ETIKA DAN PENGGUNAAN GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE OLEH SISWA SEKOLAH MENENGAH: TINJAUAN LITERATUR SISTEMATIS

Authors

  • dedy Hendry Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Sumartiningsih Universitas Negeri Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i02.44448

Keywords:

generative artificial intelligence, educational ethics, academic integrity, secondary school students, systematic literature review

Abstract

This article presents a systematic literature review with a PRISMA-informed narrative synthesis on the ethical use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) by lower- and upper-secondary students. Searches were directed to Scopus, ERIC, DOAJ, SINTA, and Moraref for publications from 2023 to March 2026, with emphasis on downloadable full texts discussing student use, academic integrity, AI literacy, cognitive implications, and school policy. Forty-five documents met the inclusion criteria. The synthesis identifies three recurrent patterns. First, GenAI is used primarily to accelerate procedural work, including brainstorming, essay revision, translation, step-by-step support in mathematics, and assistance in programming tasks. Second, the boundary between legitimate learning support and academic misconduct is increasingly blurred because GenAI can generate fluent outputs that conceal limited student reasoning and authorship. Third, institutional responses remain uneven; many schools oscillate between prohibition and uncritical adoption while still lacking coherent guidance on disclosure, assessment design, data protection, and teacher development. Overall, the literature suggests that GenAI should be positioned as a supervised learning aid rather than a substitute for students’ intellectual work. For Islamic junior secondary schools and madrasah, the review proposes a character-based AI literacy orientation that aligns responsible technology use with honesty, accountability, verification, and disciplined thinking

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams, C., Pente, P., Lemermeyer, G., & Rockwell, G. (2023). Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in K-12 education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100131.

Agustini, N. P. O. (2023). Examining the role of ChatGPT as a learning tool in promoting students’ English language learning autonomy relevant to Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar. Edukasia, 4(2).

Aisyah, Sopingi, I., & Hidayati, A. (2025). Screening artificial intelligence (AI) menurut Hadrotus Syaikh KH. Hasyim Asy’ari: Telaah Kitab Adabul ‘Alim wal Muta’allim. Thoriqotuna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.47971/tjpi.v8i1.1508

Alasgarova, R., & Rzayev, J. (2024). The role of artificial intelligence in shaping high school students’ motivation. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 8(2), 311–324.

Alfarwan, A. (2025). Generative AI use in K-12 education: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1647573. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1647573

Andersen, G., & Yang, S. (2025). A survey of K-12 teachers’ perspectives on teaching with generative artificial intelligence. The Advocate, 30(2).

Astuti, A., Thoha, M., Dahliah, J., Maryanti, A., Ambarita, D., Rifa’i, & Hidayat, T. (2025). Etika penggunaan AI di sekolah: Menyeimbangkan inovasi dengan integritas akademik. RIGGS: Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business, 4(2), 5893–5900. https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v4i2.1639

Australian Department of Education. (2025). Australian framework for generative artificial intelligence (AI) in schools.

Avsec, S., & Rupnik, D. (2025). From transformative agency to AI literacy: Profiling Slovenian technical high school students through the Five Big Ideas lens. Systems, 13(7), 562.

Bastani, H., Bastani, O., Sungu, A., Ge, H., Kabakcı, Ö., & Mariman, R. (2025). Generative AI without guardrails can harm learning: Evidence from high school mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 122(26), e2422633122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2422633122

Bittle, K., & El-Gayar, O. (2025). Generative AI and academic integrity in higher education: A systematic review and research agenda. Information, 16(4), 296. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16040296

Cetin, Y., Taş, Ö., Alakuş, H., & Kaplan, H. İ. (2024). Examining school principals’ and teachers’ perceptions of using ChatGPT in education. Educational Process: International Journal, 13(3).

Černochová, M., Selcuk, H., Cohen, A., Voštinár, P., Cohen, G., Yaakov, A. A., Jeřábek, T., Beneš, M., & Škrinárová, J. (2026). Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in K-12 education. Pedagogika, 75(4).

College Board. (2025, October 6). New research: Majority of high school students use generative AI for schoolwork. https://newsroom.collegeboard.org/new-research-majority-high-school-students-use-generative-ai-schoolwork

Department for Education. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence (AI) in education.

Dochia, I. (2024). Students’ perception of ChatGPT’s utility in learning English as a second language: An exploratory study. International Journal of Social and Educational Innovation, 11(22).

García-López, I. M., & Trujillo-Liñán, L. (2025). Ethical and regulatory challenges of generative AI in education: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 10.

Ginige, J. A., Rana, K., Tague, R., Lum, B., Foxwell, H., & Ienna, M. (2026). An Australian cross-sectional study exploring the potential role of generative AI in high school computer programming education. Computer Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2026.2621720

Gonzalez, A. (2024). The impact of ChatGPT on academic integrity among students ages 12–19 in the Tri-State Area. The Young Researcher, 8(1), 4–17.

