INTEGRASI MEDIA STEM–AR DALAM PEMBELAJARAN MATERI LAPISAN BUMI PADA SISWA SEKOLAH DASAR

Authors

  • Iqbal Yulianto Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Lulu’ Arifatun Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Eka Titi Anadaryani Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Sri Sumartiningsih Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Philip X. Fuchs Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i01.43748

Keywords:

augmented reality, STEM, learning media, Earth’s layers, scientific literacy

Abstract

This study aimed to develop and evaluate the feasibility, practicality, and effectiveness of a Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics–Augmented Reality (STEM–AR)–based learning media on the topic of Earth’s layers for fifth-grade elementary school students. The research employed a Research and Development (R&D) approach using the ADDIE model, which consists of the stages of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. The participants were fifth-grade students of SDN Miroto Semarang Tengah. Data were collected through expert validation, student response questionnaires, and pretest–posttest assessments, and were analyzed using descriptive quantitative and qualitative methods. The results of expert validation indicated that the developed STEM–AR learning media met the criteria of high feasibility in terms of content accuracy, visual design, and interactivity. The limited trial results showed positive student responses, indicating a high level of practicality and ease of use. Furthermore, the effectiveness analysis revealed an improvement in students’ learning outcomes, as evidenced by an increase in the average score from 62.00 in the pretest to 84.00 in the posttest. These findings suggest that the integration of augmented reality with a STEM approach facilitates students’ understanding of abstract Earth science concepts through interactive three-dimensional visualization and integrated learning activities. Therefore, the STEM–AR learning media is considered feasible, practical, and effective, and has the potential to serve as an innovative instructional tool to enhance scientific literacy and student engagement in elementary science learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Astuti, R., Prasetyo, Z. K., & Widodo, A. (2024). Improving elementary students’ scientific literacy through earth science learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 13(1), 45–55.

Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2022). Emergency remote teaching in higher education: Mapping the first global online semester. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 50.

Branch, R. M. (2021). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer.

Bybee, R. W. (2023). STEM education: Preparing for the future. National Science Teaching Association Press.

Cheng, K. H., Tsai, C. C., & Chen, H. R. (2024). Augmented reality in science education: A review of research trends and learning outcomes. Computers & Education, 194, 104693.

English, L. D. (2023). STEM education in the primary school: A review of research and practice. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), 45.

Garzón, J., Pavón, J., & Baldiris, S. (2022). Systematic review and meta-analysis of augmented reality in educational settings. Virtual Reality, 26(2), 473–496.

Kenedi, A. K., Helsa, Y., Ariani, Y., Zainil, M., & Hendri, S. (2024). STEM-based learning to improve elementary students’ conceptual understanding in science learning. Journal of Science Learning, 7(1), 120–129.

Krajcik, J., McNeill, K. L., & Reiser, B. J. (2023). Learning-goals-driven design model: Developing curriculum materials that align with national standards and incorporate project-based pedagogy. Science Education, 107(2), 345–367.

Makransky, G., & Petersen, G. B. (2022). Immersive virtual and augmented reality for learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 34(3), 1245–1280.

Martín-Gutiérrez, J., Mora, C. E., Añorbe-Díaz, B., & González-Marrero, A. (2023). Virtual technologies trends in education. Education Sciences, 13(2), 145.

Mutakinati, L., Anwari, I., & Yoshisuke, K. (2023). Analysis of students’ critical thinking skills in STEM learning. Journal of Science Education Research, 12(2), 101–112.

OECD. (2023). Education at a glance 2023: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing.

Pellas, N., Mystakidis, S., & Christopoulos, A. (2023). A systematic literature review of augmented reality in education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), 1–37.

Plomp, T. (2021). Educational design research: An introduction. In T. Plomp & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 9–35). Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development.

Rahmawati, D., Siregar, E., & Nugroho, A. (2025). STEM-integrated augmented reality to enhance scientific literacy in elementary science learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 34(1), 78–90.

Siew, N. M., Amir, N., & Chong, C. L. (2024). The perceptions of primary school teachers on STEM education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(2), em2387.

Siregar, R., Yuliono, T., & Hidayat, A. (2024). Development of augmented reality learning media in elementary science learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Indonesia, 9(1), 15–24.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-16