PENGEMBANGAN TES DIAGNOSTIK THREE TIER MULTIPLE CHOICE BERBASIS GOOGLE FORMS UNTUK MENGIDENTIFIKASI MISKONSEPSI KPK FPB DI SD

Fitriana Kurnia Cahyani; Surayanah Surayanah

doi:10.23969/jp.v11i1.39535

Authors

Fitriana Kurnia Cahyani Universitas Negeri Malang
Surayanah Surayanah Universitas Negeri Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i1.39535

Keywords:

google forms, kpk & fpb, misconceptions, diagnostic tests, three tier multiple choice

Abstract

Misconceptions were found in the initial test at a rate of 38%. Misconceptions that are left unaddressed can continue to carry over and hinder students' understanding of interrelated advanced concepts. Therefore, a Three Tier Multiple Choice diagnostic test instrument based on Google Forms is needed to identify misconceptions about KPK and FPB in elementary schools more deeply.. The development model used is the Borg & Gall model with 10 stages. The developed instrument was validated by subject matter and instrument experts and tested on a small scale with 14 sixth-grade students at SDN Bungkal and on a large scale with 76 fifth- and sixth-grade students at SDN Bendogerit 1. The results showed that the instrument was highly valid, with a score of 100% from subject matter experts and 88% from instrument experts. The instrument was also considered highly practical by teachers and students. The final results of the instrument showed that 21 questions were valid with a reliability score of 0.875. It had a moderate difficulty level with a score of 0.50 in tier 1 and 0.48 in tier 2. The discriminating power was rated as good with an average of 0.45 in tier 1 and 0.43 in tier 2. The quality of distractors on the final instrument was also fully active. The Google Forms-based Three Tier Multiple Choice (TTMC) diagnostic test was declared effective in identifying misconceptions with a significance level of <0.001. Cases of misconceptions were identified four types of misconceptions that emerged, namely 100% conceptual misconceptions, 62% calculation misconceptions, 24% strategy misconceptions, and 24% systematic misconceptions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A’la, N. I., Bilqist, P. S. I., Anisa, T. N., & Aini, V. Z. (2023). Pemanfaatan Teknologi dalam Evaluasi Pembelajaran Tingkat Sekolah Dasar. Al-DYAS, 2(3), 604–611. https://doi.org/10.58578/aldyas.v2i3.1480

Aldianisa, E. T., Huda, N., & Effendi-Hsb, M. H. (2021). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Pecahan Berdasarkan Kerangka Kerja Asimilasi dan Akomodasi di MTsN 4 Kerinci. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(3), 2141–2151. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v5i3.737

Alfansuri, D. U., Hasibuan, S. W., Azizah, N., & Mustikawati, L. (2025). Ilmiah, Kemudian Menyintesiskan Teori-Teori Yang Ada Untuk. 92–101.

Arif, M. badrus S., Dewi, N. D. L., & Darmayanti, V. (2024). Analisis Miskonsepsi Cermin Cekung pada Buku BSE IPAS Kelas 5 Kurikulum Merdeka Moh. Jurnal Basicedu, 8(5), 4276–4289. https://journal.uii.ac.id/ajie/article/view/971

Asmaul, F., Dewi, M. S. A., & Dharma, I. M. A. (2024). Analisi Miskonsepsi Siswa Sekolah Dasar Dalam Materi KPK dan FPB. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Citra Bakti, 11(1), 25–35.

Awwal, M., Zakki Mubarak, A., Adawiyyah, R., Qoriyanti, L., & Fika Mufasiroh, H. (2024). Implementasi Tes Diagnostik Pada Mata Pelajaran Pai. PANDU : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Dan Pendidikan Umum, 2(1), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.59966/pandu.v2i1.1002

Damayanti, N. E., Zawawi, I., Khikmiyah, F., Matematika, P., Gresik, U. M., Sumatera, J., & Gkb, N. (2021). Pengembangan Alat Evaluasi Berbasis Three Tier Multiple Choice Menggunakan Wondershare Quiz Creator untuk Mengidentifikasi. Miskonsepsi Postulat : Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1).

