KALKULASI EFISIENSI, KONDISI JPO, DAN NORMA SOSIAL: PERILAKU MAHASISWA MENYEBERANG TANPA MELALUI JEMBATAN PENYEBERANGAN ORANG

Authors

  • Yatti Rosmiati Universitas Pamulang
  • Akhmad Nana Makmur Universitas Pamulang
  • Heri Kurnia Universitas Pamulang
  • Akhirudin Universitas Pamulang
  • Mas Fierna Janvierna Lusie Putri Universitas Pamulang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i02.46187

Keywords:

pedestrian bridge, grounded theory, pedestrian behavior, bounded rationality, social norms

Abstract

Pedestrian overpass (PDO) are constructed to ensure the safety of pedestrians; however, a paradox arises when many university students who are considered educated individuals choose not to use them. This study aims to understand the reasons behind students’ avoidance of pedestrian bridges through a grounded theory approach. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with 20 students, behavioral observations, and field notes, and analyzed using open coding, axial coding, and selective coding. The findings reveal three main categories: efficiency calculation, in which students perceive that using pedestrian bridges is not worth the cost in terms of time and effort; bridge conditions, which are often regarded as dark, dirty, uncomfortable, and unsafe; and urban social and cultural norms, where jaywalking is considered socially acceptable because it is practiced by the majority. This study recommends multidimensional interventions, including improving bridge design, fostering new social norms that emphasize safety, and implementing integrated policies that balance design, education, and law enforcement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749- 5978(91)90020-T

Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing Grounded Theory (J. Seaman, Ed.; 2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Cristofaro, M. (2017). Herbert Simon’s bounded rationalityIts historical evolution in management and cross-fertilizing contribution. Journal of Management History, 23(2), 170–190.https://doi.org/10.1108/JMH-11-2016- 0060

Gifford, R. (2014). Environmental psychology matters. Annual Review of Psychology, 65(Volume 65, 2014), 541–579.

https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV- PSYCH-010213- 115048/CITE/REFWORKS

Gitelman, V., Carmel, R., Pesahov, F., & Hakkert, S. (2022). An examination of the influence of crosswalk marking removal on pedestrian safety as reflected in road user behaviours. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 46, 342–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRF.2016.03.007

Goldstein, N. J., Cialdini, R. B., & Griskevicius, V. (2022). A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 472–482. https://doi.org/10.1086/586910

Kusuma, A. (2024). Kajian persepsi masyarakat terhadap penataan ruang publik dan fasilitas pejalan kaki di Kota Semarang. Jurnal Riptek, 18(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.35475/RIPTEK.V18I1.2 55

Loukopoulos, P., Jakobsson, C., Gärling, T., Meland, S., & Fujii, S. (2021). Understanding the process of adaptation to car-use reduction goals. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 9(2), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRF.2005.09.003

Mako, E., & Szakonyi, P. (2023). Evaluation of human behaviour at pedestrian crossings. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 2121–2128.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRPRO.2016.05. 227

Mediana, P. I., Fatgehipon, A. H., & Hidayat, N. A. (2022). Persepsi pengguna jembatan penyeberangan orang tentang penyalahgunaan jembatan penyeberangan orang. Edukasi IPS, 6(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.21009/EIPS.006.01.02

Rosenbloom, T. (2009). Crossing at a red light: Behaviour of individuals and groups. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 12(5), 389- 394.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRF.2009.05.002

Sadeek, S. N., Rahman, M. H., & Rifaat, S. M. (2025). Understanding pedestrian bridge usage considering perception and socio- demographic characteristics of the road users in Dhaka city. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 31,101384. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRIP.2025.10138 4

Saepurrahman, D., Gustian, A., Lestari, S. D., Rahayu, I., Setiadi, N. S., Hidayat, S. Y., & Subiantoro, W. (2025). Study of pedestrian comfort levels (pedestrian paths) in Bandung city center: A case study of Jalan Asia Afrika. Media Komunikasi Dunia Ilmu Sipil, 7(1), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.32585/MODULUS.V7I16821

Sakib, N., Paul, T., Ahmed, M. T., Momin, K. Al, & Barua, S. (2024). Investigating factors influencing pedestrian crosswalk usage behavior in Dhaka city using supervised machine learning techniques. Multimodal Transportation, 3(1), 100108. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MULTRA.2023. 100108

Spears, R. (2021). Social influence and group identity. Annual Review of Psychology, 72(Volume 72, 2021), 367–390.

https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV-PSYCH-070620- 111818/CITE/REFWORKS

Taferry, M. D. (2025). Efektifitas fasilitas jembatan penyeberangan terhadap keselamatan pejalan kaki. Jurnal Aspirasi Teknik Sipil, 2(2), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.35438/ASPAL.V2I2.71

Tezcan, H. O., Elmorssy, M., & Aksoy, G. (2019). Pedestrian crossing behavior at midblock crosswalks. Journal of Safety Research, 71, 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSR.2019.09.014

Thaler, R. H., Sunstein, C. R., & Rooze, S. (2009). Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. In Penguin (1sted. Penguin). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/2 35413094_NUDGE_Improving_Decisions About_Health_Wealth_and_Happiness

Downloads

Published

2026-04-25