MENGENAL TIGA PILAR KUALITAS SOAL: DAYA BEDA, TINGKAT KESUKARAN, DAN PENGECOH

Authors

  • Wafda Sabilla Universitas Islam Negeri K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan
  • Ma'mun Hanif Universitas Islam Negeri K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan
  • Indah Ayu Febriana Universitas Islam Negeri K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan
  • Slamet Gunawan Universitas Islam Negeri K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan
  • Kharis Barik Lana Universitas Islam Negeri K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i02.47029

Keywords:

item analysis, discriminating power, difficulty level, distractor effectiveness, evaluation instrument

Abstract

Item quality is an important factor in determining the validity and reliability of educational evaluation instruments. This study aims to examine three main pillars in item quality analysis, namely discriminating power, difficulty level, and distractor effectiveness, in the context of improving the quality of multiple-choice evaluation instruments in learning activities. This study uses a literature study method by collecting and synthesizing various scientific references related to the topic studied including books, national journals, and articles obtained through Google Scholar. The findings of the study revealed that discriminating power has a primary function as a tool to differentiate between students with high abilities and students with low abilities, with an ideal index value that should reach ≥ 0.40. The difficulty level describes the degree of ease or difficulty of a question item, with an ideal index in the medium range of 0.31–0.70. Meanwhile, distractor effectiveness refers to the ability of incorrect answer alternatives to influence students who have not yet mastered the material to choose it. A distractor is considered to function well and is declared effective if it is chosen by at least 5% of the total participants who take the test. These three components are interrelated and complementary in determining the overall quality of a test item. This research's contribution lies in providing a comprehensive theoretical framework for educators to analyze and improve the quality of evaluation instruments, ensuring that the tests used in the assessment process accurately, validly, and reliably measure student learning outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afryaningsih, Y., Harjanto, A., & Fatmawati, R. A. (2022). Kedalaman Butir Soal Pilihan Ganda Penilaian Akhir Semester Ganjil Kelas V SD. Edu Cendikia: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 2(02), 403–409. https://doi.org/10.47709/educendikia.v2i02.1694

Arikunto, S. (2018). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Bumi Aksara. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.66770/tlrj.v1i4.81

Basri, M., Sultan, S., Rapi, M., Baharman, B., & Sakaria, S. (2025). Meningkatkan Kompetensi Evaluasi Pembelajaran melalui Pelatihan Analisis Butir Soal bagi Mahasiswa Calon Guru. Mallomo: Journal of Community Service, 5(2), https://doi.org/10.55678/mallomo.v5i2.2031. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55678/mallomo.v5i2.2031

Erfan, M., Maulyda, M. A., Hidayati, V. R., Astria, F. P., & Ratu, T. (2020). Tes Klasik Dan Model Rasch. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review, 3(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v3i1.24080

Hera Apriliana Saputri Zulhijrah, Nabila Joti Larasati, S. (2023). Analisis Instrumen Assesmen : Validitas, Reliabilitas, Tingkat Kesukaran Dan Daya Beda Butir Soal. Jurnal Ilmiah Pgsd Fkip Universitas Mandiri, 2986–2995. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36989/didaktik.v9i5.2268

Iskandar, A., & Rizal, M. (2018). Analisis kualitas soal di perguruan tinggi berbasis aplikasi TAP. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 22(1), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v22i1.15609

Ivtari Savika, H., & Aminatuz Zuhriyah, I. (2024). Peran Analisis Butir Soal Terhadap Kualitas Soal, Kompetensi Guru, Dan Prestasi Belajar Peserta Didik Di Sekolah Dasar. Pandu : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Dan Pendidikan Umum, 2(2), 43–51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59966/pandu.v2i2.856

Kurniasi, E. R., Y, Y., & Karennisa, F. (2020). Analisis Soal Ulangan Harian Matematika Kelas IX SMP Negeri 1 Toboali. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan (JIP) STKIP Kusuma Negara, 12(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.37640/jip.v12i1.276

Lestari, K. E., & Yudhanegara, M. R. (2017). Analisis Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Mahasiswa pada Mata Kuliah Geometri Transformasi Berdasarkan Latar Belakang Pendidikan Menengah. Jurnal Matematika Integratif, 13(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.24198/jmi.v13.n1.11410.29-34

Muhadi. (2025). Evaluasi Perencanaan Desain Pembelajaran, Pelaksanaan Proses Kegiatan Pembelajaran,dan Evaluasi Instrumen Hasil Pembelajaran. Edu Society: Jurnal Pendidikan, Ilmu Sosial, Dan PengabdianKepada Masyarakat, 5(2), 160.

Qadir, Huda, H. (2024). Analisis Butir Tes: Tingkat Kesukaran, Daya Pembeda, Evektivitas Pengecoh. Cv.Eureka Media Aksara, 3(3), 105–134.

Rishan, M., & Sulaiman, S. (2023). Analisis Butir Soal Tipe Multiple Choice Ujian Akhir Semester Ganjil Kelas X Tahun Ajaran 2022/2023 Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam di SMA Negeri 1 Padang. Islamika, 5(3), 981–997. https://doi.org/10.36088/islamika.v5i3.3517

Sofiani Putri Radja , Vidriana Oktoviana Bano, A. T. I. (2023). Analisis Kualitas Butir Soal Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Berdasarkan Tingkat Kesukaran, Daya Beda Dan Efektivitas Pengecoh Di Sman 1 Pandawai. Jurnal Edusavana, 1(1), 11–41. https://doi.org/Universitas http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1156-6758

Solichin, M. (2017). Analisis Daya Beda Soal, Taraf Kesukaran, Validitas Butir Tes, Interpretasi Hasil Tes dan Validitas Ramalan dalam Evaluasi Pendidikan. Dirasat: Jurnal Manajemen Dan Pendidikan Islam, 2(2), 195. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26594/dirasat.v2i2.879

Uno, H. B., & Koni, S. (2018). Assessment Pembelajaran. (PT Bumi (ed.)).

Wulandari, A., & Pramusinto, H. (2020). Analisis Kualitas Butir Soal Ujian Akhir Semester Ganjil Mata Pelajaran Otomatisasi Tata Kelola Sarana dan Prasarana Kelas XI Otomatisasi dan Tata Kelola Perkantoran. Economic Education Analysis Journal, 9(2), 366–378.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-28