PENGARUH MODEL PREDICT-OBSERVE-EXPLAIN (POE) TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KREATIF SISWA PADA MATERI LARUTAN ELEKTROLIT DAN NON ELEKTROLIT

Authors

  • M. Raidil Universitas Cenderawasih

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i02.44356

Keywords:

Creative Thinking, Electrolyte and Non-Electrolyte Solutions, POE

Abstract

This study aims to examine the extent to which the application of the Predict-Observe-Explain (POE) model has a significant effect on students' creative thinking skills on the topic of electrolyte and non-electrolyte solutions. Using a quasi-experimental approach with a Pretest-Posttest Nonequivalent Control Group design, which describes the causal relationship between variables. The sample was selected randomly, with the experimental class applying the POE model and the control class using the CPS learning approach. The research instruments included creative thinking observation sheets, student activities, and teacher activities, while data analysis was carried out using the t-test. The results of the creative thinking observation showed that the average creative thinking score of the control class was 51.42, which is in the fairly good category, while the experimental class obtained an average of 54.53 with the same category. When viewed based on the results of observations of student activities, it shows that the average creative thinking score of the control class was 67.74, which is in the good category, while the experimental class obtained an average of 68.33, which is in the good category. Data were analyzed using the t-test, after previously conducting normality and homogeneity tests. The test results show that there is a significant difference between the two classes, indicated by the t-count value which is greater than the t-table, namely 2.77 > 1.67.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdurrahman, A., & Widodo, A. (2015). Pengaruh model pembelajaran Predict-Observe-Explain terhadap penguasaan konsep dan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 11(2), 148–155. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v11i2.4082.

Bahroini, L., dan Agustin., 2017, Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Predict-Observe-Explain terhadap Kreativitas, JKPM Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1).

Cropley, A. J. (2001). Creativity in education and learning: A guide for teachers and educators. London: Kogan Page.

Erni, M., Napitupulu, M., dan Sakung., 2013, Pengaruh Model POE Predict-Observe-Explain) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Kimia pada Kelas XI Materi Kelarutan dan Hasil Kali Kelarutan di SMA Negeri 4 Pasangkayu, Jurnal Akademika Kimia, 2(2).

Hosnan, M., 2016, Etika Profesi Pendidik: Pembinaan dan Pemantapan Kinerja Guru, Kepala Sekolah, Serta Pengawas Sekolah, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Johnstone, A. H. (2000). Teaching of chemistrylogical or psychological? Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 1(1), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1039/A9RP90001B.

Maghfuroh, M, A., dan Rochmad, R., 2019, Pembelajaran POE dengan Pendekatan Open Ended untuk Meningkatkan Kreativitas, Pendidikan Matematika Ahmad Dahlan, 6(1).

Munandar, U. (2012). Pengembangan kreativitas anak berbakat. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Rejeki, P., 2016, Efektifitas Gabungan Tes Subjektif dan Tes Objektif dalam Mengevalusi Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa SMP Negeri 11 Banda Aceh, Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa, 1(3).

Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms–technical manual. Lexington, MA: Ginn and Company.

Treagust, D. F., Chandrasegaran, A. L., & Duit, R. (2010). Multiple representations in learning chemistry: Some implications for research and teaching. In J. K. Gilbert & D. Treagust (Eds.), Multiple representations in chemical education (pp. 103–132). Springer.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3832-0_5.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-04