Dinamika Interaksi Mahasiswa PLP 2 dengan Peserta Didik dalam Proses Pembelajaran
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i02.50357Keywords:
interaction dynamics, PLP 2 students, learners, learning process, case studyAbstract
This study examines the patterns of interaction formed between PLP 2 (Field Teaching Strengthening Program 2) students and learners at Senior High School during the learning process. The research framework is grounded in a qualitative methodology with a case study design. Data collection was conducted through in-depth interviews, structured field observations, and document analysis over ten weeks of PLP 2 implementation at SMA Negeri 13 Bone, Soulth Sulawesi. Research participants included seven PLP 2 students, one cooperating teacher, one field supervisor lecturer, and twelve purposively selected students. Data analysis followed the Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña model through stages of condensation, presentation, and conclusion drawing. The findings revealed four dominant interaction patterns: (1) instructive interaction based on open-ended questions, (2) dialogic-reflective interaction in group discussions, (3) affective-supportive interaction forming a positive learning climate, and (4) constructive corrective interaction in providing feedback. The success of these interaction patterns was influenced by students' ability to read classroom situations, build emotional rapport, and manage micro-conflicts that occur naturally in the learning process. This study concludes that the quality of interaction between PLP 2 students and learners develops progressively as teaching experience grows and the intensity of mentoring from cooperating teachers increases.
Downloads
References
Alexander, R. (2020). A dialogic teaching companion. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351040143
Flanders, N. A. (1970). Analyzing teaching behavior. Addison-Wesley. https://doi.org/10.2307/3120901
Frei, F. X., & Morriss, A. (2020). Unleashed: The unapologetic leader's guide to empowering everyone around you. Harvard Business Review Press.
Furlong, J., & Maynard, T. (2021). Mentoring student teachers: The growth of professional knowledge. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003144847
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children's thinking: A sociocultural approach. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203946657
Menter, I., Hulme, M., Murray, J., & Dalmau, M. C. (2021). Teacher education and the reform agenda: Professionalism, identity, and quality. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429344596
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Nadiroh, U., & Hamid, A. (2022). Pola komunikasi guru dan siswa dalam pembelajaran daring di sekolah menengah atas. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 7(1), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v7i1.2201
Putri, H. E., & Mulyani, S. (2023). Kualitas interaksi mahasiswa PPG Prajabatan dengan peserta didik dalam praktik pengalaman lapangan. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 29(2), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.17977/um048v29i22023p112
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. SAGE Publications.
Surakhmad, I., & Dewi, R. (2021). Tantangan pedagogik mahasiswa PLP dalam menghadapi keberagaman karakter siswa di sekolah menengah. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 10(3), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpgsd.v10i3.34122
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wahyuni, S., & Anshori, Y. (2024). Pengembangan kompetensi calon guru melalui program magang kependidikan berbasis refleksi dialogis. Jurnal Kependidikan, 10(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v10i1.58923
Widiati, U., & Hayati, N. (2020). Pre-service teacher professional development in the Indonesian context: From Cambridge English Teaching Framework perspective. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(3), 714–722. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v9i3.23225
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.