UTILIZING GRAMMARLY TO IDENTIFY THE ERRORS OF STUDENTS’ RECOUNT TEXT: A CASE STUDY IN MTS CENRANA

Authors

  • Radiah Kabirah Muhammadiyah University of Bone

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i01.41187

Keywords:

writing errors, learning motivation, Grammarly, recount text, MTs students.

Abstract

This study discussed the writing skills of MTs (Madrasah Tsanawiyah) students in recount texts with the assistance of the Grammarly application. Writing was a complex skill, and students often encountered difficulties in grammar, vocabulary, and idea organization. Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) technology such as Grammarly could provide quick and accurate feedback, thus potentially aiding the learning process. However, most previous studies had only focused on university or vocational school contexts, while the use of Grammarly for junior high school/MTs students in writing recount texts remained understudied. Therefore, this research aimed to fill that gap.

The objectives of this study were to identify the types of errors in recount texts written by ninth-grade students at MTs Cenrana and to understand Grammarly's role in enhancing students' motivation in English writing. This research employed a qualitative descriptive method with a case study approach, involving 20 students as subjects for text error analysis, with 10 of them receiving Grammarly treatment and a motivation questionnaire.

The findings of the study demonstrated the effectiveness of Grammarly in improving students' recount text writing skills, evidenced by a significant increase in the average score from 41.5 to 80.0 (p=0.004) and a dominant reduction in word errors (40%), sentence structure errors (35%), and spelling and punctuation errors (25%), while student motivation also greatly improved 80% were in the high category due to instant feedback that boosted interest, confidence, independent revision, and tense consistency. This led to the conclusion that Grammarly was effective as both a correction tool and a motivational trigger, with recommendations for its integration into learning and further research to examine long-term impacts and premium features of Grammarly. 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Books:

Hayes, J. R. (2004). A cognitive process theory of writing. In Literacy major themes in education (Vol. 3, pp. 40–63).

Hiver, P., Al-Hoorie, A. H., & Mercer, S. (2018). Teacher psychology in language teaching: Contributions from applied linguistics. Language Teaching, 51(1), 99–115.

Hyland, K. (2016). Teaching and researching writing (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Journal Articles:

Alharbi, A. (2021). The impact of Grammarly on academic writing: Benefits and limitations. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 12(3), 456–465.

Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learners' errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 5(1-4), 161–170.

Dulay, H., Burt, M., & Krashen, S. (1982). Language two. Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R. (1997). Second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.

Karatay, Y. (2024). The role of automated writing evaluation in EFL writing instruction: A meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(2), 145–167.

Kurniawan, D., Setyaningsih, E., & Putra, A. (2024). Enhancing student autonomy and motivation in writing through AI feedback tools. International Journal of Educational Technology, 11(1), 88–102.

Prasetya, R. E., & Raharjo, A. (2023). Error analysis of simple past tense in Indonesian EFL students’ recount texts. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(3), 455–467.

Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158.

Suwarni, A., & Nurhani. (2017). The use of REAP technique to improve students' reading comprehension at the eleventh grade of SMK Negeri 2 Watampone. The 1st International Conference on Language, Literature and Teaching, 146–164.

Yao, C., Li, X., & Wang, Q. (2021). Automated writing evaluation in the classroom: A review of effectiveness and pedagogical implications. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(5), 987–1010.

Yulianti, E., & Reni. (2017). The effectiveness of Grammarly in teaching writing recount text using a genre-based approach. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 5(3), 10–18.

Theses / Dissertations:

Damayanti, D. (2024). The effect of using Grammarly on students' writing skill of recount text at SMKS YPSEI Palangka Raya [Undergraduate thesis]. Universitas Palangka Raya.

Reports / Official Documents:

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2021). Dokumen Kurikulum Merdeka. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report 2020: Inclusion and education - All means all. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-24