IMPLIKATUR PERCAKAPAN TOKOH DALAM NOVEL LOVE IS PUNISHMENT KARYA WINDY IRIANTI

Authors

  • Ramadhian Alifa Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Johar Amir Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Tuty Wijayanti Universitas Negeri Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i02.45695

Keywords:

conversational implicature, novel, pragmatics

Abstract

This study aims to: (1) Describe the types of conversational implicatures of characters in the novel Love Is Punishment by Windy Irianti which include general conversational implicatures and specific conversational implicatures; and (2) the principle of cooperation of characters in the novel Love Is Punishment by Windy Irianti which includes the maxims of quantity, quality, relevance, and implementation and (3) violations of the principle of cooperation of characters in the novel Love Is Punishment by Windy Irianti. This type of research is qualitative descriptive research. The research data are in the form of utterances, dialogues, and excerpts of conversations between characters that contain conversational implicatures. The data source for this research is the novel Love Is Punishment by Windy Irianti. Data collection was carried out through reading and note-taking techniques with the stages of intensive reading, identifying utterances containing implicatures, and classifying data according to the focus of the research. The research instrument was the researcher herself who was assisted by a conversational implicature classification table based on Grice's theory. Data analysis was carried out using the Miles and Huberman model which includes data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The results of the study show that: (1) the character dialogues in the novel Love Is Punishment contain general and specific conversational implicatures which are used to convey meaning indirectly; (2) in addition, the cooperative principle of the character's conversation contains the maxims of quantity, quality, relevance and implementation, and (3) violations of the cooperative principle of the four maxims are also found which are influenced by the context of the situation, the character's emotions, and the strategy for conveying meaning. Thus, conversational implicatures play an important role in building communication dynamics, character characterization, and conveying pragmatic meaning in the novel.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ananda, S. W., & Astuti, S. P. (2024). Implikatur percakapan dan pelanggaran prinsip kerja sama dalam novel Kisah untuk Geri karya Erisca Febriani. NUSA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra, 19(1), 95–108.

Amalia, G., Maria L.A.S., & Luthfiyanti, L. (2020). Implikatur Percakapan Dalam Novel Sirkus Pohon Karya Andrea Hirata Dan Implementasinya Terhadap Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Di SMA. Jurnal Locana, 3(2), 13–22.

Amirudin, A., & Septiani, D. (2022). Implikatur Percakapan dalam Novel Lingkar Tanah Lingkar Air Karya Ahmad Tohari (Kajian Pragmatik). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Sasindo, 2(2).

Arifianti, I., & Kusumaningsih, D. (2024). Interpretasi Pragmatik melalui Implikatur Konvensional dan Nonkonvensional dalam Debat Capres Indonesia 2024. Ranah: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, 13(2), 268.

Fitria, Tuti. 2010. Pragmatik: Sebuah Kajian Awal. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Ghony, M. D., & Almanshur, F. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Malang: UIN-Maliki Press.

Grice, H.P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In Peter Cole and J.L. Morgan (eds.) Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts, New York: Academic Press.

Hadi, S. (2015). Metodologi Riset. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Haliko, M.K. (2017). Implikatur Percakapan Dalam Talk Show Hitam Putih Di Trans 7 Maryati. Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 2(1), 77–85.

Herlina, D. I., Wiarsih, A., & Yudin, J. (2024). Fungsi implikatur percakapan dalam novel Kerumunan Terakhir karya Okky Madasari. Tekstual: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Humaniora, 22(2), 98–113.

Irawan, W., & Herwin. (2020). Pragmatik: Teori dan pembelajarannya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Kurhastanti, Ernie. 2015. Pragmatik: Teori dan Kajian Nusantara. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Leech, Geoffrey. (1993). Prinsip-prinsip Pragmatik. Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Indonesia (UI-Press).

Legisyha, A., Shanty, I. L., Elfitra, L., & Wahyusari, A. (2024). Analisis Implikatur Percakapan Tokoh dalam Film Ranah 3 Warna Karya Ahmad Fuadi. 13(2).

Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mahsun, M. (2006). Metode Penelitian Bahasa: Tahapan, Strategi, Metode, dan Tekniknya. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.

Maulana, N., & Saraswati. (2025). Analisis implikatur percakapan khusus dalam novel Si Anak Spesial karya Tere Liye. Literasi, 9(1), 24-31. Universitas Mathla’ul Anwar Banten.

Mar’ati, M., & Sari, N. (2019). Implikatur dan Eksplikatur Percakapan Lokadrama Lara Ati Karya Bayu Skak (Kajian Pragmatik). Alinea: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajaran, 12(1), 102–112.

Marpaung, D. I., Burhanudin, D., & Sinaga, M. (2021). Implikatur Percakapan dalam Novel Melodylan Karya Asri Aci. Jurnal Tuah, 3(2), 131–139.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Pub.

Minderop, A. (2005). Psikologi sastra: Karya sastra, metode, teori, dan contoh kasus. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi revisi, Cet. 38). Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mustika, T. P., & Sinaga, M. (2022). Implikatur dalam Wacana tentang Covid-19 di Media Sosial. Madah: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 13(1), 1–9.

Ningrum, P. S., Phm, S., & Budiawan, R. Y. S. (2023). Implikatur Percakapan dalam Novel Selamat Tinggal Karya Tere Liye. Sasindo, 10(2).

Downloads

Published

2026-04-28