assessments between home and school.
Downloads
References
Alwi, M., Fauzi, A., & Rahman, S. (2023). Student perception of blended learning in Islamic education: A mixed-methods study in rural Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Education Research, 8(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.21043/jier.v8i1.14567
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Graham, C. R. (2019). Theoretical foundations of blended learning. In The handbook of blended learning (pp. 3–21). Pfeiffer.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
Hidayat, R., & Nurfadilah, S. (2022). Blended learning dalam pendidikan agama Islam: Peluang, tantangan, dan strategi implementasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 11(2), 289–306. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v11i2.17890
Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Panduan pembelajaran dan asesmen Kurikulum Merdeka. Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan.
Kementerian Agama RI. (2023). Rencana strategis pendidikan agama Islam 2023–2027. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Islam.
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164412458319
Nurdin, S., & Kurniawan, D. (2020). Desain pembelajaran PAI berbasis blended learning: Perspektif pedagogis dan teknologi. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 29(2), 312–327. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v29i2.31245
OECD. (2022). Education at a glance 2022: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/eag-2022-en
Rahmawati, D., & Fauzi, A. (2021). Persepsi siswa terhadap pembelajaran daring mata pelajaran PAI di masa pandemi. Tarbawi: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 17(2), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.21009/tarbawi.v17i2.15678
Schunk, D. H. (2020). Learning theories: An educational perspective (8th ed.). Pearson.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
Sonia Yulia Friska, Estuhono, & Riska Kurnia Fitri. (2023). PENGEMBANGAN E-MODUL RESEARCH BASED LEARNING MENGGUNAKAN LECTORA INSPIRE APPLICATION PADA PEMBELAJARAN IPAS UNTUK MENDUKUNG MENDEKA BELAJAR SISWA SEKOLAH DASAR. Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang, 9(2), 6073 - 6077. https://doi.org/10.36989/didaktik.v9i2.1391
UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education. UNESCO Publishing. https://doi.org/10.54675/UNESCO.GEMR2023
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Zainap, Khamim, S., Adilla, U., Hidayah, N. N., Rivaldo, G., & Saputra, R. (2021). PAI Go Digital: Teacher Innovation in Enhancing Learning Motivation and Engagement among Junior Secondary Students at SMP Negeri 1 Limbur Lubuk Mengkuang. Edcomtech: Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan, 6(2), 322–332. https://doi.org/10.17977/um039v6i22021p322
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.