Pemanfaatan Interactive Flat Panel (IFP) Sebagai Media Pedagogi Digital dalam Meningkatkan Gairah Belajar Siswa di Era Pendidikan 5.0

Authors

  • Ardiansa Universitas PGRI Kanjuruhan Malang
  • Engelbertus Kukuh Widijatmoko Universitas PGRI Kanjuruhan Malang
  • Didik Iswahyudi Universitas PGRI Kanjuruhan Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i02.49796

Keywords:

Keywords: Digital Pedagogy; Education 5.0; Interactive Flat Panel; Digital Learning Media; Learning Enthusiasm

Abstract

This study examines the use of the Interactive Flat Panel (IFP) as a digital pedagogical medium to enhance student learning enthusiasm in the Education 5.0 era. A descriptive qualitative approach was applied. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, and document analysis at one junior high school in Malang Regency, East Java. Participants were selected purposively, involving the principal, vice principal for curriculum, senior teachers, and students. Data analysis used the interactive model by Miles, Huberman, and Saldana (2014). Three main findings emerged. First, digital pedagogy has been implemented through IFP at the policy, curriculum, and classroom practice levels, though institutional system strengthening is still needed. Second, IFP serves effectively as an interactive learning medium, supported by strong teacher judgment, where teachers selectively integrate technology based on pedagogical needs. Third, IFP use consistently enhances student learning enthusiasm through three mechanisms: transforming learning experiences from passive to active, reducing participation anxiety, and building stronger emotional bonds with learning materials. This study confirms that IFP effectiveness as a pedagogical instrument is not determined by technological sophistication, but by the quality of pedagogical integration designed and managed by teachers

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad, S., Umirzakova, S., Mujtaba, G., Amin, M. S., & Whangbo, T. (2026). Technologies , and Future Directions. 113–120.

Ai, L., Hoon, T. S., Wang, Q., Nor, S., & Mohamad, A. (2026). The relationship between digital literacy , perceived usefulness , and learning satisfaction among medical students in blended learning : the mediating role of learning engagement.

Az, F., & Nurrohmah, Z. (2026). Penggunaan Teknologi Panel Datar Interaktif ( IFP ) sebagai Media untuk Memperkuat Interaksi Sosial dalam Pembelajaran di SMPN Ma ’ arif 1 Ponorogo. 3(2025). https://doi.org/10.71155/integratia.vXiX.X

Bergdahl, N., Bond, M., Sjöberg, J., Dougherty, M., & Oxley, E. (2024). Unpacking student engagement in higher education learning analytics : a systematic review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00493-y

Brosnan, M., & Hasso, T. (2025). The effect of using whiteboard animation in teaching introductory accounting concepts.

Dahal, N., Neupane, B. P., & Pant, B. P. (2019). Participant selection procedures in qualitative research : experiences and some points for consideration.

Donkoh, S., & Mensah, R. (2023). Member checking as a quality assurance strategy in qualitative research. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 11(2), 1-14.

Fang, X., & Mo, Q. (2026). Digital education and student well-being: evidence from PISA 2022. Educational Technology Research, 14(1), 22-39.

Gallego, M. D., Bagozzi, R., & Bueno, S. (2024). behavioral sciences Analyzing the Behavior Towards the Use of Interactive Digital Whiteboards for Educational Purposes : A Proposal Based on the Model of Goal-Directed Behavior and the Theory of Planned Behavior.

Hall, S., & Liebenberg, L. (2024). Qualitative Description as an Introductory Method to Qualitative Research for Master ’ s-Level Students and Research Trainees. 23, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241242264

Krieglstein, F., Beege, M., Rey, G. D., Ginns, P., Krell, M., & Schneider, S. (2022). A systematic meta-analytic review of studies investigating the effectiveness of interactive whiteboard technology for learning. Educational Research Review, 37, 100469.

Kühl, T., & Wohninsland, P. (2022). Learning with the interactive whiteboard in the classroom : Its impact on vocabulary acquisition , motivation and the. 10387–10404.

Luo, Z., Tan, X., He, M., & Wu, X. (2023). Heliyon The seewo interactive whiteboard ( IWB ) for ESL teaching : How useful it is ? 9(October 2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20424

Mantula, F., & Mpofu, A. C. (2024). Qualitative Research Approach in Higher Education : Application , Challenges and Opportunities. 5(1), 1–10.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

Wei, C., Su, J., Zhao, J., Ding, K., & Kong, F. (2024). behavioral sciences Strength Use and Well-Being at Work among Teachers : The Mediating Role of Basic Need Satisfaction.

Wulansari, I., & Rosadi, N. (2025). Interactive Digital Learning Media and Student Motivation : Evidence from Indonesian Junior High Schools. 02(July), 74–77.

Zhou, Y., Li, X., & Wijaya, T. T. (2022). Determinants of Behavioral Intention and Use of Interactive Whiteboard by K-12 Teachers in Remote and Rural Areas. 13(June), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.934423

Downloads

Published

2026-06-01