PERAN KEPUASAN KERJA DAN WORK ENGAGEMENT DALAM MEMEDIASI PENGARUH DUKUNGAN ORGANISASI DAN KOMPENSASI TERHADAP KINERJA GURU SEKOLAH DASAR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i01.42613Keywords:
Organizational support, compensation, job satisfaction, work engagement, teacher performanceAbstract
Teacher performance is a key factor in determining the success of educational implementation, influenced by organizational and individual psychological factors. Organizational support and compensation are considered external factors that shape teachers’ working conditions, while job satisfaction and work engagement reflect internal psychological conditions that affect the quality of teachers’ professional duties. This study aims to analyze the roles of job satisfaction and work engagement in mediating the effects of organizational support and compensation on elementary school teachers’ performance. This study employed a quantitative approach using a survey method. The research population consisted of 4,239 public elementary school teachers in Kendal Regency, with a sample of 376 teachers selected using the Slovin formula through random sampling. Data were collected using a Likert-scale questionnaire and analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with the assistance of AMOS version 26. The results show that organizational support has a positive and significant effect on teacher performance, while compensation does not have a significant direct effect. Work engagement also has a positive and significant effect on teacher performance. Mediation analysis indicates that work engagement mediates the effects of organizational support and compensation on teacher performance. Moreover, job satisfaction and work engagement sequentially mediate the effect of organizational support on teacher performance partially, and fully mediate the effect of compensation on teacher performance. This study highlights that improving teacher performance requires strengthening organizational support, implementing fair compensation systems, and creating a conducive work environment that enhances teachers’ job satisfaction and work engagement sustainably.
Downloads
References
Abda, A., Sunarti, E., & Zahroh, Z. (2021). Kinerja guru dalam pembelajaran daring dan fak-tor faktor yang mempengaru-hinya. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 28(1), 56–65.
Agustin, F., & Wibowo, A. (2021). Dukungan organisasi terhadap keterlibatan kerja dan kinerja guru. Jurnal Manajemen Pendi-dikan, 9(1), 55–64.
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The Job Demands Resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328.
Colquitt, J. A., Lepine, J. A., & Wes-son, M. J. (2021). Organizational behavior: Improving perfor-mance and commitment in the workplace (6th ed.). McGraw Hill Education.
Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900.
Dinia, Y. S., Abullah, B., Tafsir, A., Beik, I. S., & Indra, H. (2023). Studi Deskriptif Peran Beban Kerja dan Kompensasi terhadap Kinerja Guru pada SDIT dan SDN di Kota Bogor. JIIP-Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(4), 2835-2844.
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hut-chison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational sup-port. Journal of Applied Psy-chology, 71(3), 500–507.
Fauzi, A., Aziz, M., & Yusuf, M. (2021). Evaluasi kualitas guru di negara berkembang: Perspektif GEM Report UNESCO. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 12(1), 33–44.
Ghozali, I. (2017). Model persamaan struktural: Konsep dan aplikasi dengan program AMOS 24.0. Badan Penerbit Universitas Di-ponegoro.
Huang, H., & Revina, S. (2021). The politics of teacher professional development policy reform in decentralized Indonesia. RISE Programme Working Paper.
Kemendikbud. (2015). Hasil Uji Kom-petensi Guru Tahun 2015. Ke-menterian Pendidikan dan Ke-budayaan Indonesia.
Luthans, F. (2021). Organizational behavior: An evidence based approach (14th ed.). McGraw Hill.
Nugroho, Y., & Santoso, H. B. (2023). Tantangan pendidikan di era global dan strategi penguatan sumber daya manusia. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan, 12(1), 11–21.
Olivia, A., & Rozak, H. (2022). Work engagement sebagai mediasi hubungan kompensasi terhadap kinerja guru. Jurnal Kependidi-kan, 10(2), 98–105.
Pangesti, R. D., & Iza, N. (2021). Pe-ran strategis guru dalam pe-ningkatan mutu pendidikan. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengaja-ran, 54(3), 233–241.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2017). Organizational behavior (17th ed.). Pearson Education (us).
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92.
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2021). Teacher burnout: Relations be-tween dimensions of burnout, perceived school context, job satisfaction and motivation for teaching. Teachers and Teach-ing, 27(4), 1029–1048.
Susanto, T. T. D., Solihin, R. R., Fau-ziyah, E. P., Yanti, N. V. I., & Ramadhania, A. P. (2024). Upaya Pemerintah Indonesia dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Guru Ditinjau dari Hasil PISA 2022: Sebuah Kajian Pustaka. Perspektif Ilmu Pendidikan, 38(1), 57–65.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
