COGNITIVE PRESENCE DALAM PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS MOOCS: STUDI KOMPARATIF ANTARA DOSEN DAN MAHASISWA DI ICE INSTITUTE

Authors

  • Titi Chandrawati Universitas Terbuka
  • Fajar Arwadi Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Afriani Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Heni Safitri Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Nur Hikmah Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Laksmi Dewi Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i02.49079

Keywords:

cognitive presence, community of inquiry, ICE Institute, MOOCs, online learning, perception gap

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the level of cognitive presence among lecturers and students in MOOCs-based online learning at ICE Institute using the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework. The study employed a quantitative descriptive approach. The instrument was adapted from the CoI Survey and validated through expert judgment. The respondents consisted of 38 students and 10 lecturers who actively participated in courses at ICE Institute during the odd semester of 2024. The sampling technique used purposive sampling with the criterion that respondents had completed at least four weeks of lectures. Data were analyzed using descriptive percentage statistics and proportion difference tests. The results showed that 80% of lecturers were categorized as having a high level of cognitive presence, while only 50% of students reached a similar level. Furthermore, 47.3% of students were categorized at a moderate level and 2.7% at a low level. This 30% gap indicates differences in perception and cognitive capacity between lecturers and students. Lecturers were considered highly competent in designing learning activities based on critical reflection; however, students had not fully utilized these opportunities. The study recommends the need for pedagogical interventions such as cognitive scaffolding, collaborative project-based learning, and self-regulated learning training for MOOCs students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(6), 1020-1032.

Aragon, S., & Johnson, E. (2004). Factors influencing completion and non-completion of community college online courses. In EdMedia+ Innovate Learning (pp. 3498-3505). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

Arpaci, I., Karataş, K., & Baloğlu, M. (2020). The development and initial tests for the psychometric properties of the COVID-19 Phobia Scale (C19P-S). Personality and Individual Differences, 164, 110108.

Boonchai, C., & Thamwipat, K. (2020). The development of community of inquiry in Thai MOOCs. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(14), 156-171.

Castellanos-Reyes, D. (2020). 20 years of the community of inquiry framework: A bibliometric analysis. The Internet and Higher Education, 47, 100760.

Deng, R. (2021). Emotion regulation in online learning: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 33(3), 973-1000.

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105.

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1-2), 5-9.

Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157-172.

Garrison, D. R., & Akyol, Z. (2013). The community of inquiry theoretical framework. In Handbook of distance education (pp. 122-138). Routledge.

Hakim, A., & Nurhikmah, N. (2018). Kemampuan tenaga pendidik dalam memanfaatkan pembelajaran berbasis e-learning. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 2(1), 55-65.

Muzaini, M., Rahayuningsih, S., Nasrun, N., & Hasbi, M. (2021). Creativity in synchronous and asynchronous learning during the covid-19 pandemic: A case study. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(3), 1722-1735.

Pham, T. N., Nguyen, H. T., & Le, T. T. (2021). Cognitive presence in Vietnamese MOOCs: A community of inquiry perspective. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 45-60.

Skryabin, M. (2017, May). Types of dropout in adaptive open online courses. In European Conference on Massive Open Online Courses (pp. 273-279). Springer, Cham.

Universitas Terbuka. (2021). ICE Institute untuk Indonesia satu. Diakses dari https://www.ut.ac.id/berita/2021/10/ice-institute-untuk-indonesia-satu

Downloads

Published

2026-05-20