Desstya, A., Prasetyo, Z. K., Suyanta, Susila, I., & Irwanto. (2019). Developing an instrument to detect science misconception of an elementary school teacher. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12313a

Elvia, R., Rohiat, S., & Ginting, S. M. (2020). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa Pada Pembelajaran Daring Matematika Kimia Melalui Tes Diagnostik Three Tier Multiple Choice. Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia, 9(2), 84. https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v9i2.4422

Fridatama, T., & Wulandari, A. N. (2021). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika pada Pokok Bahasan Persamaan Garis Singgung Lingkaran di SMA Negeri 2 Karanganyar Tahun Ajaran 2019/2020. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Matematika (JPMM), 5(5), 201–210.

Ikhsanudin, Iman, A., Ridwan, I., Mahroni, M., Rumapea, R., Andhika, M. B. P., & Hermawan, R. (2023). Vocational Education National Seminar ( VENS ) Analisis Kualitatif Instrumen Tes Buatan Guru SMK Bidang Keahlian Teknik Mekanik Industri. 51–54.

Iriyadi, D., Rustam, A., & Ahmad, A. (2022). Integrasi Pembelajaran Remedial dan Tes Diagnostik. Sultra Educational Journal, 2(2), 78–86. https://doi.org/10.54297/seduj.v2i2.253

Kirbulut, Z. D., & Geban, O. (2014). Using three-tier diagnostic test to assess students’ misconceptions of states of matter. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(5), 509–521. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1128a

Mukhlisa, N. (2021). Miskonsepsi Pada Peserta Didik. SPEED Journal : Journal of Special Education, 4(2), 66–76. https://doi.org/10.31537/speed.v4i2.403

Oktavia, F., & Zulyusri. (2024). Jurnal Biology Science & Education tahun Fifi oktavia & zulyusri. Biologi Sel, 13(2), 121–128.

Owon, R. A. S., & Saputra, N. (2021). Bimbingan Teknis Penulisan Soal HOTS Bagi Pendidik di SDK 086 Nangahaledoi. Kanigara, 1(2), 70–83. https://doi.org/10.36456/kanigara.v1i2.3995

Pristiwanti, D., & Yuhana, Y. (2024). Miskonsepsi Penyelesaian Soal Cerita Matematika Pada Konsep KPK dan FPB Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Citra Bakti, 11(2), 75–86.

Putri, J. H., Diva, D. F., Dalimunthe, N. F., Prasiska, M., & Irani, A. R. (2024). Miskonsepsi dalam Pembelajaran Matematika: Sebuah Tinjauan Literatur terhadap Penelitian-Penelitian Terbaru. JagoMIPA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan IPA, 4(3), 580–589. https://doi.org/10.53299/jagomipa.v4i3.749

Rajagukguk, M. J. T., & Naibaho, D. (2023). Mampu Memilih Soal Berdasarkan Tingkat Kesukaran. Pediaqu: Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Dan Humaniora, 2(4), 12.736-12.747.

Ramadani, E. N., & Handayani, D. F. (2024). Instrumen Penilaian Hasil Pembelajaran Kognitif Pada Tes Objektif. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Sosial (Jupendis), 2(4), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.54066/jupendis.v2i4.2159

Riza, A., Hevriani, S., & Avriyanti, R. (2023). Sosialisasi Hasil Penelitian Terkait Distractor Soal. Pengabdian Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 1, 22–31.

Subhaktiyasa, P. G. (2024). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Journal of Education Research, 5(4), 5599–5609.

Sutiani, C., Herawati, L., & Hermanto, R. (2024). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Diagnostik Untuk Mengidentifikasi Miskonsepsi Pada Materi Operasi Bilangan Bulat. Jurnal Karya Pendidikan Matematika, 11(1), 70. https://doi.org/10.26714/jkpm.11.1.2024.70-80

Wulandari, F. A., & Darmawan, P. A’la, N. I., Bilqist, P. S. I., Anisa, T. N., & Aini, V. Z. (2023). Pemanfaatan Teknologi dalam Evaluasi Pembelajaran Tingkat Sekolah Dasar. Al-DYAS, 2(3), 604–611. https://doi.org/10.58578/aldyas.v2i3.1480