Granström, M., & Oppi, P. (2025). Student engagement with AI tools in learning: Evidence from a large-scale Estonian survey. Frontiers in Education, 10.

Hu, D.-X., Pang, D.-D., & Xing, Z. (2025). Evaluating the effects of generative AI on student learning outcomes: Insights from a meta-analysis. Educational Technology & Society, 28(3), 226–240.

Kong, S.-C., Cheung, M.-Y. W., & Tsang, O. (2024). Developing an artificial intelligence literacy framework: Evaluation of a literacy course for senior secondary students using a project-based learning approach. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100214.

Lee, V. R., Pope, D., Miles, S., & Zárate, R. C. (2024). Cheating in the age of generative AI: A high school survey study of cheating behaviors before and after the release of ChatGPT. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100253.

Lin, X., & Tan, H. (2025). A systematic review of generative AI in K-12: Mapping goals, activities, roles, and outcomes via the 3P model. Systems, 13(10), 840.

López Santos, M., Lozano, A., & Blanco Fontao, C. (2025). Analysis of the influence of ChatGPT on secondary education from the perspective of teachers. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 15(2), 302–321.

Marzano, D. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) in teaching and learning processes at the K-12 level: A systematic review. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-025-09853-7

Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/EWZM9535

Mills, K., Ruiz, P., Lee, K.-W., Coenraad, M., Fusco, J., Roschelle, J., & Weisgrau, J. (2024). AI literacy: A framework to understand, evaluate, and use emerging technology. Digital Promise.

National Literacy Trust. (2025). Young people and teachers’ use of generative AI to support literacy in 2025. https://literacytrust.org.uk/research-services/research-reports/young-people-and-teachers-use-of-generative-ai-to-support-literacy-in-2025/

OECD. (2025). Empowering learners for the age of AI: An AI literacy framework for primary and secondary education (review draft).

OECD, & Education International. (2023). Opportunities, guidelines and guardrails for effective and equitable use of AI in education.

Ofosu-Asare, Y. (2025). Guiding the future: Developing an ethical framework for generative AI use in education. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 43(1), 26–44. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-06-2024-0113

Pei, L., Jong, M. S.-Y., Huang, B., Pang, W.-C., & Shang, J. (2025). Formally integrating generative AI into secondary education: Application of ChatGPT in EFL writing instruction. Educational Technology & Society, 28(3), 281–297.

Raehang, Assingkily, M. S., & Ahmad, M. (2025). Integrating artificial intelligence into madrasah learning: A mixed-methods study of intelligent media development and implementation. Cendekiawan: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Studi Keislaman, 4(1), 608–618. https://doi.org/10.61253/cendekiawan.v4i1.322

Sapan, M., & Uzun, L. (2024). The effect of ChatGPT-integrated English teaching on high school EFL learners’ writing skills and vocabulary development. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 12(6), 1657–1677.

Schiel, J., Bobek, B. L., & Schnieders, J. Z. (2023). High school students’ use and impressions of AI tools. ACT Research.

Septiana, R. A., Sopingi, I., & Hidayati, A. (2025). Adab penggunaan artificial intelligence (AI) dalam keilmuan: Tinjauan Kitab Adabul Alim Wal Muta’allim. Revorma: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pemikiran, 5(1), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.62825/revorma.v5i1.134

Stanford SCALE Initiative. (2026). The evidence base on AI in K-12: A 2026 review. Stanford University.

Taktak, M., Bellibaş, M. Ş., & Özgenel, M. (2024). Use of ChatGPT in education: Future strategic road map with SWOT analysis. Educational Process: International Journal, 13(3), 7–21.

Traga Philippakos, Z. A., & Rocconi, L. (2025). AI literacy: Elementary and secondary teachers’ use of AI-tools, reported confidence, and professional development needs. Education Sciences, 15(9), 1186.

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. (2023). Artificial intelligence and the future of teaching and learning: Insights and recommendations.

Walkington, C., Pando, M., Lipsmeyer, L. L., Beauchamp, T., Sager, M., & Milton, S. (2025). Middle school girls using generative AI to engage in mathematical problem-posing. School Science and Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2025.2542724

Waziana, W., Andewi, W., Wibisono, D., Hastomo, T., & Muslihudin, M. (2025). Exploring ChatGPT’s impact on critical, creative, and reflective thinking skills: A mixed-methods study in an Indonesian EFL classroom. Applied Research on English Language, 14(4), 77–114.

Wu, D., & Zhang, J. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence in secondary education: Applications and effects on students’ innovation skills and digital literacy. PLOS ONE, 20(5), e0323349. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323349

Wu, C.-H., Weng, T.-S., & Liu, C.-H. (2025). Exploring ChatGPT’s potential to enhance problem-solving and critical thinking in education. Educational Technology & Society, 28(2), 310–326.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-07