PERSEPSI SISWA TERHADAP MATERI DAN METODE PEMBELAJARAN MENYIMAK

Authors

  • Farida Nugrahani Universitas Veteran Bangun Nusantara
  • Ika Setyaningrum Universitas Veteran Bangun Nusantara
  • Tiyas Aning Susanti Universitas Veteran Bangun Nusantara
  • Sumarti Universitas Veteran Bangun Nusantara
  • Lastri Hidayati Universitas Veteran Bangun Nusantara
  • Maria Chrismawati Kartikasari Universitas Veteran Bangun Nusantara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i02.48850

Keywords:

perception, material, method, listening learning

Abstract

This study aims to explore students' perceptions of the integration of materials and methods in listening instruction. This study is a descriptive qualitative study. The subjects were 30 high school students at State Elementary School 1 Lumbungkerep, Klaten, who were selected purposively. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, member checking, and field notes, then analyzed using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña. The results revealed two main themes: first, in the material dimension, students complained about high speaking speed, difficult to recognize foreign vocabulary, unfamiliar accents, and long recording durations that were tiring, but they really liked video- or image-based materials and stories that were relevant to their daily lives. Second, in the method dimension, students positively assessed the provision of apperception and key vocabulary, selective note-taking of important points, pauses during recordings, and discussions with peers. These methods were perceived to reduce anxiety, increase focus, and build self-confidence. In conclusion, student perceptions reflect cognitive and affective dynamics that require conscious management of the pace of material presentation, bridging vocabulary and accent gaps, integrating visual supports, and designing activities that accommodate metacognitive stages and collaborative discussions. The implication is that educators need to develop listening instructional designs that are more responsive to students' authentic experiences.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arifin, M. N. (2024). Evolving Perspectives: A Comprehensive Guide to TEFL Methodology.

Chu, L., Arumugam, N., & Huang, Z. (2024). Implementing the Metacognitive Pedagogical Cycle: Effects on Listening Performance and Learners’ Perceptions. International Journal of Religion, 5(11), 2474–2483. https://doi.org/10.61707/mqepva9

Cinelli, M. D., & LeBoeuf, R. A. (2020). Keeping It Real: How Perceived Brand Authenticity Affects Product Perceptions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 30(1), 40–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1123

Episiasi, E., Wahidin, W., Suramto, S., & Kencana, N. (2025). Students’ Perception on the Use of Note-taking Strategy in Listening. JURNAL PERSPEKTIF PENDIDIKAN, 19(1), 96–105. https://doi.org/10.31540/jpp.v19i1.3478

Fiani, A., Suherdi, D., & Musthofa, B. (2019). The Impact of Metacognitive Instruction on EFL Students’ Listening Comprehension and Metacognitive Awareness in Lubuk Linggau. Proceedings of the UNNES International Conference on English Language Teaching, Literature, and Translation (ELTLT 2018). Proceedings of the UNNES International Conference on English Language Teaching, Literature, and Translation (ELTLT 2018). https://doi.org/10.2991/eltlt-18.2019.28

Flynn, S., & Lust, B. (1990). In Defense of Parameter‐Setting in L2 Acquisition: A Reply to Bley‐Vroman and Chaudron‘90*. Language Learning, 40(3), 419–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1990.tb00670.x

Gullberg, K., Johansson, V., & Johansson, R. (2024). In Scriptura Veritas? Exploring Measures for Identifying Increased Cognitive Load in Speaking and Writing. Languages, 9(3), 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages9030085

Hatami, S. (2017). The differential impact of reading and listening on L2 incidental acquisition of different dimensions of word knowledge. 29(1).

