PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PASPOR (PAIRING, SQUARE, PRESENTATION, REPETITION) TERHADAP PEMAHAMAN SISWA DALAM PENULISAN PSEUDOCODE PADA MATA PELAJARAN INFORMATIKA

Authors

  • Lena Putri Dewi Universitas Rokania
  • Jufri Jufri Universitas Rokania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i2.46254

Keywords:

cooperative learning, informatics, paspor learning model, pseudocode understanding

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of the PASPOR learning model (Pairing, Square, Presentation, Repetition) on students' understanding in pseudocode writing in Informatics subject for 10th grade students at SMA Negeri 1 Pendalian IV Koto. A pre-experimental design with one-group pretest-posttest was employed. The sample consisted of 30 students selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected using essay-based pretest and posttest instruments, student activity observation sheets, and model implementation checklists. All instruments were validated by two experts with an average validity score of 88.15% (very valid category). Results indicated that the mean pretest score of 42.17 increased to 79.83 on posttest, with a mean N-Gain of 0.62 (medium category). The paired sample t-test produced a t-value of -12.407 with 29 degrees of freedom (df = 29) and a significance value (Sig. 2-tailed) of 0.000; therefore, H is accepted. Student activity was in the active category at 80.00%, and teacher implementation of the PASPOR model reached 93.75% (very good category). Therefore, the PASPOR learning model significantly affects the improvement of students' understanding in pseudocode writing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.

Apriliyanti, A. K. P. (2024). Efektivitas penerapan model pembelajaran Think Pair Share dalam meningkatkan pemahaman siswa terhadap materi ide pokok dan ide pendukung teks deskripsi di kelas IX-B SMP Negeri 5 Samarinda. Jurnal Inovasi Refleksi Profesi Guru, 1(2), 60–65. https://doi.org/10.30872/jirpg.v1i2.4553

Dwikalsum, & Yahfizham. (2025). Integrasi berpikir algoritmik dalam strategi pembelajaran literasi ICT di pendidikan tinggi. EduCurio: Education Curiosity, 3(3), 678–681.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education 8th Edition (8 th).

Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing change/gain scores. Department of Physics, Indiana University.

Hidayat, E. Y., Affandy, & Pertiwi, A. (2020). Pembelajaran computational thinking untuk siswa SMA Institut Indonesia Semarang. Abdimasku, 3(3), 93–98.

Jufri, Asrial, Johari, A., & Kamid. (2025a). Evaluating the theoretical validity of the PASPOR model for enhancing mathematical communication in teacher education. Journal of Advanced Sciences and Mathematics Education, 5(1), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.58524/jasme.v5i1.744

Jufri, Asrial, Johari, A., & Kamid. (2025b). Impact of PASPOR learning model on improving students’ mathematical communication skills. Al-Jabar: Pendidikan Matematika, 16(1), 257–270.

Lestari, V. A., Arianto, R., Anindito, B. S., Taramita, Y. K., Amalia, L., & Triswidrananta, O. D. (2022). Aplikasi Pembelajaran Rekonstruksi Algoritma Pseudocode dengan Pendekatan Element Fill-In-Blank Problems di Pemrograman Java. Jurnal Teknik Ilmu Dan Aplikasi, 3(2), 154–162.

Manik, J. M., Muhammad, E., Jonemaru, A., & Afirianto, T. (2023). Pengembangan gim edukasi konsep algoritma pada mata pelajaran Informatika sekolah menengah pertama menggunakan MDA Framework. Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi Dan Ilmu Komputer, 7(8), 3595–3604. https://doi.org/10.25126/jtiik.2023784781

Moeis, D., & Yunarti, S. (2022). Pelatihan logika dan algoritma pemrograman bagi siswa SMAN 3 Makassar. SELAPARANG: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Berkemajuan, 6, 1008–1012.

Mufit, F., Festiyed, F., Fauzan, A., & Lufri, L. (2018). Impact of learning model based on cognitive conflict toward student’s conceptual understanding. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 335, 12072.

Pratama, A., Maulani, E., & Nanda, S. A. (2024). PKM pendampingan edukasi peluang lulusan engineer, information technology dan tantangan dalam dunia industri di SMK Negeri 3 Lhokseumawe. Jurnal Malikussaleh Mengabdi, 3(1), 138–147. https://doi.org/10.29103/jmm.v3i1.14249

Sari, K., & Susanti, A. (2025). Efektivitas model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD dalam meningkatkan pemahaman konsep. LEARNING: Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 5(2), 816–824.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R & D. CV. Alfabeta.

Sundayana, H. R. (2018). Statistika penelitian pendidikan. Penerbit Alfabeta.

Vrachnos, E., & Jimoyiannis, A. (2017). Secondary education students ’ difficulties in algorithmic problems with arrays : An analysis using the SOLO taxonomy. 10(1), 31–52.

Wulandari, L., Khairuddin, Jasmienti, & Darmawati, G. (2025). Pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw terhadap hasil belajar siswa pada pembelajaran Informatika. Jurnal PTI, 9, 45–52.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-29