A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF INSTAGRAM CAPTIONS USING NORMAN FAIRCLOUGH FRAMEWORK

Authors

  • Riski Rahmadani STAIN Mandailing Natal, Sumatera Utara
  • Rini Azizah STAIN Mandailing Natal, Sumatera Utara
  • Elvi Mastawiyah STAIN Mandailing Natal, Sumatera Utara
  • Wulandari Lubis STAIN Mandailing Natal, Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i02.49527

Keywords:

Critical Discourse Analysis, Instagram captions, language, power, ideology, Norman Fairclough

Abstract

In the digital era, social media has become a central platform for communication and meaning-making. Instagram, as one of the most widely used platforms, allows users to express ideas not only through images but also through captions that carry implicit social meanings. This study aims to analyze Instagram captions using the Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) framework proposed by Norman Fairclough, focusing on the relationship between language, power, and ideology. This research employs a qualitative descriptive method. The data consist of selected Instagram captions taken from specific accounts, which are analyzed using Fairclough’s three-dimensional framework: text, discursive practice, and social practice. The analysis examines linguistic features, the process of production and consumption of the captions, and the broader social context influencing the discourse. The findings are expected to show that Instagram captions are not neutral but are shaped by and contribute to the construction of social realities, including the reinforcement or challenge of power relations and ideological perspectives. Furthermore, the study highlights how language in digital spaces plays a crucial role in influencing audience perception and social interaction. In conclusion, this research provides insights into how discourse on social media operates within a wider socio-cultural context. It also emphasizes the importance of critical awareness in interpreting digital texts, particularly in understanding how language can shape and reflect power and ideology in contemporary society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbas, N. F., Eidan, S. S., & Muslah, A. (2025). Critical discourse analysis of online platforms: An overview. International Journal of Social Sciences and English Literature, 9(8), 27–33. https://doi.org/10.55220/2576-683x.v9.551

Crystal, D. (2011). Internet linguistics: A student guide. Routledge.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.

Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Fairclough, N. (2003). Analyzing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge.

Gee, J. P. (2014). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (4th ed.). Routledge.

KhosraviNik, M. (2017). Social media critical discourse studies (SM-CDS). Critical Discourse Studies, 14(5), 582–596.

Machin, D., & Mayr, A. (2012). How to do critical discourse analysis: A multimodal introduction. Sage.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage.

Ngaji, F. M., Prasetyo, S. I., Alexandra, V. D., San, R. D., & Nata, Y. (2025). Digital discourse, public sentiment, and ideology: A critical discourse analysis of social media networks on demonstrations in Yogyakarta. Journal of Cultural Analysis and Social Change, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.64753/jcasc.v10i2.1884

Sari, E. D. P., Hamadi, H. H., Setiyadi, D. B. P., Kencana, N., & Effendi, D. E. (2024). Critical discourse analysis in digital media: Unveiling ideology and power in the technological era. Journal of the American Institute. https://doi.org/10.71364/es9z9c19

Tohari, A. (2024). Critical discourse analysis interpreting the feminism movement in Instagram social media. MEDIOVA: Journal of Islamic Media Studies, 4(1), 25–51. https://doi.org/10.32923/medio.v4i1.4254

Wodak, R. (2015). The politics of fear: What right-wing populist discourses mean. Sage.

Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2009). Methods of critical discourse analysis (2nd ed.). Sage.

Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2016). Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed.). Sage.

Zainuddin, & Karim. (2025). Language and gender on social media: A critical discourse analysis of TikTok comments. Journal of Applied Linguistic and Cultural Studies, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.65787/jalc.v3i1.555

Zappavigna, M. (2012). Discourse of Twitter and social media: How we use language to create affiliation on the web. Bloomsbury Academic.

Zappavigna, M. (2018). Searchable talk: The linguistic functions of hashtags. Bloomsbury Academic

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30