PENGARUH INTENSITAS PENGGUNAAN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KOMPUTASIONAL DAN LITERASI DIGITAL MAHASISWA PENDIDIKAN GURU MADRASAH IBTIDAIYAH (PGMI)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i01.40416Keywords:
artificial intelligence, computational thinking, digital literacy, PGMI studentAbstract
The rapid development of technology in the Society 5.0 era has increased the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in higher education, raising concerns about its impact on students’ computational thinking skills and digital literacy. This study aims to examine the influence and relationship between the intensity of AI usage and computational thinking as well as digital literacy among students of Islamic Elementary Teacher Education (PGMI) at Institut Attanwir Bojonegoro. A quantitative correlational design was employed involving 114 undergraduate PGMI students from various semesters. Data were collected through validated and reliable questionnaires measuring AI usage intensity, computational thinking skills, and digital literacy. Data analysis was conducted using Spearman’s rank correlation and simple linear regression. The results indicate that AI usage intensity has a positive and significant relationship with computational thinking skills, although the correlation is weak (r = 0.220) with a contribution of 3.6%. Conversely, AI usage intensity does not show a significant relationship or effect on students’ digital literacy. These findings suggest that while AI can support the development of computational thinking when used appropriately, it does not automatically enhance digital literacy. Therefore, pedagogical integration, critical engagement, and ethical guidance are essential to optimize the role of AI in developing students’ 21st-century competencies.
Downloads
References
Abou Hashish, E. A., & Alnajjar, H. (2024). Digital proficiency: assessing knowledge, attitudes, and skills in digital transformation, health literacy, and artificial intelligence among university nursing students. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 508. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05482-3
Agaoglu, F. O., Bas, M., Tarsuslu, S., Ekinci, L. O., & Agaoglu, N. B. (2025). The mediating digital literacy and the moderating role of academic support in the relationship between artificial intelligence usage and creative thinking in nursing students. BMC Nursing, 24(1), 484. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03128-3
Angraini, L. M., & Kania, N. (2023). Pelatihan Soal-Soal Berpikir Komputasi Pada Mahasiswa Baru Pendidikan Matematika. INCOME: Indonesian Journal of Community Service and Engagement, 2(3), 232–236. https://doi.org/10.56855/income.v2i3.716
Farwati, M., Salsabila, I. T., Navira, K. R., & Sutabri, T. (2023). Analisa Pengaruh Teknologi Artificial Intelligence (AI) dalam Kehidupan Sehari-hari. JURSIMA: Jurnal Sistem Informasi Dan Manajemen, 11(01), 39–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47024/js.v11i1.563
Fauji, T., Sampoerno, P. D., & Hakim, L. El. (2023). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Komputasional Berdasarkan Mathematics Self-Concept (MSC) dengan Mengontrol Kemampuan Awal Matematis (KAM). EQUALS: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.46918/equals.v6i2.1885
Gunawan, I. (2015). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif: Teori dan Praktik. Universitas Negeri Malang Press.
Gunawan, M. A. (2015). Statistik Penelitian Bidang Pendidikan, Psikologi dan Sosial. Parama Publishing.
Ifelebuegu, A. O., Kulume, P., & Cherukut, P. (2023). Chatbots and AI in Education (AIEd) tools: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(2), 332–345. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.2.29
Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan T. (2024). Panduan Penggunaan Generative Artificial Intelligence ( GenAI ). Direktorat Pembelajaran dan Kemahasiswaan dan Direktorat Jendral Pendidikan Tinggi, Riset, dan Teknologi.
Li, X., Han, G., Fang, B., & He, J. (2025). Advancing the In-Class Dialogic Quality: Developing an Artificial Intelligence-Supported Framework for Classroom Dialogue Analysis. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 34(1), 495–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-024-00872-z
Liu, J., Zhang, Y., Li, W., Wang, Q., Niu, P., & Zhang, X. (2025). Adaptive vs. planned metacognitive scaffolding for computational thinking: Evidence from generative AI-supported programming in elementary education. Computers & Education, 241, 105473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105473
N. Christi, S. R., & Rajiman, W. (2023). Pentingnya Berpikir Komputasional dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Journal on Education, 5(4), 12590–12598. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v5i4.2246
Pakpahan, R. (2021). Analisa Pengaruh Implementasi Artificial Intelligence dalam Kehidupan Manusa. Journal of Information System, Informatics and Computing, 5(2), 506–513. https://doi.org/10.52362/jisicom.v5i2.616
Ririen, D., & Daryanes, F. (2022). Analisis Literasi Digital Mahasiswa. Research and Development Journal of Education, 8(1), 210. https://doi.org/10.30998/rdje.v8i1.11738
Rodrigues, R. N., Costa, C., Brito-Costa, S., Abbasi, M., & Martins, F. (2025). Impact of a Training Program on Developing Computational Thinking in Pre-Service Primary School Teachers: From Theory to Practice. Educational Process International Journal, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.14.37
Roshanaei, M., Olivares, H., & Lopez, R. R. (2023). Harnessing AI to Foster Equity in Education: Opportunities, Challenges, and Emerging Strategies. Journal of Intelligent Learning Systems and Applications, 15(04), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.4236/jilsa.2023.154009
Sari, S. P., Siregar, E. F. S., & Lubis, B. S. (2021). Pengembangan Pembelajaran Blended Learning Berbasis Model Flipped Learning untuk Meningkatkan 6C For HOTS Mahasiswa PGSD UMSU. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(5), 3460–3471. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i5.1334
Sonni, A. F., Mau, M., Akbar, M., & Putri, V. C. C. (2025). AI and Digital Literacy: Impact on Information Resilience in Indonesian Society. Journalism and Media, 6(3), 100. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6030100
Subandowo, M. (2022). Teknologi Pendidikan di Era Society 5.0. Jurnal Sagacious, 9(1), 24–35. https://rumahjurnal.net/sagacious/article/view/1139
Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif (Cetakan ke). Alfabeta.
Sujana, A., & Rachmatin, D. (2019). Literasi Digital Abad 21 Bagi Mahasiswa PGSD: Apa, Mengapa, dan Bagaimana. Conference Series Journal, 1(1), 1–7. https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/crecs/article/view/14284
Weng, X., Ye, H., Dai, Y., & Ng, O. (2024). Integrating Artificial Intelligence and Computational Thinking in Educational Contexts: A Systematic Review of Instructional Design and Student Learning Outcomes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 62(6), 1420–1450. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331241248686
Yanti, N., Mulyati, Y., Sunendar, D., & Damaianti, V. (2021). Tingkat Literasi Digital Mahasiswa Indonesia. Diksa : Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 7(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.33369/diksa.v7i1.22391
Yu, H. M., Kim, S. H., & Lee, H. (2025). AI-Assisted Integration of Computational Thinking: Pre-service Teachers’ Experiences in Early Childhood Mathematics Education. International Journal of Early Childhood, 57(3), 987–1015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-025-00434-4
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
