EVALUASI KONDISI LINGKUNGAN SEKOLAH BERBASIS MODEL DISCREPANCY DALAM MENDUKUNG PEMBELAJARAN DI SMA NEGERI 1 PADAIDO
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i01.39649Keywords:
Discrepancy Evaluation Model, Learning QualityAbstract
This research aims to evaluate school environment conditions at SMA Negeri 1 Padaido using the Discrepancy Evaluation Model to identify gaps between ideal standards and actual conditions. In-depth interviews with twenty informants, 40 hours of participatory observation, and documentation study were employed using a qualitative approach with data collection through in-depth interviews with 29 informants, 40 hours of participatory observation, and documentation study. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis with MAXQDA 2022 software and validated through method triangulation and member checking. Results revealed significant discrepancies across five evaluation stages: design (22%), installation (34%), process (28%), product (31%), and cost-benefit (19%). The highest gaps were identified in sanitation facilities, with structural damage, and digital learning resource access, where only 28% of students have regular internet access. Based on Priority Index analysis, four priority intervention dimensions are sanitation-health facilities (PI=0.56), learning infrastructure (PI=0.41), social-emotional climate (PI=0.30), and digital access (PI=0.27). This research recommends developing medium-term development roadmaps, establishing a Quality Assurance Team, implementing participatory planning, and strengthening data-based advocacy to obtain adequate resource allocation for creating quality learning environments.
Downloads
References
Aldridge, J. M., Blackstock, M. J., & McLure, F. I. (2024). School climate: Using a person–environment fit perspective to inform school improvement. Learning Environments Research, 27(2), 411–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-023-09490-w
Ariani, A. (2021). Discrepancy Evaluation Model (DEM) Untuk Mengevaluasi Program Pendidikan Inklusif. Jurnal Pahlawan, 17(02), 22.
Bulkani, B., Setiawan, M. A., & Wahidah, W. (2022). the Discrepancy Evaluation Model in the Implementation of Online Learning (on the Basis of Parents’ Perceptions). Obrazovanie i Nauka, 24(2), 116–137. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2022-2-116-137
Chand, S. P. (2025). Methods of Data Collection in Qualitative Research: Interviews, Focus Groups, Observations, and Document Analysis. Advances in Educational Research and Evaluation, 6(1), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.25082/aere.2025.01.001
Dahal, N. (2025). Qualitative data analysis: reflections, procedures, and some points for consideration. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2025.1669578
Febriani, D. D., Mahanani, R. T., S, A. F. N., Satria, F., Shafira, M., Yapono, R., & Mahmud, E. A. (2025). Analisis Lingkungan Positif dalam Mendukung Pembelajaran Efektif dan Pengelolahan Kelas yang Harmonis. Jurnal Bima : Pusat Publikasi Ilmu Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra, 3(1), 270–279. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.61132/bima.v3i1.1568
Grazia, V., & Molinari, L. (2021). School climate multidimensionality and measurement: a systematic literature review. Research Papers in Education, 36(5), 561–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2019.1697735
Indonesia, P. M. P. N. R. (2007). Nomor 24 Tahun 2007 Tentang Standar Sarana Dan Prasarana Untuk Sekolah Dasar/Madrasah Ibtidaiyah (SD/MI), Sekolah Menengah Pertama/Madrasah Tsanawiyah (Smp/Mts), Dan Sekolah Menengah Atas/Madrasah Aliyah (SMA/MA). 3(September), 1–71.
Isik, O. (2025). Qualitative Research Approaches and Data Collection Methods: Understanding Meaning and Experience. Journal of Humanities and Education Development, 7(6), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.22161/jhed.7.6.3
Iswan, I., Nasir, M., & Bahrani, B. (2025). Evaluasi Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar dalam Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis di Sekolah Menengah Atas Negeri Samarinda ( Studi Multisitus Sekolah Menengah Atas 8 , 10 , dan 11 Samarinda ). Jurnal Ar Ro’Is Mandalika (Armada), 5(2).
Murwanto, P. (2024). Developing and Practicing Inclusive Leadership in Schools. Progres Pendidikan, 5(1), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.29303/prospek.v5i1.710
Nuha, M. S., Hidayah, N., & Hotifah, Y. (2024). Discrepancy Evaluation Model Analysis of Personal-Social Guidance Services. Jere, 13(1).
Prasetyaningsih, V. P., & Mawardi. (2025). Evaluasi Pengimplementasian Program P5 Pada Fase B Di Sd Negeri 03 Menggunakan Discrepancy Evaluation Model. Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 10(01), 58–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v10i01.22830
Putri, M. U. E., Ghani, A. R. A., & Al Jufri, H. (2025). Evaluation of the Implementation of Inclusive Education in Junior High Schools. ETDC: Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review, 4(4), 1522–1532. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v4i4.3884
Rohmaniyyah, U. A. (2025). Evaluasi Discrepancy Program Pengelolaan Sampah dan Limbah dalam Meningkatkan Kesadaran Lingkungan. DIRASAH, 8(2), 564–571.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.