Evaluasi Kekesatan Runway Menggunakan MuMeter Run Report (Studi Kasus : Bandar Udara Budiarto – Curug)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i02.47373Keywords:
Flexible pavement, Pavement Evaluation, Pavement Condition Index (PCI), MuMeter, Roughness, Runway Pavement RepairAbstract
Budiarto Airport has a runway, taxiway, and apron with flexible pavement and a PCN of 37 F/C/X/T. Flexible pavement is elastic, in this case asphalt, while rigid pavement uses concrete and is more rigid. With the increase in aircraft movements, an evaluation of the runway pavement condition using the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) is necessary to determine the condition of the pavement surface. PCI is a visual test that assists in the maintenance and repair of pavements when necessary. The results of the PCI survey of Runway 12-30 at Budiarto Airport were 99.10, which is classified as “good,” indicating that the runway pavement surface is still in good functional condition. This is one of the safety factors in aviation, namely the condition of the runway. The more aircraft that operate, the more rubber deposits accumulate on the runway. This causes the runway to become slippery, which can cause aircraft to skid because the brakes cannot work effectively. To avoid the risk of accidents, regular checks of runway skid resistance are necessary. There are several methods that can be used to check the condition of runway friction, one of which is using a MuMeter device. Based on the tests that have been carried out and based on Government Decree No. 94 of 2015 in classifying the damage and roughness experienced on the runway at Budiarto Airport, recommendations for handling the Budiarto runway can be obtained, namely “Major Rehabilitation (overlay or similar methods)”.
Downloads
References
Anderson, M. J., & Thomas, R. A. (2013). A comparative study of MuMeter and friction tester data for runway friction evaluation. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 139(5), 549-557.
Asi, Ibrahim M. 2007. “Evaluating Skid resistance of Different Asphalt Concrete Mixes.” Building and Environment 42(1): 325–29.
Brown, L. R., & Jones, P. H. (2014). MuMeter-based assessment of runway friction and its impact on aircraft braking performance. Journal of Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 31, 47-59.
Bennett, Christopher R, Hernán De Solminihac, and Alondra Chamorro. 2006. “Data Collection Technologies for Road Management.” The World Bank, Washington, DC (February): 1–8. www.road-management.info.
Evans, H. L., & Turner, W. R. (2011). Assessment of runway friction using MuMeter and related safety implications. Transportation Research Record, 2256(1), 73-82.
FAA. 1997. “Ac 150/5320-12C.” Techniques. Fusion, Multi-sensor Information. 2020. “Estimation for Runway Friction Coe Ffi Cient Based On.”
Kim, Sungjin et al. 2019. “UAS-Based Airport Maintenance Inspections: Lessons Learned from Pilot Study Implementation.” Computing in Civil Engineering 2019: Smart Cities, Sustainability, and Resilience
- Selected Papers from the ASCE International Conference on Computing in Civil Engineering 2019 (June): 382–89.
Martin, G. R., & Smith, K. L. (2015). Runway friction evaluation using a continuous friction measuring device (CFMD) and MuMeter. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 141(2), 04014083.
Harris, J. D., & Roberts, P. M. (2010). MuMeter-based assessment of runway friction and its relationship with aircraft braking action reports. Journal of Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 18(2), 312-322.
Liu, Xiaolan, Chuanwei Fu, and Shunqun Li. 2022. “Temperature and Settlement Characteristics of Graded Crushed-Rock Layer for Runway Engineering in Permafrost Regions.” PLoS ONE 17(10 October): 1–25.http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.027 4843.
Los, Unidad Metodología D E Conocimiento D E. “A DEEP NEURAL NETWORKS APPROACH FOR PIXEL-LEVEL RUNWAY PAVEMENT CRACK SEGMENTATION USING DRONE- CAPTURED IMAGES” 3.
Johnson, M. S., & Anderson, P. L. (2018). MuMeter measurements for assessing runway safety and maintenance. Transportation Research Record, 2625(1), 48-57.
Organization, International Civil Aviation. 2006. “Aerodrome Design Manual.” Poerwanto, Eko, and Uyuunul Mauidzoh. 2017. “Analisis Kecelakaan Penerbangan Di Indonesia Untuk Peningkatan Keselamatan Penerbangan.” Angkasa: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Teknologi 8(2): 9.
Indrawati. 2018. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif (Manajemen dan Bisnis Konvergensi Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi). PT Refika Aditama, Bandung.
Kurniawan. 2019. Metode Riset Bisnis. Bandung: CV Alfabeta.
Miro, Fidel. 2012. Pengantar Sistem Transportasi. PT Erlangga, Jakarta.
Palino, Silvani Desy, & Susilo, Budi Hartanto. 2021. Analisis Tebal Perkerasan Dan Biaya Dengan Software Faarfield Pada Landas Pacu BIJB Kertajati. Jurnal Teknik Sipil 17(1):14–29. doi: 10.28932/jts.v17i1.2382.
Pradnyandari, Tri Satya, and Ni Ketut Purnawati. 2015. Peran Maintenance Dalam Memoderasi Pengaruh Scheduling Terhadap Kinerja Maskapai Penerbangan. Jurnal Transportasi 15(2):143–50.
Rahimudin. 2015. “Analisis Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Kecelakaan Pesawat Udara Komersil Di Indonesia Pada Tahun 2002 Sampai Dengan Tahun 2012.” Jurnal Manajemen Dirgantara 8: 82–83. https://jurnal.sttkd.ac.id/index.php/jmd/iss ue/view/13.
Smith, J. A., & Brown, R. T. (2020). Runway friction evaluation using a MuMeter: A review of methods and findings. Journal of Airport Engineering, 26(4), 350-361.
Williams, D. L., & Clark, E. R. (2017). Evaluating runway friction conditions with a MuMeter: Case studies from multiple airports. Transportation Research Record, 2602(1), 25-34.
White, A. B., & Taylor, S. P. (2016). MuMeter-based assessment of runway friction and its implications for aircraft operations. Journal of Aircraft, 53(2), 467-478.
White, Greg, and Bruce Rodway. 2014. “Distress and Maintenance of Grooved Runway Surfaces.” Conference: Airfield Engineering and Maintenance Summit (July). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 279450519.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
