TANTANGAN IMPLEMENTASI PEMBELAJARAN CODING DALAM PENGUATAN KEMAMPUAN NUMERASI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v11i01.39255Keywords:
implementation, coding learning, numeracy abilityAbstract
Pursuant to Law No.59 of 2024, the government has prioritized the cultivation of superior, globally competitive human capital to navigate the complexities of Industry 4.0 and Society Era 5.0. To align with these strategic imperatives, the integration of coding and Artificial Intelligence (AI) into the educational curriculum will commence in the 2025-2026 academic year. However, the translation of this policy into practice encounters significant multifaceted obstacles. Employing a scoping review methodology, this study delineates the critical barriers to implementing coding instruction as a mechanism for strengthening numeracy in elementary schools, Identified challenges include the pedagogical preparedness of educators, systemic deficits in infrastructure and technological acces, and variance in student aptitude. It is paramount that these impediments be mitigated to ensure coding instruction effectively catalyzes the enhancement of student numeracy.
Downloads
References
Atmatzidou, S., & Demetriadis, S. (2016). Advancing students’ computational thinking skills through educational robotics: A study on age and gender relevant differences. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 75, 661–670.
Aliftika, O., Purwanto, P., & Utari, S. (2019). Profil keterampilan abad 21 siswa SMA pada Pembelajaran Project Based Learning (PjBL) materi gerak lurus. WaPFi (Wahana Pendidikan Fisika), 4(2), 141-147.
Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32.
Awaluddin, A., & Hadi, M. S. (2025). Integrasi Pembelajaran Coding Dan Kecerdasan Buatan Di Sekolah Dasar: Tantangan Dan Peluang. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 10(01), 1081-1086.
Brackmann, C. P., Román‑González, M., Robles, G., Moreno‑León, J., Casali, A., & Barone, D. (2017).Development of computational thinking skills through unplugged activities in primary school. Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on Primary and Secondary Computing Education, 65–72.
Damodaran, A., & Kanwar, S. (2025). AI in school education: Towards a preparedness framework.
Daudt, H. M. L., van Mossel, C., & Scott, S. J. (2013). Enhancing the scoping study methodology: A large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13(48), 1–9
Hidayat, R., Kurniawan, D., & Pratama, R. A. (2023). Teachers’ readiness for computational thinking integration in elementary schools. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 7(2), 234–245.https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v7i2.XXXXX
Huang, X. (2021). Aims for cultivating students’ key competencies based on artificial intelligence education in China. Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 5127-5147.
Istiqomah, N., & Novika, F. (2024). Pengenalan Coding Membuat Game pada Siswa Sekolah Dasar menggunakan Scratch. JURPIKAT (Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat), 5(3), 925-938.
Karmila, S., & Gunawan, S. (2025). Koding Dan Kecerdasan Artifisial Bagi Guru Sekolah Dasar Dan Menengah Di Kabupaten Dan Kota Sukabumi. Jurnal Abdimas Bina Bangsa, 6(2), 1113-1120.
Khalil, H., Peters, M. D. J., Tricco, A. C., et al. (2021). Guidance for scoping reviews as part of evidence synthesis. JBI Evidence Synthesis.
Lee, J., & Jeong, H. (2023). Keyword analysis of artificial intelligence education policy in South Korea. IEEE Access, 11, 102408-102417.
Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O'brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implementation science, 5(1), 69.
Lye, S. Y., & Koh, J. H. L. (2014). Review of research on computational thinking in education. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 51–61.
Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Panduan metodologis untuk scoping review. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare.
Mays, N., Roberts, E., & Popay, J. (2001). Synthesising research evidence. In N. Fulop, P. Allen, A. Clarke, & N. Black (Eds.), Studying the organisation and delivery of health services: Research methods (pp. 188–220). Routledge.
Muklason, A., Riksakomara, E., Mahananto, F., Djunaidy, A., Vinarti, R. A., Anggraeni, W., ... & Maulana, M. (2023). Coding for Kids: Pengenalan Pemrograman untuk Anak Sekolah Dasar sebagai Literasi Digital Baru di Industri 4.0. SEWAGATI, 7(3), 393-404.
Muliadi, M., Aslinda, A., Hidayat, W., & Akbal, F. (2025). Penguatan Pemahaman Koding Untuk Guru Jenjang Sekolah Dasar Kabupaten Wajo. Ininnawa: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 3(2), 201-206.
Nahavandi, S. (2019). Industry 5.0—A human‑centric solution. Sustainability, 11(16), 4371.https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164371
Peters, M. D. J., Godfrey, C., McInerney, P., Munn, Z., Tricco, A. C., & Khalil, H. (2023). JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis: Scoping Reviews Chapter. JBI.
Putro, Y. T. M., & Astuti, R. (2020). Penerapan Scratch dalam Pembelajaran Coding Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Emergent: Journal of Educational Discoveries and Lifelong Learning (EJEDL), 1(4), 21-21.
Qurin, M. T., Wijayanti, K. D., Fathori, A. R., Sukma, H. F., Setiawan, H., Pratama, K. H., ... & Khoiriyah, N. H. M. (2024). Pelatihan Coding Berbasis Project Based Learning (PjBL) Menggunakan Platform Scratch untuk Sekolah Dasar. Society: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 3(5), 283-291.
Rifa’i, A., Rahim, A., & Hamli, H. (2025). Integrasi Pembelajaran Coding di Sekolah Dasar: Analisis Literatur Terhadap Peran dan Kesiapan Guru di Era Digital. Madrasah: Jurnal Pendidikan Madrasah, 2(2).
Sari, R. P., & Setiawan, A. (2020). Digital literacy and teacher readiness in implementing innovative learning in Indonesian elementary schools. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(3), 199–210.*https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i03.11835
Suryani, I., & Herman, T. (2021). Indonesian students’ mathematical literacy based on PISA results: A systematic review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1), 012–040.
Taufik, A., Riyadi, M., & Nurhayati, N. (2023). Pengembangan Soal Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum Berbasis Literasi Numerasi. Bima Abdi: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 3(2), 115-124.
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., & Levac, D. (2022). PRISMA-ScR: Updated guidance for scoping reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.
Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321.
Wijaya, A., van den Heuvel‑Panhuizen, M., & Doorman, M. (2015). Opportunity‑to‑learn context‑based tasks provided by mathematics textbooks. Journal on Mathematics Education, 6(1), 19–29.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
