PENGARUH STRATEGI KEMANDIRIAN TERHADAP MINAT BELAJAR ANAK TUNA DAKSA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i01.41716Keywords:
Independence Strategies, Learning Interest, Children with Physical Disabilities, Inclusive Education, Elementary School.Abstract
Children with physical disabilities often face mobility challenges and self-confidence issues that negatively impact their learning interest. This study aims to analyze the effect of implementing independence strategies on enhancing the learning interest of children with physical disabilities. The study employed a quantitative approach with a one-group pretest–posttest pre-experimental design. The participants consisted of 15 elementary school students in an inclusive education setting. Data were collected through questionnaires and observations, then analyzed using a paired sample t-test. The results showed a significant increase in students' learning interest following the intervention. These findings indicate that independence strategies have a positive influence on students' motivation, self-confidence, and engagement in learning. Therefore, independence strategies are recommended as an effective approach to support inclusive education practices for students with physical disabilities.
Downloads
References
A. L. Dent and A. C. Koenka, “The relation between self-regulated learning and academic achievement across childhood and adolescence: A meta-analysis,” Educ. Psychol. Rev., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 425–474, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s10648-015-9320-8.
A. M. Alnahdi, “The effectiveness of self-regulated learning strategies on students with disabilities,” Int. J. Spec. Educ., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 89–102, 2015.
Bandura, Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall, 1986.
D. Friend and W. Bursuck, Including Students with Special Needs: A Practical Guide for Classroom Teachers, 7th ed. Boston, MA, USA: Pearson, 2012.
E. H. Mahvelati, “Learners’ perceptions and performance under peer versus teacher corrective feedback,” Stud. Educ. Eval., vol. 70, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.100995.
F. Baier et al., “What makes a good teacher? The relative importance of teachers’ cognitive ability, beliefs, and motivation,” Br. J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 89, no. 4, pp. 767–786, 2019, doi: 10.1111/bjep.12256.
F. M. van der Kleij, “Comparison of teacher and student perceptions of formative assessment feedback practices,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 85, pp. 175–189, 2019.
F. Reichert, D. Lange, and L. Chow, “Educational beliefs matter for classroom instruction,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 98, pp. 1–13, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2020.103248.
G. Ocak and A. Yamaç, “Examination of the relationships between fifth graders’ self-regulated learning strategies, motivational beliefs, attitudes, and achievement,” Educ. Sci. Theory Pract., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 380–387, 2013.
J. Cleary and A. Kitsantas, “Motivation and self-regulated learning influences on middle school mathematics achievement,” School Psych. Rev., vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 88–107, 2017.
J. Roick and T. Ringeisen, “Students’ math performance in higher education: Examining the role of self-regulated learning and self-efficacy,” Learn. Individ. Differ., vol. 65, pp. 148–158, 2018.
J. W. Creswell, Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research, 4th ed. Boston, MA, USA: Pearson, 2012.
J. R. Fraenkel, N. E. Wallen, and H. H. Hyun, How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education, 8th ed. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, 2012.
K. Ismayilova and R. M. Klassen, “Research and teaching self-efficacy of university faculty,” Int. J. Educ. Res., vol. 98, pp. 55–66, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2019.08.012.
M. Pressley and C. B. McCormick, Advanced Educational Psychology for Educators, Researchers, and Policymakers. New York, NY, USA: HarperCollins, 1995.
P. Delgado et al., “Don’t throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension,” Educ. Res. Rev., vol. 25, pp. 23–38, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.003.
R. G. Brockett and R. Hiemstra, Self-Direction in Adult Learning: Perspectives on Theory, Research, and Practice. London, UK: Routledge, 2020.
R. Hiemstra and R. G. Brockett, “Reframing the meaning of self-directed learning: An updated model,” in Adult Education Research Conference Proceedings, 2012, pp. 155–161.
R. Pintrich, “The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning,” in Handbook of Self-Regulation, M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, and M. Zeidner, Eds. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press, 2000, pp. 451–502.
S. Geng, K. M. Y. Law, and B. Niu, “Investigating self-directed learning and technology readiness in blended learning environment,” Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 16, no. 17, pp. 1–22, 2019, doi: 10.1186/s41239-019-0147-0.
S. Hallahan, J. Kauffman, and P. Pullen, Exceptional Learners: An Introduction to Special Education, 13th ed. Boston, MA, USA: Pearson, 2015.
S. Li and J. Zheng, “The relationship between self-efficacy and self-regulated learning in one-to-one computing environment: The mediated role of task values,” Asia-Pacific Educ. Res., vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 455–463, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s40299-018-0405-2.
UNESCO, Guidelines for Inclusion: Ensuring Access to Education for All. Paris, France: UNESCO,
Zimmerman, “Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview,” Educ. Psychol., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 3–17, 1990, doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep2501_2.
Zimmerman and A. R. Moylan, “Self-regulation: Where metacognition and motivation intersect,” in Handbook of Metacognition in Education, D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, and A. C. Graesser, Eds. New York, NY, USA: Routledge, 2009, pp. 299–315.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
