ASESMEN DIAGNOSTIK DALAM PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA UNTUK MENGIDENTIFIKASI KESULITAN BELAJAR SISWA SD
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i1.42519Keywords:
diagnostic assessment, mathematics learning difficulties, systematic reviewAbstract
Diagnostic assessment plays a crucial role in identifying mathematics learning difficulties among elementary school students; however, its implementation continues to face various challenges and has never been synthesized comprehensively. This study aims to systematically review the implementation, diverse instruments, and domains of learning difficulties identified through diagnostic assessment in elementary school mathematics instruction. Following the PRISMA guidelines, a literature search was conducted in the Scopus, Web of Science, and ERIC databases, yielding 25 empirical studies indexed in Scopus for thematic analysis. The findings revealed three main themes. First, the implementation of diagnostic assessment is predominantly conducted at the beginning of instruction with teachers as the main actors; however, its effectiveness is constrained by low assessment literacy and the acceleration of digitalization in the post-pandemic era. Second, the range of instruments includes standardized written tests, error analysis, clinical interviews, performance-based assessment, and adaptive digital platforms, each with their respective strengths and limitations. Third, the identified domains of difficulty include conceptual difficulties with fractions and place value, procedural difficulties associated with mathematics anxiety, and problem-solving difficulties complicated by linguistic barriers. This study concludes that diagnostic assessment needs to be reconceptualized as a multidimensional practice that integrates cognitive, affective, and linguistic aspects. The implications emphasize the importance of enhancing teacher assessment literacy, developing hybrid instruments, and adapting context-sensitive technology to realize differentiated and equitable mathematics instruction in elementary schools.
Downloads
References
Anwar, R., Fathony, M. H., Chandra, M. R., Al Basyari, M. M., & Kholid, I. (2025). Coherence of Surah Al-‘Alaq Verses and Their Relevance to Modern Literacy. Jurnal Islam Nusantara, 9(1), 15–27.
Ati, T. P., & Setiawan, Y. (2020). Efektivitas problem based learning-problem solving terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis dalam pembelajaran matematika siswa kelas V. Jurnal Cendekia, 4(1), 294–303.
Aziz, M. A. A., Alqosimi, F. R., Rosiana, R., Ramadani, C., & Kholid, I. (2025). PERAN PENDIDIKAN KEWIRAUSAHAAN SEKOLAH DALAMM MEMBANGUN GENERASI STAR UP: KAJIAN LITERATUR SISTEMATIS. Didaktik: Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang, 12(01), 133–149.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807
Brookhart, S. M. (2023). Classroom assessment essentials. ASCD. https://books.google.com/books?hl=id&lr=&id=p6LjEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT5&dq=Brookhart,+S.+M.+(2023).**+*Classroom+assessment+essentials*.+ASCD&ots=JRPgzLK7QD&sig=tqlhckgOxkYSRWIGHncC5sqQuTI
Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2020). Learning and teaching early math: The learning trajectories approach. Routledge. https://api.taylorfrancis.com/content/books/mono/download?identifierName=doi&identifierValue=10.4324/9781003083528&type=googlepdf
DeLuca, C., LaPointe-McEwan, D., & Luhanga, U. (2016). Teacher assessment literacy: A review of international standards and measures. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 28(3), 251–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-015-9233-6
Doz, E., Cuder, A., Pellizzoni, S., Granello, F., & Passolunghi, M. C. (2024). The interplay between ego-resiliency, math anxiety and working memory in math achievement. Psychological Research, 88(8), 2401–2415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-024-01995-0
Fauzan, F. (2025). Development of a Diagnostic Test for Mathematics Learning Difficulties in Elementary School. The Journal of Academic Science, 2(6), 1628–1638.
Ginsburg, H. (1997). Entering the child’s mind: The clinical interview in psychological research and practice. Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.com/books?hl=id&lr=&id=pfeAgwUNQjsC&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=Ginsburg,+H.+P.+(1997).**+*Entering+the+child%27s+mind:+The+clinical+interview+in+psychological+research+and+practice*.+Cambridge+University+Press.&ots=MyIkNCtpqa&sig=iWRK2ghFy8I8QXO7LHnMKjjCZo4
Hajaroh, S., & Adawiyah, R. (2018). Kesulitan guru dalam mengimplementasikan penilaian autentik. El Midad, 10(2), 131–152.
Hartati, P., Saputra, E., Danim, S., Susanta, A., Yensy, N. A., & Yanti, F. A. (2024). Kecemasan matematika dan pencapaian akademik siswa: Tinjauan literatur sistematis. Jurnal Konseling dan Pendidikan, 12(4), 418–432.
