DIMENSI FILOSOFIS TATA KELOLA PEMERINTAHAN: Rekonstruksi Ontologi, Epistemologi, dan Aksiologi Administrasi Publik untuk Reformasi Birokrasi Berkelanjutan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i03.40388Keywords:
falsafah administrasi publik; reformasi birokrasi; good governanceAbstract
Krisis etika birokrasi yang ditandai dengan praktik korupsi, kolusi, dan nepotisme (KKN) mengindikasikan adanya kegagalan filosofis dalam penyelenggaraan administrasi publik di Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis urgensi falsafah administrasi publik dalam bernegara melalui dimensi ontologi, epistemologi, dan aksiologi serta implikasinya terhadap reformasi birokrasi berkelanjutan. Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif-deskriptif dengan studi pustaka (library research) dan analisis isi (content analysis). Sumber data meliputi literatur filsafat ilmu, teori administrasi publik klasik dan kontemporer, dokumen kebijakan nasional, serta jurnal ilmiah relevan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dimensi ontologis menegaskan hakikat administrasi publik sebagai manifestasi kedaulatan rakyat dan pelayan kepentingan umum. Dimensi epistemologis memberikan landasan rasional-kritis untuk validasi kebenaran administratif dan perumusan paradigma baru. Dimensi aksiologis berfungsi sebagai kontrol moral yang menjamin keadilan sosial dan mencegah substitusi nilai publik dengan nilai pribadi. Penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa reformasi birokrasi berkelanjutan memerlukan transformasi filosofis yang mengintegrasikan ketiga dimensi tersebut, khususnya melalui penerapan paradigma New Public Service (NPS) dan penguatan infrastruktur etis aparatur sipil negara.
Downloads
References
Aliyu, A. O., Singaravelloo, K., & Mansor, N. (2021). A review of administrative reforms in developing countries: Why the limited success? Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 11(2), 178-190. https://doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v11i2.18571
Ansell, C., & Torfing, J. (2021). Public governance as co-creation: A strategy for revitalizing the public sector and rejuvenating democracy. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108765381
Bauer, M. W., Peters, B. G., Pierre, J., Yesilkagit, K., & Becker, S. (Eds.). (2021). Democratic backsliding and public administration: How populists in government transform state bureaucracies. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009023504
Bozeman, B., Nelson, J. P., Bretschneider, S., & Lindsay, S. (2024). The deformation of democracy in the United States: When does bureaucratic 'neutral competence' rise to complicity? Public Administration Review, 84(5), 796-816. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13855
Cataldi, L. (2024). New public governance as a hybrid: A critical interpretation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009418904
Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2024). NPM reconsidered: Towards the study of enduring forms of NPM. Public Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2024.2375561
Christensen, T., Lægreid, P., & Røvik, K. A. (2020). Organization theory and the public sector: Instrument, culture and myth (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367855772
Demir, T., Reddick, C. G., & Perlman, B. J. (2023). Ethical performance in local governments: An empirical study of organizational leadership and ethics culture. The American Review of Public Administration, 53(3-4), 123-139. https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740231175653
Elias, N. M., & Olejarski, A. M. (Eds.). (2020). Ethics for contemporary bureaucrats: Navigating constitutional crossroads. Routledge.
Fuertes, V. (2021). The rationale for embedding ethics and public value in public administration programmes. Teaching Public Administration, 39(3), 287-304. https://doi.org/10.1177/01447394211028275
Haque, M. S. (2020). Entrepreneurship-driven public management reforms in Southeast Asia: Critical implications for public accountability. Public Administration and Development, 40(4), 220-231. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1889
Huijbregts, R., George, B., & Bekkers, V. (2022). Public values assessment as a practice: Integration of evidence and research agenda. Public Management Review, 24(6), 840-859. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1867227
Kimura, E., & Anugrah, I. (2024). Indonesia in 2023: Between democracy and dynasty. Asian Survey, 64(2), 267-277. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2024.64.2.267
Knox, C., & Sharipova, D. (2023). Public sector reforms in developing countries: A preliminary review. Public Administration and Development, 43(5), 368-380. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.2030
Koliba, C. (2025). Liberal democratic accountability standards and public administration. Public Administration Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13831
Mugellini, G., Della Bella, S., Colagrossi, M., Isenring, G. L., & Killias, M. (2021). Public sector reforms and their impact on the level of corruption: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 17(2), e1173. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1173
Nugroho, A. A., Haryono, B. S., Putera, F., & Noor, I. (2024). A systematic literature review: Challenges and strategy of bureaucratic reform in developing countries. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 12(2), e3186.
Ongaro, E. (2020). Philosophy and public administration: An introduction (2nd ed.). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839100345
Ongaro, E. (2021). Non-Western philosophies and public administration. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 43(1), 11-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2020.1859707
Overman, S., & Schillemans, T. (2022). Toward a public administration theory of felt accountability. Public Administration Review, 82(1), 12-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13417
Overman, S., Schillemans, T., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2021). A validated measurement for felt relational accountability in the public sector: Gauging the account holder's legitimacy and expertise. Public Management Review, 23(12), 1748-1767. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1751254
Plant, J. F. (2021). Responsibility in public administration ethics. In H. G. Frederickson & R. K. Ghere (Eds.), Ethics in public management (3rd ed., pp. 89-116). Routledge.
Qin, Z., Liu, B., Cao, Y., Xu, C., & Zhang, J. (2025). Citizens' expectations about public services: A systematic literature review. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, 1123. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05357-y
Turner, M., Prasojo, E., & Sumarwono, R. (2022). The challenge of reforming big bureaucracy in Indonesia. Policy Studies, 43(2), 333-351. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2019.1708301
Weißmüller, K. S. (2023). Understanding the micro-foundations of administrative corruption in the public sector: Findings from a systematic literature review. Public Administration Review, 83(6), 1474-1499. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13699
Zarychta, A., Grillos, T., & Andersson, K. P. (2020). Public sector governance reform and the motivation of street-level bureaucrats in developing countries. Public Administration Review, 80(1), 75-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13132
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
