Analisis Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematika Pada Materi Perkalian Siswa Kelas IV SD
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i02.47641Keywords:
conceptual understanding, mathematics learning, multiplication, quantitative descriptiveAbstract
This study is motivated by the low and uneven distribution of elementary students’ mathematical conceptual understanding, particularly in multiplication, which is often learned procedurally without deep conceptual meaning. This study aims to analyze the level of students’ mathematical conceptual understanding in multiplication among fourth-grade elementary school students. The research employed a quantitative descriptive approach involving 20 students of SDN 3 Sukahaji. Data were collected through a mathematical conceptual understanding test developed based on key conceptual understanding indicators, while data analysis was conducted using descriptive statistics, including mean, median, mode, as well as the highest and lowest scores. The results revealed that the average student score was 77, which falls into the medium category, with the highest score of 92 and the lowest score of 60, indicating variability in students’ abilities. Based on the categorization results, most students were classified into the medium category, followed by high and low categories, suggesting that students’ conceptual understanding is not yet evenly distributed. These findings imply the need for improvements in the learning process through the implementation of student-centered learning strategies and the use of contextual and varied instructional media to enhance students’ conceptual understanding more effectively
Downloads
References
Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a Theory of Instruction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Hudojo, H. (2005). Pengembangan Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran Matematika. Malang: UM Press.
Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding It Up: Helping Children Learn Mathematics. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
Nasution, S. (2003). Metode Penelitian Naturalistik Kualitatif. Bandung: Tarsito.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
Piaget, J. (1970). Science of Education and the Psychology of the Child. New York: Viking Press.
Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational Understanding and Instrumental Understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20–26.
Slavin, R. E. (2005). Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice. Boston: AllyBacon
Sumarmo, U. (2014). Berpikir dan Disposisi Matematik: Apa, Mengapa, dan Bagaimana Dikembangkan pada Peserta Didik. Bandung: FMIPA UPI.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Piaget, J. (1970). Science of Education and the Psychology of the Child. New York: Viking Press.
Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational Understanding and Instrumental Understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20–26.
Slavin, R. E. (2005). Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Hiebert, J., & Carpenter, T. P. (1992). Learning and Teaching with Understanding. Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 65–97.
Ruseffendi, E. T. (2006). Pengantar kepada Membantu Guru Mengembangkan Kompetensinya dalam Pengajaran Matematika. Bandung: Tarsito.
Sanjaya, W. (2008). Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana.
Uno, H. B. (2011). Model Pembelajaran: Menciptakan Proses Belajar Mengajar yang Kreatif dan Efektif. Jakarta: Bumi Aksar
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.