Irgin, P. (2025). Note-taking in Academic Listening: A Translanguaging Perspective. RELC Journal, 00336882251322253. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882251322253

Lee, J. J., & Mccabe, J. M. (2021). Who Speaks and Who Listens: Revisiting the Chilly Climate in College Classrooms. Gender & Society, 35(1), 32–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243220977141

Madarbakus, N. (2021). Using metacognitive strategy instruction in a TED Talks-based L2 listening programme [Open Access Te Herenga Waka-Victoria University of Wellington]. https://doi.org/10.26686/wgtn.15020043

Maharani, R. A. (2023). Indonesian Efl Postgraduate Students’ Perception Toward Accent in Listening Comprehension. Premise: Journal of English Education, 12(2), 559. https://doi.org/10.24127/pj.v12i2.6978

Mahat-Shamir, M., Neimeyer, R. A., & Pitcho-Prelorentzos, S. (2021). Designing in-depth semi-structured interviews for revealing meaning reconstruction after loss. Death Studies, 45(2), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2019.1617388

Mansouri, K. (2020). Research into practice: Implementing strategy and metacognition-based instruction in the teaching of EFL listening for Algerian university teachers and students. https://doi.org/10.48683/1926.00095650

Marqueta Gracia, B., & Rubio Orecilla, F. J. (2023). Las alternancias asistemáticas de número y género en los compuestos españoles: Una frontera incierta entre morfología y sintaxis. Sintagma. Revista de Lingüística, (35), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.21001/sintagma.2023.35.03

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publication.

Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi Revisi). . ISBN: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nuralisa, N., Qalyubi, I., & Ali Mirza, A. (2025). Real Voices, Real Learning: Students’ Perceptions of Authentic Listening Materials. Journal of English Language and Education, 10(2), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v10i2.703

Patni, D. G. (2022). Listening as an Important Tool in Language Acquisition While Teaching. 04(05).

Razghandi, K., & Yaghmaei, E. (2020). Rethinking Filter: An Interdisciplinary Inquiry into Typology and Concept of Filter, Towards an Active Filter Model. Sustainability, 12(18), 7284. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187284

Rezai, A., Ashkani, P., & Ismail, S. M. (2023). Effects of Group-Dynamic Assessment and Process-Based Instruction on EFL Learners’ Metacognitive Awareness and Listening Comprehension: A Mixed-Methods Inquiry. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 52(5), 1345–1370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-023-09934-7

Rost, M. (2014). Listening in a Multilingual World: The Challenges of Second Language (L2) Listening. International Journal of Listening, 28(3), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2014.937895

Rost, M. (2016). Teaching and researching listening (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Shin, S., & Lee, S. (2024). Effects of the Type of Audio‐visual Input and Listenability on Young L2 Learners’ Listening Comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 58(4), 1580–1608. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3298

Shokirovna, T. L. (2023). COGNITIVE PROCESSES: PERCEPTION AND SENSATION. Interdisciplinary Research., 12(03).

Siegel, J. (2022). Research into practice: Teaching notetaking to L2 students. Language Teaching, 55(2), 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000476

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Van Hedger, S. C., & Johnsrude, I. S. (2022). Speech Perception Under Adverse Listening Conditions. In L. L. Holt, J. E. Peelle, A. B. Coffin, A. N. Popper, & R. R. Fay (Eds.), Speech Perception (Vol. 74, pp. 141–171). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81542-4_6

Van, L. J. (2000). The effects of inserted pauses on listening comprehension (Tesis master, University of Victoria). UVic Space. http://hdl.handle.net/1828/1234

Vandergrift, L., & Cross, J. (2018). Individual Listener Variables. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching (1st ed., pp. 1–6). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0586

Vandergrift, V., & Goh, C. C. M. (2012). Teaching and learning second language listening: Metacognition in action. Routledge.

Wa-Mbaleka, S. (2020). The Researcher as an Instrument. In A. P. Costa, L. P. Reis, & A. Moreira (Eds.), Computer Supported Qualitative Research (Vol. 1068, pp. 33–41). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31787-4_3

Wu, L., & Bakar, K. A. (2025). Language Scaffolding Strategies Based on Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development in Early Reading Education: A Cross-Cultural Comparison. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(6). https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i6.9624

Wulandari, N. W. R., & Jahiu, E. (2025). Enhancing English proficiency enjoyably: Improving language skills through watching engaging and educational English movies. Journal of Language and Pragmatics Studies, 4(3), 194–206. https://doi.org/10.58881/jlps.v4i3.79

Downloads

Published

2026-05-26