Hidayat, R., Adnan, M., & Abdullah, M. F. N. L. (2022). A systematic literature review of measurement of mathematical modeling in mathematics education context. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(5), em2108.
Higbee, J. L., & Thomas, P. V. (1999). Affective and cognitive factors related to mathematics achievement. Journal of Developmental Education, 23(1), 8.
Ishak, N., Yusoff, N., & Madihie, A. (2020). Resilience in mathematics, academic resilience, or mathematical resilience?: An overview. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(5), 34–39.
Kholid, I. (2024). Karakteristik Berpikir Kritis Siswa dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 10(9), 268–279.
Kholid, I. (2025). Meningkatkan Berpikir Kritis dan Pemahaman Mendalam Matematika melalui STEM dan Merdeka Belajar: Suatu Tinjauan Sistematis. Didik: Jurnal Bersama Ilmu Pendidikan, 1(4), 218–224.
Kholid, I., Al Basyari, M. M., Anam, K., & Lestari, L. (2024). Pelatihan Penyusunan RPP dan Modul Ajar Versi Ringkas dalam Kurikulum Merdeka di SD/MI Se-Kecamatan Compreng Kabupaten Subang. Budimas: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 6(1). https://www.jurnal.stie-aas.ac.id/index.php/JAIM/article/view/12413
Kholid, I., Al Basyari, M. M., Saman, S., Nurhadi, N., & Mulhat, M. (2025). Menumbuhkan Pemahaman Konseptual Matematika Melalui Deep Learning: Sebuah Kajian Sistematik Literatur. Pedagogy: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(4), 1494–1506.
Kholid, I., Chandra, M. R., Nurhadi, H., & Anwar, R. (2025). Pendampingan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah dalam Merancang Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran dan Modul Ajar Kurikulum Merdeka. Qardhul Hasan: Media Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, 11(1). https://ojs.unida.ac.id/QH/article/view/16255
Kholid, I., Fathony, M. H., Rahman, A. Y., & Chandra, M. R. (2024). Analisis hasil belajar siswa berpikir kritis dalam pemecahan masalah matematika. BADA’A: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 6(2), 459–471.
Kholid, I., & Hargina, D. Y. W. (2025). Integrasi Pendidikan Karakter dan Kewirausahaan di Sekolah Dasar: Sintesis Pendekatan Kurikuler-Ekstrakurikuler. GENIUS: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 3(2), 1–11.
Kholid, I., & Puspitasari, P. (2025). Implementasi Model Cooperative Learning Tipe Tebak Kata dalam Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Siswa. AL-HUDA: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 1(2), 74–85.
Kholid, I., Rahayu, R., Fathony, M. H., & Anwar, R. (2025). Strategi dan Tantangan Integrasi Nilai Antikorupsi dalam Kurikulum Merdeka: Kajian Sistematik Literatur. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Citra Bakti, 12(2), 487–497.
Kholid, I., Saman, Nurhadi, & Mulhat. (2025). Bibliometric Analysis of Publications on Problem-Based Learning and Critical Thinking Skills in Mathematics Education. ELEMENTARY: Islamic Teacher Journal, 13(2), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.21043/elementary.v13i2.34382
König, J., Jäger-Biela, D. J., & Glutsch, N. (2020). Adapting to online teaching during COVID-19 school closure: Teacher education and teacher competence effects among early career teachers in Germany. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 608–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1809650
Kusmaryono, I., & Wijayanti, D. (2020). Tinjauan sistematis: Strategis scaffolding pada pembelajaran matematika. Phenomenon: Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 10(1), 102–117.
Lasmanawati, S., Komala, D. A., Hati, N. P., Nurjanah, A., & Khalid, I. (2026). INTEGRASI KEWIRAUSAHAAN SEBAGAI SOLUSI INOVATIF DALAM SISTEM PENDIDIKAN INDONESIA: KAJIAN KUALITATIF DESKRITIF. Al-Irsyad: Journal of Education Science, 5(1), 688–698.
Leib, E. R., Starr, A., Younger, J. W., Bunge, S. A., Uncapher, M. R., Rosenberg-Lee, M., & Consortium, P. iLead. (2023). Testing the whole number interference hypothesis: Contributions of inhibitory control and whole number knowledge to fraction understanding. Developmental psychology, 59(8), 1407.
