KOMUNIKASI ANTARPERSONAL DALAM PROSES REHABILITASI SOSIAL DI RUMAH SINGGAH DINAS SOSIAL KOTA BEKASI

Authors

  • Yevi Herviyanti Program Magister Komunikasi Koorporat, Fakultas Falsafah dan Peradaban, Universitas Paramadina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i02.44560

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the role of interpersonal communication in the social rehabilitation process at the Bekasi City Social Service Shelter. Interpersonal communication plays a crucial role in building trust between staff members, including part-time government employees (P3K) and daily contract workers (PHL), and beneficiaries known as People with Social Welfare Problems (PPKS), such as street children, homeless individuals, beggars, and other vulnerable groups. This research uses a qualitative approach with a case study method, employing in-depth interviews, participatory observation, and documentation as data collection techniques. The findings indicate that the effectiveness of social rehabilitation is strongly influenced by the quality of interpersonal communication, which includes openness, empathy, supportiveness, positive attitudes, and equality. The shelter employs 18 staff members, consisting of 13 part-time P3K workers and 5 daily contract workers. The Social Service has implemented various development programs, including mental, physical, and spiritual guidance, delivered by qualified professionals. Although the service duration is set at a maximum of seven days, in practice it often exceeds this limit due to challenges in tracing personal data and identifying beneficiaries. During this process, the Social Service conducts referrals and collaborates with various institutions, including other regional governments and the Ministry of Social Affairs. The main obstacles include limited budget, suboptimal coordination, limited human resources, and communication difficulties with certain beneficiaries. Efforts to address these challenges include maximizing service delivery, strengthening collaboration, and expanding networks with relevant institutions. In conclusion, effective interpersonal communication significantly enhances the success of social rehabilitation and promotes behavioral change and independence among beneficiaries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Irwin Altman., & Dalmas Taylor. (1973). Social Penetration: The Development of Interpersonal Relationships. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Charles R. Berger., & Richard J. Calabrese. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1(2), 99–112.

Herbert Blumer. (1969). Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Berkeley: University of California Press.

John W. Creswell. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Joseph A. DeVito. (2016). The Interpersonal Communication Book (14th ed.). New York: Pearson Education.

Norman K. Denzin., & Yvonna S. Lincoln. (2011). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Matthew B. Miles., A. Michael Huberman., & Johnny Saldaña. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

George Herbert Mead. (1934). Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

George C. Homans. (1961). Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. New York: Harcourt Brace.

Peter M. Blau. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-09