IMPLEMENTASI KEBIJAKAN PENILAIAN NASIONAL: TINJAUAN LITERATUR SISTEMATIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i02.48957Keywords:
assessment, policy, evaluation, governance, educationAbstract
This study aims to analyze development trends, thematic structures, and scientific collaboration patterns in the research on national assessment policy implementation through a systematic literature review approach. The primary focus of this research is to identify the dynamics of scientific publications, knowledge structures, and dominant actors in the development of national assessment policy research within a global context. The research method employs a bibliometric approach using VOSviewer and Biblioshiny software to analyze publication data that has undergone a screening process, resulting in 35 articles that met the inclusion criteria. The analysis was conducted across three main dimensions: Annual Scientific Production and Most Relevant Sources to examine publication trends, keyword co-occurrence analysis to map the thematic structure, and author and country collaboration analysis to understand knowledge production networks. The findings indicate that the study of national assessment policy implementation experiences fluctuating growth with a significant increase in the final period, dominated by themes such as PISA, OECD, and large-scale assessment. Furthermore, the study reveals an imbalance in author and country contributions, with developed nations remaining the dominant actors in knowledge production. In conclusion, this research underscores that the implementation of national assessment policies is evolving within a framework of global education governance, which is heavily influenced by the logic of standardization, educational datafication, and global knowledge structure inequalities.
Keywords: assessment, policy, evaluation, governance, education
Downloads
References
Amrein-Beardsley, A., Geiger, T., & Winn, K. (2022). U.S. states’ performance on NAEP mathematics and reading exams after the implementation of school letter grade accountability policies. Educational Measurement Journal.
Anderson, C. W., de los Santos, E. X., Bodbyl, S., Covitt, B. A., Edwards, K. D., Hancock, J. B., Lin, Q., Morrison Thomas, C., Penuel, W. R., & Welch, M. M. (2018). Designing educational systems to support enactment of the Next Generation Science Standards. Wiley Periodicals.
Au, W. (2016). Meritocracy 2.0: High-stakes testing and the future of education. Routledge.
Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228.
Braun, H., & Kanjee, A. (2011). Large-scale assessment and policy. Assessment in Education.
Braga, D. S., & Miranda, C. C. (2023). Invisible schools: Inequalities in the conditions of facilities and limits of public policy instruments. Ensaio.
Bundsgaard, J. (2019). DIF as a pedagogical tool: Analysis of item characteristics in ICILS. Educational Measurement Journal.
Candido, H. H. D. (2020). Datafication in schools: Enactments of quality assurance and evaluation policies in Brazil. Educational Policy Analysis Archives.
Cipriano, G., & Martins, S. C. (2024). Introducing technologies into national large-scale testing: Are we ready? Assessment Technology Journal.
Clark, A. K., & Karvonen, M. (2021). Instructionally embedded assessment: Theory of action for an innovative system. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice.
Copp, D. T. (2017). Policy incentives in Canadian large-scale assessment: How policy levers influence teacher decisions about instructional change. Journal of Public Administration.
Daus, S., & Braeken, J. (2018). The sensitivity of TIMSS country rankings in science achievement. Large-Scale Assessments in Education.
de Macedo, E. P. N. (2021). Philosophy in the National Curriculum Guidelines and ENEM: Temporal and conceptual gaps. Curriculum Studies Journal.
Doz, D. (2019). The national assessment of mathematics in high schools in Italy with Slovene as the language of instruction. University of Maribor Press.
Ehmke, T., van den Ham, A. K., Sälzer, C., Heine, J., & Prenzel, M. (2020). Measuring mathematics competence in international and national large-scale assessments. Springer.
Ferrão, M. E., Prata, P., & Alves, M. T. G. (2020). Multiple imputation in big identifiable data for educational research. Educational Measurement Review.
Freddano, M., & Pandolfini, V. (2022). Teacher training on data literacy for school evaluation and improvement. International Journal of Teacher Education.
Gillis, S., Polesel, J., & Wu, M. (2016). PISA data: Raising concerns with its use in policy settings.
Australian Association for Research in Education.
Guerres-Zucco, D., Zanella, A., Coutinho, A. S., & Botelho Néia, J. A. (2022). Evaluation instruments and quality parameters for early childhood education. Fundação Carlos Chagas.
Hidayah, I. R., Sa’dijah, C., Anwar, L., Yerizon, & Arnawa, I. M. (2025). Empowering students’ numeracy skills: Mathematics teachers’ perceptions. Curriculum and Instruction Studies.
Hilbert, S., Coors, S., Kraus, E., et al. (2021). Machine learning for the educational sciences. Review of Education.
Imlig, F., & Ender, S. (2018). Towards a national assessment policy in Switzerland: Areas of conflict.
Informa UK Limited.
Kanjee, A., & Moloi, Q. (2016). A standards-based approach for reporting assessment results in South Africa. South African Journal of Education.
Kauko, J., Centeno, V. G., Candido, H., Shiroma, E., & Klutas, A. (2016). The emergence of quality assessment in Brazilian basic education. Educational Policy Studies.
Landahl, J. (2020). The PISA calendar: Temporal governance and international large-scale assessments.
Informa UK Limited.
Li, J., & Xue, E. (2022). Pursuing sustainable higher education admission policy reform in China.
Education Policy Journal.
Lunde, I. M., & Piattoeva, N. (2025). The mundane governance of education through time: National testing in Norway. Education Policy Studies.
Martens, K., Niemann, D., & Teltemann, J. (2016). Effects of international assessments in education.
Globalisation, Societies and Education.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology.
Milner, A. L. (2025). Confronting the disadvantage gap: High-stakes assessment systems. Educational Leadership Journal.
Niemann, D., Martens, K., & Teltemann, J. (2017). PISA and its consequences: Shaping education policies. Journal of Education Policy.
Nortvedt, G. A. (2018). Policy impact of PISA on mathematics education in Norway. International Journal of Educational Studies.
OECD. (2013). Synergies for better learning: An international perspective on evaluation and assessment. OECD Publishing.
Oliveira, D. A., Junior, E. A. P., & Neto, J. L. H. (2025). Quality of basic education: Beyond large-scale cognitive tests. Educational Evaluation Journal.
Page, M. J., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement. BMJ.
Sandoval-Hernández, A., Carrasco, D., & Eryilmaz, N. (2025). A critical evaluation of alignment optimization. Studies in Educational Evaluation.
Savage, G. C., & de Carvalho, D. (2025). Hybridity as a governmental technique for designing and delivering NAPLAN. Australian Journal of Public Administration.
Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2014). The OECD and global governance in education. Globalisation, Societies and Education.
Selwyn, N. (2015). Education and technology. Bloomsbury.
Shore, C., & Wright, S. (2015). Governing by numbers: Audit culture and accountability. Social Anthropology.
Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2025). Learning from elsewhere: Policy borrowing in education. Comparative Education Review.
Thomas, D. P. (2020). Rapid decline and gender disparities in NAPLAN writing data. Australian Educational Researcher.
Vitelli, R. F., Fritsch, R., & Corsetti, B. (2018). Educational indicators in basic education assessment. ANPEd.
Williamson, B. (2017). Big data in education. SAGE.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
