INTEGRASI ASESMEN MULTILITERASI DALAM PEMBELAJARAN MENDALAM IPAS : ANALISIS OBSERVASI KELAS PADA MATERI METAMORFOSIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i02.44329Keywords:
Multiliteracy Assessment, Deep Learning, PBL, IPAS, Primary Education, Asesmen multiliterasi, Pembelajaran Mendalam, PBL, IPAS, Sekolah DasarAbstract
This study aims to analyze the integration of multiliteracy assessment in deep learning-based IPAS instruction on metamorphosis material in a third-grade classroom. Using a qualitative descriptive-analytic case study approach, the research explores a single learning cycle implemented through the Problem Based Learning (PBL) model at SD Negeri 4 Kaumrejo. Data were collected through document analysis, video-based observation, and semi-structured interviews, and analyzed using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña. The findings reveal that multiliteracy assessment is substantially integrated, as reflected in the presence of various literacy modes linguistic, visual, oral, spatial, digital, critical, and social across learning phases, with peak integration during investigation and presentation activities. Authentic assessments such as concept maps and dioramas effectively capture students’ multimodal competencies. However, gaps remain in the explicit assessment of digital and critical literacy, assessment differentiation, and structured student reflection. The study highlights the need for more comprehensive and specific rubrics to optimize multiliteracy assessment practices in primary education.
Downloads
References
Barrows, H. S. (1996). Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 68, 3–12.
Begg, M. (2022). Authentic multimodal assessment in primary education: Rethinking evidence of learning. Journal of Literacy Research, 54(2), 112–138.
Brookhart, S. M. (2013). How to create and use rubrics for formative assessment and grading. ASCD.
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (Eds.). (2012). Literacies. Cambridge University Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Fullan, M., Quinn, J., & McEachen, J. (2018). Deep learning: Engage the world change the world. Corwin Press.
Jewitt, C. (2008). Multimodality and literacy in school classrooms. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 241–267.
Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2012). Literacies. Cambridge University Press.
Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I — Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4–11.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92.
Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi RI. (2022). Panduan Pembelajaran dan Asesmen Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Pendidikan Dasar, dan Menengah. Kemendikbudristek.
(2025). Modul Ajar Pembelajaran Mendalam: Materi Metamorfosis IPAS Kelas 3 SD Negeri 4 Kaumrejo. Dinas Pendidikan Kabupaten Malang.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.