ANALISIS PEMAHAMAN MAHASISWA MATEMATIKA TERHADAP KONSEP DASAR GEOMETRI EUCLID DITINJAU DARI UNSUR DASAR, AKSIOMA, POSTULAT, DAN PROPOSISI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i02.47758Keywords:
axioms, basic elements, conceptual understanding, Euclidean geometry, postulates, propositionsAbstract
This study aims to analyze mathematics education students’ understanding of the basic concepts of Euclidean geometry in terms of its basic elements, axioms, postulates, and propositions. A descriptive quantitative approach was used with 42 students from the University of Medan who had taken the Euclidean Geometry course as subjects. The instrument consisted of a 10-item multiple-choice test measuring six indicators. The data were analyzed descriptively. The results showed an average score of 84.76 (Very Good category). Fifty percent of the students fell into the Very Good category and 50% into the Good category; no students were in the Fair, Poor, or Very Poor categories. The score distribution was not normal (Shapiro-Wilk p<0.05) with a sample standard deviation of 11.31. Preliminary analysis of the indicators revealed very good understanding of basic elements, postulates, and simple proofs, but weak performance in the application of concepts (only 39.13% correct) and the concept of axiomatic independence (52.17% correct). Although the overall results appear high, weaknesses in applied reasoning and axiomatic structure still need to be addressed. The study recommends strengthening the teaching of deductive reasoning and providing practice in applying theorems in non-routine contextsDownloads
References
Artikel jurnal:
Amalia, R. (2024). Analisis kesalahan mahasiswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah segiempat pada mata kuliah geometri. EDU-MAT: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.20527/edumat.v11i2.16113
Arifin, S. A. N. (2021). Analisis jawaban mahasiswa dalam menyelesaikan soal pembuktian geometri berdasarkan teori Newman. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(4), 1395–1408. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v3i4.564
Asmaun. (2025). Analisis tingkat berpikir geometri mahasiswa dalam pemecahan masalah berdasarkan teori Van Hiele pada mata kuliah geometri dasar. Venn: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika. https://doi.org/10.53696/venn.v4i3.353
Asyhar, B. (2015). Studi pemahaman bukti dan pembuktian dalam Geometri Euclid mahasiswa Jurusan Tadris Matematika IAIN Tulungagung. JPM: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.33474/jpm.v1i2.720
Dewi, E. A., & Sari, R. M. M. (2025). Analisis konseptual dan historis Geometri Euclid dalam Elemens: Relevansi dan pengaruhnya pada matematika modern. Radian Journal: Research and Review in Mathematics Education, 4(2), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.35706/radian.v4i2
Lutfiana, F., & Handayani, U. F. (2025). Kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis siswa pada materi perbandingan trigonometri. CONSISTAN (Jurnal Tadris Matematika), 3(1), 106–118. https://doi.org/10.35897/consistan.v3i01.1415
Meidianti, A., Kholifah, N., & Sari, N. I. (2022). Kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis peserta didik dalam pembelajaran matematika. Himpunan: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 134–144. https://jim.unindra.ac.id/index.php/himpunan/article/view/6818
Snae, L. M. Y., Abi, A. M., & Babys, U. (2024). Deskripsi kemampuan analisis mahasiswa menyelesaikan soal Geometri Euclid berdasarkan teori Van Hiele. ANARGYA: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), 139–145. https://doi.org/10.24176/anargya.v7i2.13543
Susilawati, S., Rahmatullah, R., & Putra, M. (2023). Peranan matematika dalam kehidupan sehari-hari. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 1–10. https://repository.bbg.ac.id/bitstream/1504/1/F0517025W.pdf
Unniza, S., Andriani, P., Afifurrahman, A., & Wicaksono, B. (2024). Analisis kesulitan mahasiswa dalam memahami konsep geometri bidang datar. Jurnal Pemikiran dan Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika (JP3M), 7(1), 62–71. https://doi.org/10.36765/jp3m.v7i1.729
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.