TRANSFORMASI SUPERVISI AKADEMIK: DARI ADMINISTRATIF KE COACHING PROFESIONAL BERBASIS MODEL GROW

Authors

  • M Abdul Malik Universitas Pancasakti Tegal
  • DA Nafiati Universitas Pancasakti Tegal
  • S Suriswo Universitas Pancasakti Tegal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i1.43002

Keywords:

educational coaching, GROW model, academic supervision, teacher professionalism

Abstract

Academic supervision plays a strategic role in enhancing teacher professionalism and improving instructional quality in schools. However, in practice, academic supervision is often conducted through an administrative and evaluative approach, limiting its function as a professional development process. This article aims to analyze and synthesize the transformation of academic supervision from an administrative approach to professional coaching based on the GROW model (Goal, Reality, Options, Will). This study employed a qualitative approach using a systematic literature review (SLR) design by analyzing relevant scholarly articles published within the last five years. The findings indicate that integrating GROW-based coaching into academic supervision enhances reflective dialogue, strengthens teachers’ reflective practices, and promotes active teacher engagement in professional development. Academic supervision is repositioned not as a control mechanism but as a collaborative and sustainable professional learning process. These findings highlight the relevance of GROW-based coaching as an effective approach to transforming academic supervision and strengthening instructional leadership in elementary schools.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Lofthouse, R., Leat, D., Towler, C., Hall, E., & Cummings, C. (2010). Coaching for teaching and learning: A practical guide for schools. Centre for Child and Family Research.

Mallem, M. Y. (2010). Instructional supervision: A collaborative approach. Educational Research Quarterly, 33(3), 3–15.

Nafiati, D. A. (2021). Revisi taksonomi Bloom: Kognitif, afektif, dan psikomotorik. Humanika: Kajian Ilmiah Mata Kuliah Umum, 21(2), 151–172.

Prayudha, D. A., Agung, A. A. G., Wiranatha, A. A. K. A. C., & Raharja, I. M. D. (2017). Pengembangan model supervisi akademik berbasis reflektif. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 6(2), 189–198.

Purnomo, F. A., Santosa, B., Hartanto, S., Pratisto, A., & Purbayu, B. (2018). Supervisi akademik dan peningkatan profesionalisme guru. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 10(1), 45–56.

Sergiovanni, T. J. (2015). The principalship: A reflective practice perspective (7th ed.). Pearson Education.

Suriswo, S. (2019). Studi evaluatif pelaksanaan Kurikulum 2013 pada MGBK Kota Tegal. JCOSE: Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling, 2(1), 1–10.

Suriswo, S., & Aulia, F. (2017). Kinerja guru sebagai pengembang Kurikulum 2013. Cakrawala: Jurnal Pendidikan, 11(2), 151–158.

Wang, C. (2012). Instructional supervision and professional development. International Journal of Educational Management, 26(6), 550–563. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513541211251456

Whitmore, J. (2017). Coaching for performance: The principles and practice of coaching and leadership (5th ed.). Nicholas Brealey Publishing.

Zepeda, S. J. (2017). Instructional supervision: Applying tools and concepts (4th ed.). Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-03