THE EFFECT OF LEARNING STYLES ON THE CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS IN MATHEMATICS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i1.39543Keywords:
learning style, critical thinking skills, non-parametricAbstract
This study describes the effect of learning styles on the critical thinking skills of elementary school students in Banyumas Regency, Central Java. The type of research used is field research with an ex post facto (survey) method, taking the research setting at Sokaraja Tengah Elementary School in Banyumas. The research sample used probability sampling with cluster sampling technique focused on 123 fourth-grade students. Data collection used a learning style questionnaire and critical thinking ability test. The data analysis technique used was Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric statistics because the data was not normally distributed. The Kruskal-Wallis result using a significance level of 0.05 and an Asymp. Sig. value of 0.004 < 0.05 indicates that there is a significant difference in critical thinking skills between students with different learning styles. Thus, the null hypothesis is rejected, meaning that there is an influence of learning style on the critical thinking skills of elementary school students in mathematics in Sokaraja Tengah Village, Banyumas.
Downloads
References
Amalia, A., Puspita Rini, C., & Amaliyah, A. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas V Dalam Pembelajaran Ipa Di Sdn Karang Tengah 11 Kota Tangerang. SIBATIK JOURNAL: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan, 1(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.54443/sibatik.v1i1.4
Djara, J. I., & Sae, E. (2023). Pengaruh Gaya Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. 3(2), 226–233.
Facione, P. A., & Facione, N. C. (2013). Critical Thinking for Life. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 28(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.5840/inquiryct20132812
Firdausi, B. W., & Yermiandhoko, Y. (2021). Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Pada Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 11(2), 229–243.
Fleming, N., & Teaching, S. E. (n.d.). NEIL FLEMING’S ENGLISH TEACHING STRATEGY Juraboev Zafar Zakirjanovich Uzbekistan, Syrdarya region, Bayaut district, School No.28, teacher. 126–130.
Handayani, P. (2021). Cara Asyik Belajar Bangun Datar di SD. GUEPEDIA. https://share.google/7VGT9aIWJ3fT2KinS
Haryanto, I. A., Divaio, P. A., Indrasetianingsih, A., & Isi, S. (2024). Analisis Kruskal-Wallis untuk Mengetahui Kemampuan Literasi Siswa SMP Miftahurrohman Gresik Berdasarkan Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum. 2(1), 32–36.
Humam, M. S., Hanif, M., Jl, A., No, A. Y., Utara, K. P., Banyumas, K., & Tengah, J. (2025). Strategi Pembelajaran Aktif dalam Meningkatkan Keterampilan Kritikal Siswa di Era Modern ( Communication ), bekerja sama ( Collaboration ), berpikir kritis ( Critical Thinking ), dan. 3, 89–108.
Kemendikbud. (2023). PISA 2022 dan Pemulihan Pembelajaran di Indonesia.
Lestari, S., & Widda Djuhan, M. (1970). Analisis Gaya Belajar Visual, Audiotori dan Kinestetik dalam Pengembangan Prestasi Belajar Siswa. JIIPSI: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Indonesia, 1(2), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.21154/jiipsi.v1i2.250
Lismaya. (2019). BERPIKIR KRITIS & PBL: (Problem Based Learning). https://books.google.co.id/books?id=bvqtDwAAQBAJ&lpg=PP1&hl=id&pg=PA1#v=onepage&q&f=false
Mel Silberman. (1996). Active Learning: 101 Strategies to Tech Any Subject (Terjemahan Bahasa Indonesia). Pustaka Insan Madani.
Namira, A., Salsadila, A. A., Budiarti, A., Astiti, H. W. M., Imron, M., & Septiani, E. (2025). PENGARUH GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS MATEMATIKA SISWA KELAS X SMA KECAMATAN PASAR MINGGU. 7(2). https://doi.org/10.3483/trigonometri.v1i1.800
Novikasari, I. (n.d.). Pengembangan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa melalui Pembelajaran Matematika Open-ended di Sekolah Dasar. 14(2), 1–13.
Olenggius Jiran Dores, Dwi Cahyadi Wibowo, S. S. (n.d.). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa pada mata pelajaran matematika 1. 242–254.
Prof. Dr. Sugiyono. (2022). METODE PENELITIAN KUANTITATIF, KUALITATIF DAN R&D. Alfabeta Bandung.
Puspita, E. S., Azizah, M., Rofiatun, N., & Untari, M. F. A. (2024). Analisis Gaya Belajar Siswa Kelas V pada Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Likhitaprajna Jurnal Ilmiah Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Wisnuwardhana, 26(2), 89–95. https://doi.org/10.37303/likhitaprajna.v26i2.295
Qondias, D., & Pendidikan. (2025). KECENDERUNGAN GAYA BELAJAR VISUAL AUDITORI DAN KINESTETIK PADA PENDIDIKAN PANCASILA SISWA SEKOLAH DASAR. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, ISSN Cetak : 2477-2143 ISSN Online : 2548-6950 Volume 10 Nomor 01, Maret 2025, 10.
Rohmad, & Sarah, S. (2021). PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN ANGKET. Penerbit K-Media Yogyakarta.
Romlah, S. (2021). PENELITIAN KUALITATIF DAN KUANTITATIF ( Pendekatan Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif ). 16(1), 1–13.
Sabagh, E., Educ, I. J., High, T., & Sabagh, H. A. El. (2021). Adaptive e ‑ learning environment based on learning styles and its impact on development students ’ engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00289-4
Suparjo, Uliyanti, E., & Syamsiati. (n.d.). Peningkatan hasil belajar siswa pada pembelajaran matematika menggunakan metode diskusi kelompok di sekolah dasar.
Supit, D., Melianti, M., Lasut, E. M. M., & Tumbel, N. J. (2023). Gaya Belajar Visual, Auditori, Kinestetik terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. Journal on Education, 5(3), 6994–7003. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v5i3.1487
Syahrizal, H., & Jailani, M. S. (2023). Jenis-Jenis Penelitian Dalam Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Jurnal QOSIM Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial & Humaniora, 1(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.61104/jq.v1i1.49
Wilujeng, S., & Sudihartinih, E. (2021). Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Siswa Smp Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar Siswa. JPMI: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Indonesia, 6(2), 53–63.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
