ANALISIS SEMANTIK TERHADAP PENGGUNAAN BAHASA TERSELUBUNG DALAM KASUS NARKOTIKA: STUDI LINGUISTIK FORENSIK PADA PERNYATAAN TEDDY MINAHASA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i01.43190Keywords:
forensic linguistics, semantics, language analysis, linguistic evidence, narcoticsAbstract
This study aims to analyze the role of language in a legal context through a forensic linguistics approach to statements made by Teddy Minahasa in the narcotics case that ensnared him. This study focuses on semantic analysis using a contextual semantic approach referring to Contextual Semantics Theory, an approach that understands the meaning of utterances based on the context of the situation, the relationship between speakers, and the background of the speech event. The research data was obtained from various accountable sources, including WhatsApp conversation transcripts found on witness Linda Pujiastuti's cell phone that were spread in online media coverage, as well as video recordings of interviews and trials related to the case. The data were analyzed to identify the meaning of utterances, word choice, and the context of language use in communication related to the legal case. The results of the study indicate that the meaning of utterances in the analyzed statements is influenced by the communication context and the underlying legal situation. This finding confirms that a contextual semantic approach in forensic linguistics is important to use to understand the meaning of language more comprehensively so that it can support a more objective interpretation of language evidence in a criminal case.
Downloads
References
Achmad Ulin Nuha, I. F. (2022). ANALISIS CURHAT KORBAN KEJAHATAN ASUSILA MENGGUNAKAN PENDEKATAN SEMANTIK: KAJIAN LINGUISTIK FORENSIK. KREDO: Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa dan Sastra, 547-562.
Chaer, A. (2009). Pengantar semantik bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Chaer, A. (2013). Linguistik umum. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Coulthard, M. &. (2007). Introduction to Forensic Linguistics: Language in Evidence. London: Routledge.
Coulthard, M. (2013). An introduction to forensic linguistics: Language in evidence. London: Routledge.
Dinul Furqan, M. M. (2022). Analisis Bentuk Tuturan Kejahatan Berbahasa (Defamasi) dalam Sosial Media Youtube. Jurnal Konsepsi , 272-281.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Longman.
Ghale, M. (2023, Maret Kamis). Chat Berisi Perintah Teddy Minahasa kepada AKBP Doddy untuk Ganti Sabu dengan Trawas Ditunjukkan Ahli Digital. Retrieved from mediusnews.com: https://www.mediusnews.com/nasional/1327813296/chat-berisi-perintah-teddy-minahasa-kepada-akbp-doddy-untuk-ganti-sabu-dengan-trawas-ditunjukkan-ahli-digital
Gibbons, J. (2003). Forensic linguistics: An introduction to language in the justice system. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Gibbons, J. (2008). Language and the law. London: Longman.
Halid, R. (2019). TINDAK TUTUR PELAKU PECEMARAN NAMA BAIK DI MEDIA SOSIAL KAJIAN LINGUISTIK FORENSIK. KREDO: Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa dan Sastra, 441-458.
Hartono, R. (2023, Februari Selasa). Linda beberkan Teddy Minahasa pakai kode “Invoice”, “Sembako”, dan “Galon”. Retrieved from Espos.id: https://news.espos.id/linda-beberkan-teddy-minahasa-pakai-kode-invoice-sembako-dan-galon-1561750
Herwin, M. S. (2021). ANALISIS KEJAHATAN BERBAHASA DALAM BERSOSIAL MEDIA (LINGUISTIK FORENSIK). Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 159-168.
Ismawati, H. A. (2023). TINDAK KEJAHATAN DALAM FILM MENHUNT UNABOMBER SEBUAH KAJIAN LINGUISTIK FORENSIK. SEBASA Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 416-430.
Karenisa, K. (2019). Penghinaan terhadap Simbol dan Pejabat Negara dalam Kajian Linguistik Forensik. Telaga Bahasa, 55-72.
KOMPASTV. (2023, Maret Rabu). [Full] Hakim Cecar Linda di Hadapan Teddy Minahasa pada Sidang Kasus Narkoba. Retrieved from youtube.com: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dzUoaIWEp74
Kridalaksana, H. (2008). Kamus linguistik. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Leech, G. (1974). Semantics. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Lyons, J. (1995). Linguistic semantics: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McMenamin, G. R. (2002). Forensic linguistics: Advances in forensic stylistics. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Merdeka.com. (2023). Terkuak 'My Jenderal' Nama Teddy Minahasa di Ponsel Linda, Begini Isi Percakapannya. Retrieved from merdeka.com: https://www.merdeka.com/peristiwa/terkuak-my-jenderal-nama-teddy-minahasa-di-ponsel-linda-begini-isi-percakapannya.html?page=4
Palmer, F. R. (1981). Semantics (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK DALAM PERSPEKTIF LINGUISTIK FORENSIK. (2019). Hasnawati Nasution.
Rahman, N. I. (2019). PENGGUNAAN KATA TABU DI MEDIA SOSIAL: KAJIAN LINGUISTIK FORENSIK. 120-128.
Shuy, R. W. (2006). Linguistics in the courtroom: A practical guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Siti Nur Shabrina, Z. T. (2022). Analisis teks hoaks seputar informasi bank: Kajian bahasa perspektif analisis wacana kritis dan linguistik forensik. KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 492-507.
Sudaryat, Y. (2021). MENJADI SAKSI AHLI DALAM LINGUISTIK FORENSIK (Kajian terhadap Bukti Kasus Berbahasa Sunda). JURNAL FORENSIK BERBAHASA, 116-133.
Susanthi, G. A. (2021). Analisis Pencemaran Nama Baik Dengan Kajian Linguistik Forensik. IJFL (International Journal of Forensic Linguistics), 1-3.
van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and power. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Warami, H. (2021). KEJAHATAN BAHASA DI MEDIA SOSIAL PADA WILAYAH HUKUM MANOKWARI: KAJIAN LINGUISTIK FORENSIK. IJFL (International Journal of Forensic Linguistics), 19-26.
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.