Milla, N., Humairoh, A., Sonjaya, R., Herliani, T., & Kholid, I. (2026). Tantangan Dan Strategi Kewirausahaan Mahasiswa Pada Ekonomi Berbasis Inovasi: Penelitian. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan, 4(3), 17628–17633.
Nindiasari, H., Yuhana, Y., & Mutaqin, A. (2025). SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW: ANALISIS KESALAHAN SISWA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL MATEMATIKA BERDASARKAN KRITERIA WHATSON. 2025, 10(3), 1234–1252.
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., & Brennan, S. E. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. bmj, 372. https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n71.short
Pellegrino, J. W., & Quellmalz, E. S. (2010). Perspectives on the Integration of Technology and Assessment. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(2), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782565
Poehner, M. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (2005). Dynamic assessment in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 9(3), 233–265. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168805lr166oa
Pramasdyahsari, A. S., Setyawati, R. D., Salmah, U., Zuliah, N., Arum, J. P., Astutik, I. D., Aini, S. N., Nusuki, U., Widodo, W., & Amin, R. (2022). Developing a test of mathematical literacy based on STEM-PjBL using ADDIE model. KnE Social Sciences, 382–391.
Radatz, H. (1979). Error analysis in mathematics education. Journal for Research in mathematics Education, 10(3), 163–172.
Rusiadi, R., & Mata, R. (2025). PENDIDIKAN ANTI-BULLYING SEBAGAI UPAYA MENCIPTAKAN LINGKUNGAN BELAJAR YANG AMAN DAN INKLUSIF: KAJIAN PUSTAKA TEORITIS DAN PRAKTIS. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Indonesia, 3(1), 95–107. http://sociohum.net/index.php/PROSIDINGNASIOANAL/article/view/300
Sarama, J., & Clements, D. H. (2009). Early childhood mathematics education research: Learning trajectories for young children. Routledge. https://api.taylorfrancis.com/content/books/mono/download?identifierName=doi&identifierValue=10.4324/9780203883785&type=googlepdf
Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics teaching, 77(1), 20–26.
Sofawi, & Kholid, Idham. (2023). PENERAPAN METODE UMMI DALAM PEMBELAJARAN TAHSIN TAHFIDZ AL-QUR`AN (TTQ) JUZ 30 DI SD IT AN-NABA DESA CIASEM GIRANG KECAMATAN CIASEM KABUPATEN SUBANG. 10–19.
Sugiri, W. A., & Priatmoko, S. (2020). Perspektif asesmen autentik sebagai alat evaluasi dalam merdeka belajar. At-Thullab: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 4(1), 53–61.
Sukardi, M. C., Kamila, I. N., Khoirotunnisa, N., Mudrika, N., & Kholid, I. (2025). PERAN MADRASAH IBTIDAIYAH DALAM MENUMBUHKAN JIWA WIRAUSAHA ANAK DI ERA DIGITAL. Didaktik: Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang, 12(01), 110–121.
Suurtamm, C., Thompson, D. R., Kim, R. Y., Moreno, L. D., Sayac, N., Schukajlow, S., Silver, E., Ufer, S., & Vos, P. (2016). Assessment in Mathematics Education. Dalam C. Suurtamm, D. R. Thompson, R. Y. Kim, L. D. Moreno, N. Sayac, S. Schukajlow, E. Silver, S. Ufer, & P. Vos, Assessment in Mathematics Education (hlm. 1–38). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32394-7_1
Van de Walle, J., Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2014). Elementary and middle school mathematics. Pearson. https://www.pearsonhighered.com/assets/samplechapter/0/2/0/5/020538689X.pdf
Verschaffel, L., Depaepe, F., & Van Dooren, W. (2020). Word Problems in Mathematics Education. Dalam S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (hlm. 908–911). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_163
Wiliam, D. (2017). Embedded formative assessment:(Strategies for classroom assessment that drives student engagement and learning). Solution tree press.
Wolf, M. K., Yoo, H., Guzman-Orth, D., & Abedi, J. (2022). Investigating the Effects of Test Accommodations with Process Data for English Learners in a Mathematics Assessment. Educational Assessment, 27(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2021.1982693
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456x17723971
Yeh, C. (2016). Mathematics, language, and learning: A longitudinal study of elementary teachers and their mathematics teaching practices. University of California, Irvine. https://search.proquest.com/openview/55078a1be8ff5ee8e626ecbb8248fa84/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750
Zebua, E. N. K., & Zebua, N. (2024). Analisis prinsip dan peran asesmen autentik pada proses dan hasil belajar peserta didik. Edukasi Elita: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan, 1(2), 128–136.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
