ANALISIS ETIKA PROFESI GURU PAUD DALAM MENDUKUNG PERKEMBANGAN NILAI AGAMA, MORAL, DAN SOSIAL EMOSIONAL ANAK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i02.47982Keywords:
Teacher ethics, love-based curriculum, early childhood educationAbstract
This study aims to analyze the role of teacher professional ethics in implementing a love-based curriculum to support the development of religious, moral, and socioemotional values in early childhood. This research uses a qualitative approach with a literature study method by reviewing various relevant scientific sources such as journals, books, and proceedings. The results show that a love-based curriculum emphasizes affection, empathy, and positive relationships between teachers and children, which significantly contribute to children's character development. Teacher professional ethics, including responsibility, fairness, and exemplary behavior, plays a crucial role in creating a supportive learning environment. Furthermore, the integration of a love-based curriculum effectively enhances children's moral awareness and socio-emotional skills. Therefore, the synergy between teacher ethics and a love-based curriculum is essential in achieving holistic early childhood education.
Downloads
References
Aini, F., & Ramadhan, Z. H. (2024). Peran guru dalam mengembangkan nilai etika dan moral peserta didik sekolah dasar. ELSE (Elementary School Education Journal): Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Sekolah Dasar, 8(2).
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall.
Berkowitz, M. W., & Bier, M. C. (2014). Research-based character education. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591(1), 72–85.
Bredekamp, S., & Copple, C. (2020). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs (4th ed.). National Association for the Education of Young Children.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
Denham, S. A. (2006). Socialemotional competence as support for school readiness. Early Education and
Development, 17(1), 57–89.
Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, TL, & Morris, AS (2013). Perkembangan prososial.
Epstein, J. L. (2002). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools. ADOLESCENCE-SANDIEGO-, 37, 435-435.
Follari, L. (2019). Landasan dan praktik terbaik dalam pendidikan anak usia dini . Pearson. One Lake Street, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458.
Goleman, D. (2005). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. Bantam.
Hidayati, N., & Kurniawan, A. (2021). Implementasi pendidikan karakter pada anak usia dini. Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 5(2), 123–135.
Hornby, G., & Lafaele, R. (2023). Barriers to parental involvement in education: An explanatory model. In Mapping the field (pp. 121-136).
Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2009). The prosocial classroom: Teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student and classroom outcomes. Review of educational research, 79(1), 491-525.
Lickona, T. (2012). Educating for character: How our schools can teach respect and responsibility. Bantam Books. Lincoln, Y. (1980). Guba. E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage. LincolnNaturalistic Inquiry1985.
Mutiah, D. (2015). Psikologi bermain anak usia dini. Kencana.
Noddings, N. (2013). Caring: A relational approach to ethics and moral education (2nd ed.).
University of California Press.
Siegel, D. J., & Bryson, T. P. (2014).
No-drama discipline: The whole-brain way to calm the chaos and nurture your child's developing mind. Bantam.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of business research, 104, 333-339.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
