SOCIAL COMMERCE AND STUDENT DECISION-MAKING: A NARRATIVE LITERATURE REVIEW IN EDUCATIONAL CONTEXTS

Authors

  • Kenneth Sahetapy Universitas Klabat
  • Shapely Smart Ambalao Universitas Klabat

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i02.49164

Keywords:

social commerce, student decision-making, trust, e-WOM, digital behavior

Abstract

The rapid development of social commerce has significantly transformed how individuals, particularly students, make decisions in digital environments. This study aims to synthesize existing literature on social commerce and student decision-making within educational contexts. A narrative literature review approach was employed by analyzing 20 peer-reviewed articles published between 2010 and 2024, sourced from academic databases such as Scopus, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect. The selected studies were analyzed thematically to identify key determinants influencing decision-making processes. The findings reveal that trust is the most dominant factor shaping student decision-making, followed by social influence, electronic word-of-mouth (e-WOM), and platform characteristics. These factors interact within algorithm-driven digital environments, where user-generated content and social interactions significantly affect perception, evaluation, and behavioral intention. The study further highlights that students operate in hybrid digital ecosystems where social interaction, learning processes, and consumption behaviors intersect. As a result, decision-making is not solely an individual cognitive process but a socially mediated and technologically influenced phenomenon. This review contributes to the literature by integrating fragmented findings into a comprehensive framework that explains how social, technological, and behavioral factors collectively shape student decision-making in social commerce contexts. The study also emphasizes the importance of digital literacy and critical thinking skills in enabling students to navigate complex online environments effectively. Future research is recommended to explore algorithmic influence and cross-cultural variations in student behavior within social commerce ecosystems

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Erkan, I., & Evans, C. (2016). The influence of electronic word-of-mouth in social media on consumers’ purchase intentions: An extended approach to information adoption. Journal of Business Research, 69(1), 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.05.003

Filieri, R. (2015). What makes online reviews helpful? A diagnosticity-adoption framework. International Journal of Information Management, 35(1), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.10.006

Hajli, M. N. (2015). Social commerce constructs and consumer’s intention to buy. International Journal of Information Management, 35(2), 183–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.12.005

Hajli, M. N., Sims, J., Zadeh, A. H., & Richard, M.-O. (2017). A social commerce investigation of the role of trust in a social networking site on purchase intentions. Journal of Business Research, 71, 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.10.004

Huang, Z., & Benyoucef, M. (2013). From e-commerce to social commerce: A framework for social commerce design. Information Systems Frontiers, 15, 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-012-9334-6

Junco, R. (2012). The relationship between frequency of Facebook use, participation in Facebook activities, and student engagement. Computers & Education, 58(1), 162–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.004

Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003

Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54(3), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.005

Kim, A. J., & Ko, E. (2012). Do social media marketing activities enhance customer equity? Journal of Business Research, 65(10), 1480–1486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.014

Liang, T. P., Ho, Y. T., Li, Y. W., & Turban, E. (2012). What drives social commerce: The role of social support and relationship quality. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 16(2), 69–90. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEC1086-4415160204

Shanmugam, M., et al. (2020). Social and technological factors influencing social commerce adoption.

Smith, A., & Anderson, M. (2018). Youth and social media use. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org

Tess, P. A. (2013). The role of social media in higher education classes. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(5), A60–A68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.032

Wang, Y. (2012). Student online purchasing behavior.

Yadav, M. S., de Valck, K., Hennig-Thurau, T., Hoffman, D. L., & Spann, M. (2019). Social commerce: A research agenda for the future. Journal of Interactive Marketing / Journal of Retailing.

Zhang, K. Z. K., & Benyoucef, M. (2016). Consumer behavior in social commerce: A literature review. Decision Support Systems, 86, 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2016.04.001

Zhou, L., Zhang, P., & Zimmermann, H. D. (2013). Trust in online environments and e-commerce purchasing behavior. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-19