HUBUNGAN PENGGUNAAN CHATGPT DENGAN LITERASI DIGITAL MAHASISWA TEKNOLOGI PENDIDIKAN UNIVERSITAS NEGERI PADANG
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i02.47121Keywords:
ChatGPT usage; digital literacy; DigComp 2.1; Spearman Rank correlation; Educational Technology.Abstract
This study investigates the relationship between ChatGPT usage and digital literacy among students of the Educational Technology Study Program at Universitas Negeri Padang (UNP). Preliminary observations found that 97% of students actively use AI tools predominantly ChatGPT yet critical evaluation of AI-generated content remains limited. A quantitative correlational design was employed with a population of 611 active students (cohorts 2020–2025); 242 respondents were selected via proportional random sampling (Slovin’s formula, 5% error margin). ChatGPT usage was measured across three indicators (Use Skill, Critical Understanding, Communicative Ability) and digital literacy across eight DigComp 2.1 dimensions. Data were analysed using Microsoft Excel 2019 and SPSS 27; non-normality (Kolmogorov Smirnov: Asymp. Sig. = 0.006 < 0.05) warranted Spearman Rank correlation. Results show ChatGPT usage at a moderate level (mean = 49.20 of 60; 69.0%) and digital literacy similarly moderate (mean = 67.00 of 80; 70.7%). The Spearman coefficient (rs = 0.750; p < 0.001) confirms a strong, significant positive relationship between the two variables.
Downloads
References
Azwar, S. (2009). Reliabilitas dan validitas (Edisi ke-3). Pustaka Pelajar.
Baidoo-Anu, D., & Ansah, L. O. (2023). Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Journal of AI, 7(1), 52–62.
Belshaw, D. (2011). What is "digital literacy"? A pragmatic investigation [Doctoral dissertation, Durham University]. https://etheses.dur.ac.uk/3446/
Dwihadiah, D., Gerungan, A., & Purba, H. (2024). Penggunaan ChatGPT di kalangan mahasiswa dan dosen perguruan tinggi Indonesia. CoverAge: Journal of Strategic Communication, 14(2), 130–145.
European Commission. (2018). DigComp 2.1: The digital competence framework for citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/38842
Fukuyama, M. (2018). Society 5.0: Aiming for a new human-centered society. Japan Spotlight, 27(5), 47–50.
Gilster, P. (1997). Digital literacy. Wiley.
Ibrahim, H., Liu, F., Asim, R., Battu, B., Benkirane, S., Alhafni, B., & Bosselut, A. (2023). Generative AI and the future of higher education: A threat to academic integrity or a promising learning tool? arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.13628
Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Lim, W. M., Gunasekara, A., Pallant, J. L., Pallant, J. I., & Pechenkina, E. (2023). Generative AI and the future of education: Ragnarök or reformation? A paradoxical perspective from management educators. International Journal of Management Education, 21(2), 100790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100790
Mollick, E. R., & Mollick, L. (2023). Assigning AI: Seven approaches for students, with prompts. SSRN Working Paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4391243
Santhosh, K. K., Babu, M. S., & Geetha, M. (2023). Exploring the power and impact of ChatGPT in education. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 36(Special Issue).
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2019). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (8th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Sugihartono. (2020). Pendidikan personalisasi dalam era kecerdasan buatan: Kajian implementasi di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Teknologi Informasi, 7(1), 13–22.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D (Edisi ke-2). Alfabeta.
Wirawan, Y. E. (2019). Pendidikan di era kecerdasan buatan: Konsep, aplikasi, dan tantangan. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(4), 529–537.
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson Education.
Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Wulandari, M., Arifin, Z., & Ropikoh, M. (2021). Penggunaan ChatGPT dalam pembelajaran mahasiswa: Peluang dan ancaman. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan Indonesia, 4(2), 78–89.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
